I'll probably
go to see Mission to Mars soon, despite the negative
reviews I've been hearing. I just can't turn down a chance to visit
the Red Planet.
| Baseball Caps of Mars |
 |
 I've always regretted that the real Mars didn't turn out like the one in Rocketship X-M. I though it was neat that all you needed was an oxygenmask, a flight jacket and a baseball cap. |
That's how it is for me with
space movies -- they give me the chance to go, if only vicariously.
The first sci-fi film I ever
saw, Invaders from Mars, was on television one Saturday afternoon
in 1961 and it scared the daylights out of me. I watched it because I thought
it said "Adventures from Mars." What did I know? I was only five.
At that time, only a handful
of people had even been in space. NASA was eight years away from the first
moon landings. Sending people Mars was out of the question, even if we'd
wanted to.
The first modern celluloid
flight to Mars - Rocketship X-M
But Hollywood was creating
a whole different reality. As early as 1950, films like Destination
Moon were giving audiences a glimpse of the future, with a realistic
look at space travel. That was also the year that Rocketship X-M
gave us the first Mars voyage in modern cinema.
Written and directed by Kurt
Neumann, Rocketship X-M depicts a team of explorers who set out
on mankind's first journey to the moon, but because of an error in the
fuel mixture, are catapulted to Mars.
If that sounds fishy to you,
you're right; unlike Destination Moon, Rocketship X-M didn't
waste much time on scientific accuracy.
On Mars, pilot Lloyd Bridges
and his crewmates find the ruins of an ancient Martian city that is now
deserted - or so they think until stone-age brutes emerge to pelt them
with boulders.
Some of the explorers escape
to the safety of their ship and take off, only to run out of fuel before
they can make a safe landing on Earth.
For all its flaws (which
include some pretty lame dialogue), Rocketship X-M managed to present
Mars much the way astronomers
envisioned it in 1950: a desert world with meager plant life and enough
atmosphere for astronauts to need only oxygen masks for survival.
The advanced civilization
of Flight to Mars
A year later, in 1951, Flight
to Mars, directed by Leslie Salander, continued the trend with even
sloppier science and more embarrassing dialogue.
This time the astronauts
encounter more advanced Martians who live in futuristic underground cities.
The Martians offer to help the astronauts repair their spaceship, but all
is not what it seems: the aliens are secretly plotting to take over the
ship and, after building a fleet of copies, invade the Earth.
With the help of some sympathetic
Martians, the Earth visitors manage to escape. But there is no escape from
the film's dreadful portrayal of interplanetary spaceflight.
The Conquest of Space
At the same time as these
fanciful Mars missions were being committed to film, visionaries like rocket
pioneer Wernher von Braun had more realistic Mars journeys on their drawing
boards. Along with a team of space scientists and engineers, von Braun
envisioned what the first Mars voyages would be like in a series of books
and magazine articles.
One of those books, The
Conquest of Space, became the inspiration for the 1954 film of the
same name, directed by Byron Haskin and produced by George Pal, who had
made Destination Moon.
Aside from a melodramatic
subplot - the ship's commander almost kills himself and his crew because
of his own moral objections to the mission - Conquest stays mostly
faithful to the meticulously planned Mars voyages envisioned by von Braun
and company.
The design of the giant,
wheel-shaped space station, and the winged Mars ship, look much as they
did in space artist Chesley Bonesetell's classic
renderings. In one of the film's more hopeful touches, one of the astronauts
succeeds in growing a seed from an Earthly flower in the red soil of Mars.
Astroman and astrochimp:
Robinson Crusoe on Mars
A decade after Conquest
of Space, human beings had orbited the Earth, were planning trips to
the moon, and were on the verge of exploring Mars with spacecraft.
In 1964, NASA launched Mariner
4, which was to take the first closeup pictures of Mars. That same
year, George Pal and Byron Haskin made their second visit to the Red Planet
with Robinson Crusoe on Mars.
This time, Paul Mantee portrays
Christopher Draper, a lone astronaut marooned on Mars after an emergency
landing. As the months pass, millions of miles from home, Draper struggles
to stay alive - and maintain his sanity - with only his expedition's pet
howler monkey for company.
Filmed in California's Death
Valley, the Mars of Robinson Crusoe looks remarkably realistic,
thanks to the orange sky added by special-effect teams -- a prescient touch,
considering that the Viking
landers didn't reveal the rusty hue of the real planet's sky until
1976.
The lonely frontier
Haskin uses the scenery to
spectacular effect as a backdrop for Draper's ultimate isolation.
Human companionship finally
arrives in the form of an escaped alien slave, Draper nicknames him "Friday"
and teaches him to speak a few words of English. Soon the pair must flee
a series of attacks by Friday's alien masters; they trek to the north polar
ice cap, where they make contact with rescuers from Earth.
All told, Robinson Crusoe
on Mars renders a believable portrait of a martian voyage. True, Haskin
stretches the truth by making Mars more hospitable than it really is: in
the movie, Draper does not need his space suit, and he is able to replenish
his supply of breathing oxygen by heating local rocks. But even these departures,
as well as the film's other sci-fi touches, are handled deftly enough to
avoid breaking the sense of realism.
I'll never forget the Saturday
night sometime around 1967 when Robinson Crusoe on Mars was broadcast
on NBC's Saturday Night at the Movies. I was completely captivated
by the film; I remember making replicas of the alien ships with paper plates.
About 30 years later, on
the set of From the Earth to the Moon, I mentioned this to Tom Hanks,
and he lit up: He'd seen the same broadcast.
Just five years after Robinson
Crusoe on Mars, human beings first walked on the moon. NASA had hoped
to gain support for a real Mars mission, but it never came. And even as
the robotic Viking landers made their explorations of the martian surface
in 1976, Mars all but disappeared from the big screen.
Aside from Peter Hyams' 1978
suspense film Capricorn One, which depicts a faked Mars mission,
the Red Planet attracted little interest from filmmakers.
Until now. With talk of real
Mars missions in the early decades of the new century, cinematic trips
to the Red Planet have once again become fashionable.
Once again, accuracy
has taken a back seat to storytelling.
But maybe this new crop of
Mars movies will help spur audiences to demand the real thing. And then
today's 5-year-olds won't have to be satisfied with watching science fiction
voyages.
What do you think? Send your
comments to the author or editor.