Metal asteroid Psyche has a ridiculously high 'value.' But what does that even mean?

A large gray space rock with large craters on the surface and patches of brown material.
A large gray space rock with large craters on the surface and patches of brown material. (Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/ASU)

You might have heard that the asteroid 16 Psyche, the target of NASA's upcoming Psyche mission, is worth $100,000 quadrillion. But how can you really pinpoint an asteroid's monetary value?

Psyche orbits the sun in the main asteroid belt, between Mars and Jupiter. Scientists think the asteroid could be an exposed metallic core of an ancient protoplanet. If the metals on Psyche were on Earth, they would be worth more than the entire world economy, according to an estimate by the Psyche mission's lead scientist, Lindy Elkins-Tanton. 

But, of course, these metals are not on Earth — not even close. Still, the spectacularly high value does point to how exciting and impactful the Psyche mission could be — not only for planetary science but also for the budding asteroid mining industry.  

Related: Space mining startups see a rich future on asteroids and the moon

Psyche is an M-type asteroid, meaning it is metallic, though it's not entirely clear what type of metal it is made of. Spectroscopy, one of the ways scientists determine the composition of celestial objects, splits up light coming off of an object into a spectrum, giving each object a "spectral fingerprint."

"Unfortunately, metal doesn't have a unique spectral fingerprint," Vishnu Reddy, a professor at the Lunar and Planetary Laboratory at the University of Arizona who has published numerous studies on 16 Psyche, told Space.com. "You can tell that something's metallic, but you can't specifically tell which metal it is." 

Methods like radar show that Psyche's surface is highly reflective but don't reveal what the reflective material is, he said. Many scientists think Psyche's surface is made mostly of nickel and iron, since those elements tend to be common in asteroids, he added. 

Scientists can also use computer simulations, along with the giant impact craters on Psyche's surface, to determine what the asteroid might need to be made of to survive the collisions that created the craters. Wendy Caldwell, a scientist at Los Alamos National Laboratory, told Space.com that some of her most promising results, including the findings of a 2020 study, had the asteroid being made of Monel, a metal that is made mainly of nickel and copper and is thought to be representative of the composition of metallic objects in space. (These simulations also used Monel as the asteroid's impactor.)

An artist's visualization video showing the Psyche spacecraft getting closer to the asteroid. (Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/ASU)

"We can't definitely say, this is the composition," Caldwell said. But these models can help scientists identify the materials that may or may not be feasible, she added, and we'll know better once we get there. Unfortunately, it's a long wait;  the Psyche spacecraft isn't scheduled to arrive at its target until 2029. 

Regardless of what Psyche is made of, it likely contains so much metal that estimating its amount and multiplying it by the current market value yields an unbelievable number, like the $100,000 quadrillion figure, which Elkins-Tanton estimated you could get from mining iron alone.

There are no plans to mine Psyche, nor technology that would allow us to. Even if we could mine Psyche and bring the materials back to Earth, the asteroid is so far away that the cost of doing so would negate their value, Philip Metzger, a planetary physicist at the University of Central Florida, told Space.com. 

Nonetheless, some companies, such as AstroForge,  already have plans to mine asteroids, Metzger said.

"I do believe that asteroid mining will be a real thing, and it will be profitable," he said, adding that he believes it's possible for the necessary technology to be developed within decades. Smaller asteroids, including M-type asteroids, would likely be asteroid miners' first target, Metzger said .

It's not only metals such as iron that might be worth mining from asteroids, Metzger said. Asteroids composed mainly of clay contain a lot of water, which could potentially be used to make rocket fuel on off-world settlements. To become profitable, companies also might go straight to trying to mine valuable metals such as platinum.

An illustration shows the probe approaching Psyche. (Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Arizona State Univ./Space Systems Loral/Peter Rubin)

One of the biggest challenges of asteroid mining will be to find ways to give people around the world access to the resources, Metzger said. Unequal access to resources is already a substantial problem on our planet, and he hopes future industry regulations will help enable more equitable access.

In the far future, we might mine Psyche to provide resources to astronauts bound for far-flung destinations such as Mars. In the short term, however, visiting Psyche is more likely to teach us more about M-type asteroids, thereby preparing future asteroid miners for what might be waiting for them on closer targets.

"The things that we learn about M-class asteroids are going to be applied to M-class asteroids that are closer to the Earth for mining," Metzger said. 

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Rebecca Sohn
Contributing Writer

Rebecca Sohn is a freelance science writer. She writes about a variety of science, health and environmental topics, and is particularly interested in how science impacts people's lives. She has been an intern at CalMatters and STAT, as well as a science fellow at Mashable. Rebecca, a native of the Boston area, studied English literature and minored in music at Skidmore College in Upstate New York and later studied science journalism at New York University. 

  • Homer10
    There are a lot of rumors circulating that say the asteroid could be made of Gold or Platinum. It they find either, we are going to see the insanity of greed show it's ugly head.
    Reply
  • Alan Sailer
    Given that we have many samples from metallic asteroids already on earth, the compositions are very well known. Mostly nickel/iron, but there are relatively large amounts of rare metals such as gold, platinum, etc.

    Which does make these types of object theoretically valuable.

    However, as far as I have seen, nobody mentions the simple fact that gold, platinum etc are expensive only because they are rare. If you could safely get a large metallic asteroid to the earths surface, the price of all these now common metals would go through the floor. It's the simple result of supply and demand.

