1st telescope removed from controversial astronomy hub on Hawaiian volcano

A mountain showing four white structures on top of it.
Some of the telescopes on Maunakea. (Image credit: Getty Images)

For the first time, a telescope on the Hawaiian volcano Maunakea has been fully decommissioned — it was dismantled, removed, and its site was restored to previous conditions. The effort comes under an agreement between the University of Hawaii and the Maunakea Stewardship and Oversight Authority, designed to smooth tensions over the construction of a new telescope on the mountain: The Thirty Meter Telescope.

Since the 1960s, 13 telescopes have been built on Maunakea, a place that's sacred to the indigenous people of the Hawaiian islands because it is where the earth meets the sky. As such, each new Maunakea observatory has been met with dismay by protestors who believe the building of new telescopes on this volcanic mountain is sacrilegious. The astronomical community, however, has struggled to find a balance between their scientific research plans and the needs of indigenous Hawaiian culture. That's because Maunakea offers uniquely pristine skywatching conditions. Things reached a head with protests against the planned Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT), which, if constructed, would be the second largest telescope in the world — and the largest on Maunakea.

Related: Why astronomers are worried about 2 major telescopes right now

However, question marks still hang over the future of the TMT. The National Science Foundation (NSF) has said it can only provide funding for one of either the TMT or the Giant Magellan Telescope, which is planned for construction in Chile. A panel was convened to determine which project the NSF should help fund. The losing observatory may still be able to go ahead should it acquire enough private funding, but the fate of the Thirty Meter Telescope on Maunakea remains far from certain. 

Still, experts are getting prepared for the event that the TMT does indeed go forward.

Until recently, the telescopes on Maunakea were managed by the University of Hawaii, but in an attempt to work more closely with indigenous Hawaiians, management of the observatories has been handed over to the newly established Maunakea Authority. The Authority contains representatives from local government, the university, as well as the observatories themselves. It is also intended to feature people with experience and understanding of Hawaiian culture in order to help guide the most appropriate use of the mountain.

As part of the handover — and as part of a deal to hopefully obtain a permit for construction of the Thirty Meter Telescope — the University of Hawaii has agreed to decommission three observatories on the mountain. Now, the first of these — the University of Hawaii Hilo's 36-inch Hōkū Keʻa Telescope, which was used for teaching — has been removed.

How the Hōkū Keʻa Telescope appeared for decommissioning (top left), the careful removal of the telescope and dome (bottom left) and the empty space left on the mountain (right)  (Image credit: UH System News)

The telescope couldn't just be messily torn down; rather, its closure had to follow a four-point "Decommissioning Plan" as part of the University of Hawaii's Maunakea Comprehensive Management Plan. The four points begin with the notification of intent to close a telescope; this is followed by performing environmental due diligence and site assessments. Next, careful deconstruction and removal of the telescope, its observatory dome, associated buildings and infrastructure can take place. Finally, the site must be restored to its original state, which also involves monitoring the area for three years to see what impact the restoration had on encouraging local wildlife.

"Maunakea warrants the highest levels of stewardship, and we remain steadfast in our collaborative efforts to honor and protect the cultural and environment significance of this āina [the Hawaiian word for 'land']," the Chancellor of the University of Hawaii Hilo, Bonnie Irwin, said in a statement. "The removal of Hōkū Keʻa reflects the university's ongoing pledge to reduce the presence of telescopes on Maunakea."

The decommissioning of Hōkū Keʻa began in April and cost $1 million. More expensive is the removal of the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory (CSO), which is much larger with a radio dish that's 10.4 meters (34 feet) in diameter. Having seen first light in 1986, the CSO actually closed in 2015 having been superseded by new instruments such as the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) in Chile.

The Caltech Submillimeter Observatory before (left) and after (right) deconstruction.  (Image credit: UH System News)

The dish belonging to this submillimeter telescope, which was named the Leighton Telescope after astronomer Robert Leighton who first proposed the CSO back in 1973, was dismantled just before Christmas 2023. Removal of the dome and the rest of the observatory’s infrastructure is already underway, to the tune of $4 million.

The third telescope to be removed will be UKIRT, the United Kingdom Infrared Telescope, a 3.8-meter (150-inch) telescope originally owned and managed by the U.K., but which, in 2014, was handed over to the University of Hawaii. Since then, it has continued operating in an automatic, unassisted mode. As per the agreement with the Maunakea Authority, two further telescopes must also be removed from the mountain by 2033 if the TMT manages to find a way to go ahead.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Keith Cooper
Contributing writer

Keith Cooper is a freelance science journalist and editor in the United Kingdom, and has a degree in physics and astrophysics from the University of Manchester. He's the author of "The Contact Paradox: Challenging Our Assumptions in the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence" (Bloomsbury Sigma, 2020) and has written articles on astronomy, space, physics and astrobiology for a multitude of magazines and websites.

  • Erny_Module
    There are actually no indigenous people on Hawaii.
    Etymology:Indigenous is derived from the Latin word indigena, meaning "sprung from the land, native".

    Hawaii was settled 800 years ago by Polynesians who sailed from the Society Islands.

    800 years - that's practically yesterday! Before that, there was no-one there (that we know about).
    Are we supposed to believe that before the Polynesians arrived, the Gods and spirits had been sitting on top of Maunakea for billions of years, waiting for someone to come and worship them? Or is it entirely more likely that this nonsense is entirely made up?
    Also, the astronomy hub on Hawaiian volcano is in no way 'controversial'. It is entirely normal and right and proper for an astronomical observatory to be on top of a mountain - it's the beliefs of the locals that are controversial, as they have no basis in fact and may be safely disregarded.
    Reply
  • FatBear
    "It is entirely normal and right and proper for an astronomical observatory to be on top of a mountain".

