'God of Destruction' asteroid Apophis will come to Earth in 2029 — and it could meet some tiny spacecraft

An illustration of Earth in space; a small-ish asteroid is toward the top right.
An illustration of the "God of Destruction" asteriod Apophis as it makes a close approach to Earth in April 2029 (Image credit: Jonathan Männel / with Eyes on the Solar System, NASA/JPL)

In just under half a decade, a 1,000-foot-wide (305-meter-wide) asteroid named after the Egyptian god of chaos and destruction, Apophis, will pass within 30,000 miles (48,300 kilometers) of Earth. Scientists don't intend to allow the rare close passage of a space rock of this size to go to waste. 

On April 13, 2029 — a Friday, no less — when Apophis, formally known as (99942) Apophis, makes its closest approach to Earth, it will become so prominent over our planet that it will visible with the unaided eye. NASA's OSIRIS-APEX spacecraft (once known as OSIRIS-REx) will be on hand to meet the near-Earth asteroid (NEA) personally. But, if things shape up, that NASA mission could be joined by a host of little satellites during its rendezvous.

Under the auspicious "NEAlight" project, a team from Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg (JMU) and led by space engineer Hakan Kayal has revealed three concepts for such spacecraft. Each of the suggested satellites will aim to exploit this asteroid passage because Earth experiences just once such event every millennium. The goal? To collect data that could help scientists better understand the solar system, and perhaps even aid in the development of defense measures against dangerous asteroids.

Related:  Asteroid Apophis will swing past Earth in 2029 — could a space rock collision make it hit us?

As to why Apophis is an apt target for a planetary defense study? Well, discovered in 2004, the asteroid quickly rose to the top of tables that measure the risk of so-called potentially hazardous asteroids (PHAs), or asteroids with widths of 460 feet (140 meters) or more that come within 20 lunar distances of Earth.

Both the size of Apophis and how close to Earth its trajectory brings it saw the asteroid remain at the top of both the European Space Agency's (ESA's) "impact risk list" of PHAs and NASA's Sentry Risk Table for 17 years. That was until a close flyby of the asteroid — a space rock that is almost as wide as the Empire State Building is tall — in March 2021 allowed NASA scientists to determine Apophis actually won't hit the Earth for at least 100 years. 

Though we now know Apophis won't collide with Earth in the next century, its scientific impact in 2029 will still be tremendous, and space agencies from countries across the globe will be closely tracking its trajectory.

Plus, as an asteroid that formed around the same time as the planets from leftover material around the infant sun, Apophis also offers researchers a unique opportunity to determine what the solar system's chemical composition was around 4.6 billion years ago

Meet the rendezvous candidates

Despite the fact that we are aware of around 1.3 million asteroids in the solar system, of which 2,500 are considered potentially hazardous (though none are expected to hit Earth for at least a century), spacecraft missions to study asteroids are relatively rare.

Thus far, only 20 missions have been deployed to study asteroids in situ, including the aforementioned OSIRIS-REx, Japan's Hayabusa1 and Hayabusa2 crafts, the ESA's Rosetta space probe, and the asteroid-hopping NASA mission Lucy, currently journeying to the Trojan asteroids that share their orbit with Jupiter.  Thus, the JMU team must carefully consider its options when considering a future asteroid-investigating spacecraft. 

An illustration of the OSIRIS-REx mission, which was renamed OSIRIS-APEX, has a date with Apophis in 2029. (Image credit: NASA)

The team's first concept is a small satellite that will join Apophis for a period of two months as it makes its close approach to Earth in April 2029. The craft will stick with the "God of Destruction" space rock for weeks after, even as it moves away. Over the course of the mission, this German national spacecraft will photograph Apophis and make measurements documenting any changes the NEA undergoes during its flyby.

This particular mission would be a challenging one because of its duration, the distance it will be required to travel, and the fact that the craft will have to function autonomously for long periods. It would also have to launch at least a year before Apophis arrives in Earth's vicinity.

