What happens when your warp drive fails? Scientists have the answer

A red and blue "warp" behind a white tubular spacecraft
An illustration shows a spacecraft using a spacetime warping warp drive. (Image credit: Robert Lea (created with Canva))

New research "boldly goes" where physicists have never gone before, suggesting what would happen to the space around a failing warp drive.

Science fiction fans are more than familiar with the concept of a "warp drive," a device that allows spacecraft to travel at velocities faster than light, aka so-called "superluminal" speeds. These instruments are typically written as being able to manipulate the very fabric of space and time, or spacetime. Yet, even hard-core sci-fi aficionados may be surprised to learn there are a few theoretical musings about warp drives in true science as well. The most famous example is Mexican physicist Miguel Alcubierre's "Alcubierre drive."

In addition, a team from the Queen Mary University of London, Cardiff University, the University of Potsdam and the Max Planck Institute (MPI) for Gravitational Physics also discovered that if spaceships out there were already using superluminal warp drives, we could detect them via tiny ripples in spacetime called "gravitational waves" created if and when these drives break down.

"Even though warp drives are purely theoretical, they have a well-defined description in Einstein's theory of general relativity, and so numerical simulations allow us to explore the impact they might have on spacetime in the form of gravitational waves," team leader Katy Clough from Queen Mary University of London said in a statement.

Related: 'Warp drives' may actually be possible someday, new study suggests

Science fiction vs. science fact

Warp drives in both science fiction and true science are usually rooted in Albert Einstein's theory of gravity, known as general relativity. Postulated in 1915, general relativity suggests that objects with mass cause the four-dimensional fabric of spacetime to be warped. The effects of gravity that we experience arise from this warping.

The more mass an object has, the more extreme the curvature of space it generates and, thus, the stronger its gravitational effect. Light and other objects with mass are forced to journey around the complex warping of space.

General relativity also suggests that when objects accelerate, they cause spacetime to "ring" with gravitational waves. However, objects on a planetary scale, like an accelerating car, have too little mass to create significant gravitational waves. However, massive objects like black holes and neutron stars that swirl around each other in binaries and eventually collide do create gravitational waves that can be detected here on Earth.

Clough and colleagues suggest that warp drives could also emit gravitational waves, especially if they fail.

An artist's illustration of two black holes spiraling together, creating gravitational waves in the process. (Image credit: NASA)

Furthermore, Einstein based general relativity on his 1905 theory of special relativity; the foundation of special relativity is that nothing with mass can move faster than the speed of light. 

That means sci-fi writers have to introduce circumstances that allow this rule to be broken, or at least slightly twisted, in order to consider faster-than-light travel. In DC Comics, for instance, there exists a ubiquitous field outside spacetime called the "speed force" that gives Wally West, the Flash, the energy needed to outrace light (and Superman, if you ask me).

In Star Trek, exotic matter with negative mass allows the USS Enterprise to travel at faster-than-light or "warp speeds" by generating a warp bubble around the ship in which spacetime is warped, compressed ahead of the ship, and stretched out behind it. That means the USS Enterprise bends and warps spacetime itself, thus not breaking Einstein's special relativity rules, unlike the Flash and his speed force. 

This team looked at what would happen if a warp bubble like the one used in Star Trek either collapsed or if the containment of this hypothetical concept failed. To do this, they started with creating numerical simulations of spacetime.

They found that such an event would generate a burst of gravitational waves that is more high frequency than the "chirp" of spacetime ripples created when binary black holes or neutron stars collide and merge. 

A diagram illustrating the gravitational wave spectrum. (Image credit: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)

Just as some light is too high frequency to be seen by our eyes, this high-frequency burst of gravitational waves would be beyond the detection capability of interferometers like the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO).

However, future gravitational wave detectors could be capable of detecting them.

"In our study, the initial shape of the spacetime is the warp bubble described by Alcubierre," team member Sebastian Khan of Cardiff University said. "While we were able to demonstrate that an observable signal could, in principle, be found by future detectors, given the speculative nature of the work, this isn't sufficient to drive future instrument development."

The team also found that a collapsing warp drive would emit alternating waves of "negative energy matter," then positive energy waves. Should these waves interact with ordinary non-exotic matter, that would give scientists another way of hunting for failed warp drives.

The team now intends to investigate how the gravitational wave signal would change when considering other models of warp drives and the consequences of a collapse occurring while traveling at superluminal speeds.