    That is a belief, not a fact. Just like the natives believe that it should not be.
    Reply
  • Erny_Module
    That is not a belief - it's based on physics. It's better to be above the majority of the atmosphere and also away from light pollution - read more about that here: https://telescopeguides.com/why-are-observatories-built-on-mountain-tops/No beliefs required. Also, who's to say that the imaginary Gods and spirits aren't perfectly happy with telescopes? If they were unhappy, surely they'd have the mountain erupt or destroy them? Primitive nonsense. Probably better that the astronomers go somewhere else and leave them to it. I bet if they were offered a ton of money as 'compensation' the objections would magically disappear....
    Reply
  • ridgetop111
    FatBear said:
    "It is entirely normal and right and proper for an astronomical observatory to be on top of a mountain".

    That is a belief, not a fact. Just like the natives believe that it should not be.
    The summit of Mauna Kea offers arguably, the clearest and most stable view of the cosmos since it is higher than 40% of the earth’s atmosphere - fact. The words “normal, right and proper” are ineffectual words attempting description of scientific fact. As far as the “natives” concern that Mauna Kea is sacred because it is where earth meets sky, all of earth’s surface meets the sky through its five atmospheric layers.
    Reply
  • exoHD
    Erny_Module said:
    There are actually no indigenous people on Hawaii.
    Etymology:Indigenous is derived from the Latin word indigena, meaning "sprung from the land, native".

    Hawaii was settled 800 years ago by Polynesians who sailed from the Society Islands.

    800 years - that's practically yesterday! Before that, there was no-one there (that we know about).
    Are we supposed to believe that before the Polynesians arrived, the Gods and spirits had been sitting on top of Maunakea for billions of years, waiting for someone to come and worship them? Or is it entirely more likely that this nonsense is entirely made up?
    Also, the astronomy hub on Hawaiian volcano is in no way 'controversial'. It is entirely normal and right and proper for an astronomical observatory to be on top of a mountain - it's the beliefs of the locals that are controversial, as they have no basis in fact and may be safely disregarded.

    While you are right, and to an extent, I agree, in the end it is their land.

    If you ask me, I do think observing the universe and a religion that worships sky gods should go hand-in-hand; one isn't necessarily affecting the other. However, we are not the ones in position to judge if it's controversial or not. We shouldn't err like the Americans who think they are "judge, jury, and executioners" in places that are not their own land.
    Reply
  • exoHD
    Erny_Module said:
    Also, who's to say that the imaginary Gods and spirits aren't perfectly happy with telescopes? If they were unhappy, surely they'd have the mountain erupt or destroy them? Primitive nonsense. Probably better that the astronomers go somewhere else and leave them to it. I bet if they were offered a ton of money as 'compensation' the objections would magically disappear....

    Spoken like a true imperialist with no respect towards multiculturalism. I am sure astrophysicists can live without one extra telescope in Hawaii. Improvise, adapt, overcome.

    What you should be concerned about instead is with what that buffoon billionaire is doing to our skies.
    Reply
  • exoHD
    ridgetop111 said:
    The summit of Mauna Kea offers arguably, the clearest and most stable view of the cosmos since it is higher than 40% of the earth’s atmosphere - fact. The words “normal, right and proper” are ineffectual words attempting description of scientific fact. As far as the “natives” concern that Mauna Kea is sacred because it is where earth meets sky, all of earth’s surface meets the sky through its five atmospheric layers.

    All that clearness, yet still marred by Starlink satellites...

    ridgetop111 said:
    As far as the “natives” concern that Mauna Kea is sacred because it is where earth meets sky, all of earth’s surface meets the sky through its five atmospheric layers.

    One simply does not juxtapose a literal scientific definition to explain something religious. But I am sure you are very well aware of that already.
    Reply
  • skynr13
    It's sad to see about half the people in these comments care less about the Hawaiians opinion of the telescopes on their land. We have been here in America for less than 500 years and now should we let Communism or Imperialist's just say, "hey you've only been here for 500 years, move over we want what you've got! !"
    Reply
  • exoHD
    skynr13 said:
    It's sad to see about half the people in these comments care less about the Hawaiians opinion of the telescopes on their land. We have been here in America for less than 500 years and now should we let Communism or Imperialist's just say, "hey you've only been here for 500 years, move over we want what you've got! !"

    Thank you for the counter-argument mate. I was honestly taken aback by the bigoted opinions of the initial comments here.

    While I admit I'm not the most sensitive or concerned individual when it comes to cultural appreciation, but respect is my bottom-line. Blatant disrespect for native cultures is just so incredibly uncalled for, no matter how people try to spin it (e.g. under the guise of scientific pursuit).

    Some people stoop so low it's just crazy...
    Reply
  • skynr13
    exoHD said:
    Thank you for the counter-argument mate. I was honestly taken aback by the bigoted opinions of the initial comments here.

    While I admit I'm not the most sensitive or concerned individual when it comes to cultural appreciation, but respect is my bottom-line. Blatant disrespect for native cultures is just so incredibly uncalled for, no matter how people try to spin it (e.g. under the guise of scientific pursuit).

    Some people stoop so low it's just crazy...
    Dear exoHD, Many thanks for your compliment. I do believe in what I said. Many times, I see this kind of bigotry and excessive putdown of indigenous people doing what they know is right for themselves, and then some bigoted whitey (and I'm one too, although not a bigot) just jumps the curb and demands his line of thought be better than what is right for the little guy. We have got to learn that 'all men are created equal' ! !
    Reply