The possible appearance of a small satellite sent to investigate Apophis as it visits Earth in April 2029 (Image credit: SATEX team / University of Würzburg)

The team's second concept involves integration with a larger spacecraft that's being planned by the ESA called RAMSES. This mission will be outfitted with smaller satellites, measuring equipment and telescopes. RAMSES, named after Egyptian pharaoh Ramesses the Great, would journey to Apophis and stay with the asteroid as it passes Earth.

If the second concept reaches fruition, one of the small satellites carried by RAMSES will be designed by the JMU team, with this project requiring less technical effort than the first concept while promising to reap greater scientific knowledge. 

One of the primary issues the second concept faces, however, has to do with getting REMESES off the ground — not literally, but figuratively. It's success will depend on the willingness of ESA partner countries to fund the mission. Again, a lead time of at least 365 days would be needed to ensure the success of this concept.

The third concept involves a small satellite that will only briefly fly past Apophis when the asteroid is at its absolute closest to Earth, snapping images of the asteroid in the process. This concept would require much less effort, and the craft would be relatively inexpensive.

The downside of concept 3, however, is that its observation time would be limited, which would also limit the volume of knowledge this mission would add to our understanding of asteroids.

On the plus side, the small-scale mission could launch just two days before Apophis arrives. Also, if concept 3 were to successfully observe Apophis, it would demonstrate the capability of small and inexpensive satellites in studying asteroids, perhaps leading to an increased interest for in situ asteroid-studying missions going forward.

The NEAlight project kicked off at the beginning of May 2024; between now and April 30, 2025, the JMU scientists will work out the requirements and specificities of the respective missions.

Beyond the visit of Apophis, the three concepts considered could remain options for future missions to other solar system planets, the moon — or maybe other intriguing NEAs.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Robert Lea
Senior Writer

Robert Lea is a science journalist in the U.K. whose articles have been published in Physics World, New Scientist, Astronomy Magazine, All About Space, Newsweek and ZME Science. He also writes about science communication for Elsevier and the European Journal of Physics. Rob holds a bachelor of science degree in physics and astronomy from the U.K.’s Open University. Follow him on Twitter @sciencef1rst.

  • iMaxPlanck
    Okay, so at least 100 years before we "really" have to worry about this huge beast hitting Earth, buuuuut... isn't that still a BIG problem for humanity?!

    Not that we'll be around to experience this, but what estimate of catastrophe exists for the planet and the people who will be here? 100 years isn't that far away given the seriousness of this scenario.
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    The "at least" part is what we need to work with at this point. We are working on learning how best to deflect such asteroids. We will probably learn some very useful things about Apophis when it goes by in 2029. And, it will go buy about every 17 years thereafter, giving us other opportunities to learn more and maybe do something to reduce risk of later passages. We may not even need to do something in 100 years, depending on what future observations allow us to predict.

    It is hard to realistically predict technological progress, but it is at least safe to say that we are currently rapidly increasing our space capabilities. SO, within the next 100 years, it seems likely that we will have technological infrastructure available to change Apophis' orbit in a much more reliably safe manner than anything we could attempt in 2029.

    What we probably are going to want to do is to slow its orbital speed around the Sun when it is at its closest approach to the Sun. That could get it's path completely inside Earth's orbit, so there would be no chance for a collision. But, how to do that is the question. Just hitting it with an impactor like DART would probably knock enough stuff loose that some of it could have a high probability of hitting Earth on the next pass. That is not what we want. Maybe we will want to put a solar sail on it that is angled 45 degrees from the Sun direction to bounce light towards its forward direction, very slowly reducing its orbital speed. But, to do that, we would need to deal with Apophis' rotation in some way. Or, maybe we need to capture it in what amounts to a large net, with a steerable rocket motor attached that could both stop its rotation and then slow its orbital speed. We can't do either right now, but, hopefully, we will learn how to do such things, or maybe better things, within 100 years.
    Reply
  • George²
    Unclear Engineer said:
    we are currently rapidly increasing our space capabilities.
    Don't me make laughs. We are stagnant, if not regressing.
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    George² said:
    Don't me make laughs. We are stagnant, if not regressing.
    I'll stand by my statement. I won't even bother to support it, other than to say just read the articles in Space.com, not to mention the other space news and science sites. Compare the launch frequencies, launch weights, communication capabilities, robotic mission capabilities, etc., etc.