    It may be worth 100 gazzilion dollars in space but on earth, no way. We would only end up with solid gold toilets for sale at Walmart.
    Reply
  • Classical Motion
    Think of the emissions, pollution and waste not made with a ready made cache of metals.

    Green Metals.
    Reply
  • Alan Sailer
    Think of the hundreds (thousands?) of Falcon X launches needed to get the asteroid to the earth.
    Rocket launches are not green events. Also think of all the other toxic elements (lead, thallium, cadmium etc) that need to be dealt with. Separating the ones you want and dealing with the ones
    you don't isn't going to be a squeaky clean process.

    Landing the whole thing at once is called Chicxulub. So you also have to cut the darn thing up and send it bit by bit to enter the earths atmosphere. Ablation of the "ore" will put nice clouds of heavy metals into the atmosphere. Lead vapor anyone?

    It's not bricks of gold floating in space, it's a rock containing a nearly homogeneous mixture of every metal in the periodic table. It's got to be processed in space and on earth. I have no idea of the environmental impact compared to traditional mining. But it won't be green by any measure.

    There really is no such thing as a free lunch...
    Reply
  • Classical Motion
    It's not free. Green is the most expensive. But it's clean. No guilt.

    Chunk the metal space rock. Sling chunks into moon orbit. Wrap with heat blanket. Sling chunk into ocean. Float and retrieve chunk.

    It's a Muskian project and operation. Large scale thinking. It might start an environmental movement. And possibly a metal monopoly.
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    Many metals have value due to their suitability for various uses. Some that are rare on Earth would still be useful, even if they became commonly available. So, we need to stop thinking about getting rich and start thinking about what resources we need to develop the technologies that we want to make abundantly available on Earth. Yes, bringing tons and tons of gold to earth would make retirement accounts invested in gold lose value. But it would also make a lot of commercial products more reliable because there would be gold-plated electrical contacts where now there are brass contacts.
    Reply
  • fj.torres
    Alan Sailer said:
    Think of the hundreds (thousands?) of Falcon X launches needed to get the asteroid to the earth.
    Rocket launches are not green events. Also think of all the other toxic elements (lead, thallium, cadmium etc) that need to be dealt with. Separating the ones you want and dealing with the ones
    you don't isn't going to be a squeaky clean process.

    Landing the whole thing at once is called Chicxulub. So you also have to cut the darn thing up and send it bit by bit to enter the earths atmosphere. Ablation of the "ore" will put nice clouds of heavy metals into the atmosphere. Lead vapor anyone?

    It's not bricks of gold floating in space, it's a rock containing a nearly homogeneous mixture of every metal in the periodic table. It's got to be processed in space and on earth. I have no idea of the environmental impact compared to traditional mining. But it won't be green by any measure.

    There really is no such thing as a free lunch...
    You're not factoring in STARSHIP.
    Falcon lofts 23Tons, STARSHIP can do 150-250T. (Just how much will depend on the configuration.)

    No, there is no free lunch, but asteroid mining won't be for Earth.
    And it won't matter how "green" it might be in space.

    But it will help the mudball by providing feedstock for space manufacturing. Less launches if you ship tools to make structures instead of the big and heavy structures. We won't be spam in a can forever.

    Never mind the heavy metals,those won't be useful until we do industrial chemistry in space. Good catalysts some of them. A generation or two away.

    What will be immediately useful will be good old nickel iron that doesn't need to go up the gravity well to reach Luna or Mars. Tungsten would be good, but copper would be better. Asteroid mining will start with the basics.

    The value isn't in what might come down but in what doesn't need to go up.
    Reply
  • Ken Fabian
    "Wendy Caldwell, a scientist at Los Alamos National Laboratory, told Space.com that some of her most promising results, including the findings of a 2020 study, had the asteroid being made of Monel, a metal that is made mainly of nickel and copper and is thought to be representative of the composition of metallic objects in space."
    Yet every metallic meteorite sample ever tested appears to be nickel-iron, not nickel-copper. Is there any real reason to expect monel? Surely nickel-iron is thought to be representative of the composition of metallic objects in space.

    We don't have any samples of monel meteorites, nor any with gold or Platinum Group Metals as nuggets or seams or even as high concentration ores; they are well mixed (alloyed) within the Ni-Fe. The high value metals are at 10s of ppm (PGM's) or ppb for gold. The highest content of PGM's are found in the high nickel taenite form, up to (but rarely) around 100ppm . Which is often bands within a specimen rather than the whole specimen. The nickel content may rival the precious metals in market value and it will be worth looking for examples of high nickel content asteroid material. Which may not be Psyche. A Near Earth asteroid, that orbits near or inside Earth's orbit seems more appropriate; lots of solar power, smaller delta-v.

    How to mine any of it cost effectively is the question. Remote, robotic and automated would probably be given; nothing makes a space mission more complex and expensive and limiting than including astronauts. In-space transport that runs with minimal supply from Earth would be a given too. Solar powered electric, using water as propellant maybe?

    Carbonaceous chondrites seem more enticing to me than metallic Psyche; they can still have abundant Ni-Fe, but as grains and nodules within a soft, water rich carbonaceous material. In quantity terms mining and refining (purifying) water ice would be the biggest part of the operation.
    Reply
  • billslugg
    Nickel is at $8 a pound. Hardly worth the effort to mine it for transport to Earth. Probably best used in space.
    Reply
  • TowerTone
    " Unequal access to resources is already a substantial problem on our planet, and he hopes future industry regulations will help enable more equitable access."

    And with that attitude, the space mining industry will die before ever getting off the ground....
    Reply