Of course, all this is speculation, albeit well-founded and mathematically robust, as there is no real evidence warp drives could exist. But that doesn't mean these findings are without applications.

"For me, the most important aspect of the study is the novelty of accurately modeling the dynamics of negative energy spacetimes and the possibility of extending the techniques to physical situations that can help us better understand the evolution and origin of our universe," team member Tim Dietrich from the Max Planck Institute (MPI) for Gravitational Physics said in the statement.

The team's research was published in the Open Journal of Astrophysics.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Robert Lea
Senior Writer

Robert Lea is a science journalist in the U.K. whose articles have been published in Physics World, New Scientist, Astronomy Magazine, All About Space, Newsweek and ZME Science. He also writes about science communication for Elsevier and the European Journal of Physics. Rob holds a bachelor of science degree in physics and astronomy from the U.K.’s Open University. Follow him on Twitter @sciencef1rst.

  • Unclear Engineer
    I wonder what would happen inside a "warp bubble" if the warp drive fails. Seems like the occupants might get severely "warped" bent out of survivable shape in the deceleration process.
    Reply
  • Delphince
    I'm flabbergasted Robert Lea decided to reference Star Trek's technology without even knowing the basics of that technology.

    "In Star Trek, exotic matter with negative mass allows the USS Enterprise to travel at faster-than-light or "warp speeds" by generating a warp bubble around the ship in which spacetime is warped, compressed ahead of the ship, and stretched out behind it."No, and no. That's the Alcubierre drive, not a ST warp drive. "Negative mass" isn't used anywhere in the system, and nowhere in canon does it say that the warp field stretches and compresses spacetime, only that it creates a distortion with a propulsive effect due its shape.
    Reply
  • ChrisA
    Delphince said:
    I'm flabbergasted Robert Lea decided to reference Star Trek's technology without even knowing the basics of that technology.

    "In Star Trek, exotic matter with negative mass allows the USS Enterprise to travel at faster-than-light or "warp speeds" by generating a warp bubble around the ship in which spacetime is warped, compressed ahead of the ship, and stretched out behind it."No, and no. That's the Alcubierre drive, not a ST warp drive. "Negative mass" isn't used anywhere in the system, and nowhere in canon does it say that the warp field stretches and compresses spacetime, only that it creates a distortion with a propulsive effect due its shape.
    You are right in that the ST canon never says anything about the shape of the wrapped space. But they do say that the shape is such that the ship is pushed in a forward direction. This implies a gradient. Even if they never speak directly about it. It is as if they said water flows down the road to the east. This implies a road that goes downhill to the east even if they never said the road was not level.

    It could also be that in their time, the word "antimatter" is expanded to include more kinds of exotic matter including "anti-gravity matter".

    In any case, all the science of Si Fi is "fictional science" they just make it up
    Reply
  • ChrisA
    Unclear Engineer said:
    I wonder what would happen inside a "warp bubble" if the warp drive fails. Seems like the occupants might get severely "warped" bent out of survivable shape in the deceleration process.
    If the warp could have its gradient reduced to zero in a VERY short amount of time. The people inside would not feel anything because they would remain in freefall. Assuming the gradient is very large compared to the ship inside the ship see no force on it.
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    What is the effect of "gravitational waves" on living tissue? The article states that they would be very high frequency gravitational waves. But, I would think they would also have extremely large amplitudes if they came from a spatial disruption that could move a space ship faster than c. So, if your head is "free falling" in the opposite direction from your "free falling" chest with sufficient amplitude to separate them by several inches, would there be any damage?

    This is just another aspect of the issues that arise from assumptions about space "inflating", with arguments about whether atoms get bigger or not, and so on for larger physical entities that are in the space that is having its size changed. "Waves" would change size in different amounts in different places at the same time.
    Reply
  • thenumbernine
    Wow, crazy, this research article completely copied my warp bubble collapse simulation videos I had posted from 8 years ago to 2 years ago. Even using v = 0.1 c. Even my video of v > c collapsing, corresponding with the paper saying "v > c is numerically unstable".
    How fitting that their title is "what nobody has seen before" when people on Youtube have been watching it for 8 years. And what's this? They didn't even find my 8 year old warp bubble simulations to cite it. Yup, my work is missing from their papers citations.
    I can't tell, they are either being inept or deceitful or both.
    Would post link to my YT for you all to verify but your spam filters won't let me so 🤷‍♂️
    Reply