    Try to show us where we are "regressing". And remember, don't just focus on NASA, consider the capabilities of the whole human species in space, including China, etc.
    Reply
  • George²
    Easy to prove. We have not new ISS from decades. This old ISS had to be a retired a long time ago. We have missed the original timelines for a return to the moon that were programmed in the previous US president's term and we are still delaying. Yes China made its own progress in space, but up today it has not yet pushed forward the capabilities of humanity that were achieved in the last century.
    Reply
  • Catastrophe
    In just under half a decade, a 1,000-foot-wide (305-meter-wide) asteroid named after the Egyptian god of chaos and destruction, Apophis, will pass within 30,000 miles (48,300 kilometers) of Earth.

    The impact site, known as the Chicxulub crater, is centred on the Yucatán Peninsula in Mexico. The asteroid is thought to have been between 10 and 15 kilometres wide
    Isn't "god of destruction" stretching it a little?
    Of course, speed also contributes to momentum.


    Cat :)
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    George seems to be conflating capability improvements with "achievement milestones". I stand by my statement that we are currently developing capabilities that will be useful in new endeavors in space, such as deflecting asteroids. Those capabilities will probably be robotic, rather than sending Bruce WiIlis out is a souped-up Space Shuttle. To that end, being able to design and fabricate and operate robotic infrastructure in space, plus our understanding of what asteroids are made of and how they behave under stress, will be the key ingredients for success. Technological advances such as long distance laser communications, rapid launch capabilities, heavy lift capabilities, in-orbit refueling capabilities, remote sampling and sample retrieval capabilities are all things that have been and are currently advancing. We don't have to have a colony on the Moon, or even a new LEO space station to deflect an asteroid. But, we may actually have both by the time that becomes necessary.
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    Catastrophe said:
    The impact site, known as the Chicxulub crater, is centred on the Yucatán Peninsula in Mexico. The asteroid is thought to have been between 10 and 15 kilometres wide
    Isn't "god of destruction" stretching it a little?
    Of course, speed also contributes to momentum.


    Cat :)
    Well, obviously the headline writers love the click-bait potential of a name like that.

    But, the effects of a 1000' wide asteroid striking Earth are well beyond the "shooting star" level. The Tunguska event is believed to have been caused by a meteor only about 100 to 250 feet diameter. Yet it's air blast created an 830 square mile area of downed trees. Had that happened in Paris, London, Beijing, Los Angeles, etc., the destruction would have been at atomic bomb levels.

    See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_event for a good discussion of impacts, air blasts, frequencies, etc.

    There are some geological and archeological artefacts that indicate that there have been other air blasts with heat effects sufficient to melt sand and brick. It is even postulated that some of the stories in the Bible are actually the effects of an air blast. For instance, see https://earthsky.org/human-world/bible-story-of-sodom-meteor-strike/ . So, the effects of air blasts may well have been attributed to various deities in ancient history.

    So, this time, I am going to side with the headline writers and admit that the 1000 foot wide asteroid Apophis hitting the Earth in the wrong place could create "destruction of Biblical proportions".
    Reply
  • George²
    Yes of course. We have been in the asteroid defense development stage since we first learned what an asteroid was and the real danger of one falling. So nothing new, we are still in development. That could continue forever or to the end of human civilization.
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    George, you seem to be determined to make something of this that sounds negative.

    Are you seriously suggesting that we are not likely to have developed the ability to successfully deflect an asteroid in the next 100 years?
    Reply