Black hole and neutron star mergers push the laws of physics with their odd orbits
"This is convincing proof that not all neutron star–black hole pairs share the same origin."
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Scientists have discovered that before black holes collide with neutron stars and merge, these extreme stellar remnants can swirl around each other in oval orbits rather than in circular orbits. The revelation demonstrates another way in which black holes and neutron stars push the laws of physics, and casts doubt on assumptions regarding the formation and evolution of these mixed binary systems.
A team of scientists challenged assumptions that black holes and neutron stars approach each other in circular orbits when they studied ripples in spacetime, or gravitational waves, that rang out from just such a "mixed merger." The signal from this merger, dubbed GW200105, was detected by the gravitational wave detectors Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) and Virgo. The merger occurred around 910 million light-years away, resulting in the creation of a daughter black hole with around 13 times the mass of the sun.
"This discovery gives us vital new clues about how these extreme objects come together," team member Patricia Schmidt, from the University of Birmingham in the UK, said in a statement. "It tells us that our theoretical models are incomplete and raises fresh questions about where in the universe such systems are born."
Article continues belowKey to the team's discovery was a new model of gravitational waves developed at the University of Birmingham’s Institute of Gravitational Wave Astronomy, which allowed Schmidt and colleagues to determine the orbits of the progenitor objects.
This included calculating how much the black hole and neutron star that collided to create this gravitational wave signal were wobbling, or "precessing," before their merger. The calculations revealed a lack of precession prior to the merger.
This marks the first time these characteristics have been measured for a "mixed merger" between a black hole and a neutron star, both of which are stellar remnants created when massive stars "die" and undergo gravitational collapse. The results hint at the influence of an unseen third object in this system.
"The orbit gives the game away. Its elliptical shape just before merger shows this system did not evolve quietly in isolation but was almost certainly shaped by gravitational interactions with other stars, or a third companion," Schmidt continued.
Previously, when a circular orbit had been considered for the progenitor objects beyond this merger, researchers had underestimated the mass of the black hole as being around 9 times the mass of the sun, and the neutron star having a mass of around 2 solar masses.
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
"This is convincing proof that not all neutron star–black hole pairs share the same origin," team member Gonzalo Morras, from the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain, said. "The eccentric orbit suggests a birthplace in an environment where many stars interact gravitationally."
The scientists' results indicate that there are likely multiple ways in which black hole-neutron star mergers can proceed, rather than there being one dominant formation channel.
This could help explain why astronomers are increasingly seeing diversity in merging stellar remnant binaries.The team's results were published on Wednesday (March 11) in the Astrophysical Journal Letters.

Robert Lea is a science journalist in the U.K. whose articles have been published in Physics World, New Scientist, Astronomy Magazine, All About Space, Newsweek and ZME Science. He also writes about science communication for Elsevier and the European Journal of Physics. Rob holds a bachelor of science degree in physics and astronomy from the U.K.’s Open University. Follow him on Twitter @sciencef1rst.
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.
