newsarama.com
advertisement
EXCLUSIVE: Tito to ISS? 'In Whose Rocket?' Asks Russian Space Agency
Mir Space Station to Be Brought Down to Earth in February
Russia May Send Crew to Mir In January
Russian Space Chief: Government Must Make Sure Mir Doesn't Crash
Mir Cosmonauts Lament and Laud the Deorbiting of Station
By Yuri Karash
Moscow Contributing Correspondent
posted: 07:00 am ET
20 November 2000

mir_cosmonauts_001120

With the announcement that the Mir space station will be dumped into the Pacific Ocean in February 2001, cosmonauts who once served on the orbiting war-horse believe that while its death was inevitable, its legacy will endure.

"She was a good ship," veteran cosmonaut Vladimir Titov told SPACE.com. Titov was one of two cosmonauts who made world's first yearlong mission to the station in 1988. "I believe, Mir could fly for at least three more years. But if Russia doesn't have the money to keep both stations (Mir and the International Space Station) in orbit, it should go for the ISS."

A Mir Chronology
Heralding what would become an exciting era in space exploration, on February 20, 1986 the Soviet Union announced the launch of its new space station called Mir.

"Russian has currently no alternative to its participation in ISS program," agreed Vladimir Dezhurov, Mir's commander during its first docking with a space shuttle in June-July 1995. "I feel sad about Mir but we have to look into the future."

On Thursday, November 16 Rosaviakosmos, the Russian space agency, announced that Mir would be crashed into the Pacific Ocean on February 27 or 28.

The station will be brought out of orbit and back to Earth over the Pacific Ocean 900 to 1,250 miles (1,500 to 2,000 kilometers) from Australia, Yuri Koptev, the general director of the Russian space agency said at a news conference.

Sergei Zaletin, Mirs last commander, told SPACE.com that he felt that all the work he did during that final mission, which went April to June of this year, would be wasted.

"Sasha (Alexander Kalery, Mirs last flight engineer) and I spent a lot of time tuning the stations equipment, fixing it, looking for an air leak in one of Mirs modules and sealing it," Zaletin recalled. "I wish another crew could have make use of the results of our flight."

For Sergey Avdeev, the veteran cosmonaut who in the course of his career spent almost two years on the station, the destruction of Mir goes hand-in-hand with the Russian space industry's current dormant period.

"The decision is a reflection of the existing status quo in the Russian space industry," Avdeev told SPACE.com. "The manufacturing and designing cycle in the field of rocket space technology lasts about eight months. That means that any action in this field must be prepared at least eight months in advance. Since no Soyuz- or Progress-type spacecraft were earmarked in mid 1999 for the continuing operation of Mir beyond 2001, Russia has no choice but to deorbit Mir."

[uplink]

"I feel sorry that none of Mirs extremely valuable and unique equipment could be transferred to ISS," said Avdeev.

According to Avdeev, "it would be desirable to have two operational space stations in orbit, like the Soviet Union had for a while with both Salyut 7 and Mir."

Russia made several attempts to integrate Mir into the International Space Station (ISS) program. The first attempt took place in 1995, when Russia proposed to use the then 10-year-old outpost's core module for the ISS instead of Zvezda, a new service module. Even though Mir proved itself a robust and effective science platform, U.S. politicians made it clear that using the Mir core module instead of the Zvezda service module was not an option.

Another attempt to link the two programs was made in November 1998, shortly before the launch of the first element of the ISS, the Zarya module. Russian space officials wanted to delay its launch by 10 hours. A delay would have allowed the placement of the Zarya module in the same orbital inclination as Mir, thus facilitating the transfer of equipment and crews (in case of emergency) between the two outposts.

NASA objected to this decision. According to Lynn Cline, deputy NASA associate administrator for External Relations, NASA had no principal opposition to any Mir integration into the ISS program. NASA officials did not agree with the Russian plan because "we really did not understand this decision. It had not been thoroughly explored, and we have all already agreed on another schedule."

 

AstroView 6 EQ Reflector
$419.95
Explore More


















Site Map | News | SpaceFlight | Science | Technology | Entertainment | SpaceViews | NightSky | Ad Astra | SETI | Hot Topics
Image Galleries | Videos | Reader Favorites | Image of the Day | Amazing Images | Wallpapers | Games | Community
about us | FREE Email Newsletter | message boards | register at SPACE.com | contact us | advertise with us | terms & conditions | privacy statement
DMCA/Copyright
  What is This?