Could an 'Earth-like' planet be hiding in our solar system's outer reaches?

a red-hued planet is shaded into a crescent against a purple and black backdrop of space.
Artist's conception of the dwarf planet Sedna in the outer edges of the known solar system. (Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/R. Hurt (SSC))

Among the many mysteries that make the furthest reaches of our solar system, well, mysterious, is the exceptionally egg-shaped path of a dwarf planet called 90377 Sedna. 

Its 11,400-year orbit, one of the longest of any resident of the solar system, ushers the dwarf planet to seven billion miles (11.3 billion km) from the sun, then escorts it out of the solar system and way past the Kuiper Belt to 87 billion miles (140 billion km), and finally takes it within a loose shell of icy objects known as the Oort cloud. Since Sedna's discovery in 2003, astronomers have struggled to explain how such a world could have formed in a seemingly empty region of space, where it is too far to be influenced by giant planets of the solar system and even the Milky Way galaxy itself. 

Now, a new study suggests that a thus far undetected Earth-like planet hovering in that region could be deviating orbits of Sedna and a handful of similar trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs), which are the countless icy bodies orbiting the sun at gigantic distances. Many TNOs have oddly inclined and egg-shaped orbits, possibly due to being tugged at by a hidden planet, astronomers say.

Related: Elusive Planet Nine could be surrounded by hot moons, and that's how we'd find it

Two Japanese researchers used computer simulations to analyze the effects of such an undiscovered planet on the TNOs. Those simulations, which included evolutions of numerous real and model TNOs in the furthest reaches of an icy region, known as the Kuiper Belt, produced the extreme orbits observed for Sedna and other TNOs. 

Such a planet would be between 1.5 to three times Earth's size and would reside somewhere between 23 billion miles (37 billion km) to 46 billion miles (74 billion km) from the sun, astronomers say.

"It is plausible that a primordial planetary body could survive in the distant Kuiper Belt, as many such bodies existed in the early solar system," researchers write in the new study.

The quest to find hidden worlds

Searching for planets lurking in the frigid edges of our solar system is not a new concept. 

The so-called Planet Nine, a world 10 times more massive than Earth, is thought to be responsible for at least five strange features in the solar system including the oddly inclined orbits of a few Kuiper Belt objects. This theoretical orb has captured the attention of many, but remains undetected. But research suggests if Planet Nine exists out there, it could be residing somewhere between 37 billion miles (59 billion km) to 74 billion miles (119 billion km) from the sun.

Although the possibility of Planet Nine gained significant traction from research groups worldwide, the theory has also been controversial. Some astronomers argue that the highly eccentric orbits of TNOs, for which Planet Nine's presence was considered necessary, could occur without the hidden planet's presence. 

In 2021, an independent study in fact claimed data used by the team behind the discovery paper first theorizing Planet Nine was biased, and concluded that there's a very low chance of such a planet existing.

In comparison to Planet Nine, the newly hypothesized planet —- dubbed "Kuiper Belt Planet (KBP)" — would be much closer and more influential on the orbits of Kuiper Belt's objects, especially those beyond 4 billion miles (7 billion km), according to the new study.

It is worth reiterating that the KBP has neither been directly or indirectly spotted yet. If the KBP orbits within 34 billion miles (54 billion km), the authors say there's a 90% chance of detecting it in the sky.  

However, more information about the structure of objects in the edges of Kuiper Belt is needed to either reveal or rule out KBP's presence.

This research is described in a paper published Aug. 25 in The Astronomical Journal.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Sharmila Kuthunur
Space.com contributor

Sharmila Kuthunur is a Seattle-based science journalist covering astronomy, astrophysics and space exploration. Follow her on X @skuthunur.

  • fullerfied
    If there was a planet where this article I suggesting scientists think there might be, it would be NOTHING close to an Eath like planet. For another Earth like planet to exist in our solar system, It would have to be within the the distance of Venus to Mars , what scientists call the "Goldilocks zone" . The Author just used a clickbait headline to write another piece about planet X/ Nibiru. Nothing new. Now a theory that is interesting and would fit the click bait title is the possibility of a planet directly on the other side of the sun with the same speed as us around the sun, to were the only way we would know is getting to Venus or Mars to triangulate a view via ships Satellites or planetary stations with radar.
    Reply
  • Pogo
    I think they mean Earth-size planet.

    In 1969, the movie “Journey to the Far Side of the Sun” also known as “Doppelgänger”, was exactly about another Earth in the same orbit but opposite our Earth. The culture was an exact mirror image of us.
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    Wouldn't we by now be able to see the effects of Earth's "twin" on other planets' orbits, if it was really there? Not to mention our interplanetary satellites that would have passed it and had their trajectories "mysteriously" altered.
    Reply
  • Pogo
    Not only that, but any two planets in the same orbit opposite one another would be in one another’s L3 point, they will eventually drift away from those points and will eventually be visible. In the long term they pass one another or collide, hence the Theia theory.
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    Pogo, I'm not so sure that the L3 point would be unstable if there were 2 identical mass planets on the opposite sides of the Sun. The L3 calculation assumes a much smaller mass than the 2 bodies that define it. If the masses were the same size, their orbits would be the same radius with the same period. And, since the Sun is the dominant player in the attraction, the effects of the two planets on each other seems small, at least compared to the effects of other planets passing by both at different times. So, I do agree that the concept of another planet in an identical orbit around the Sun should get perturbed out of that position in 4.6 billion years, but mainly because the effects of the other planets would tend to have non-identical perturbations on the different planets at somewhat different times.
    Reply
  • Helio
    This report seems to do much to support Brown's original work placing Planet IX to about 600 AU based on the orbital anomalies he was able to measure. These refined measurements bring this estimate to less than 500 AU. They also estimate the mass to be less, but this is logical since their version is closer to the TNOs they've measured -- inverse sq. law.

    Although, the planet, if found, is far outside the HZ, lets not exclude entirely it could have a warm-enough moon to host liquid water. We see this for many moons in our system, due heavily to tidal stress. Water is ubiquitous, but certain conditions, of course, are needed for it to be in a long-term liquid phase. Pessimism is warranted for any life prospect out there.
    Reply
  • Helio
    Unclear Engineer said:
    Wouldn't we by now be able to see the effects of Earth's "twin" on other planets' orbits, if it was really there? Not to mention our interplanetary satellites that would have passed it and had their trajectories "mysteriously" altered.
    Well, one would think so. But, this seems to be a story we've seen before. Leverrier , a young buck at the Paris Obs., calculated where a planet must be to explain the orbital anomaly of Uranus. It's possible they didn't like his arrogance, IMO, so he finally handed to one of the few who would bother with his prediction. The German astronomer he gave it to discovered it that very night he first looked.
    But 40AU is a lot easier than 400 AU, or more.

    With the great ability of IR imaging, which reveals the most distant objects in our system much better than visual, it's been a surprise, to your point, that nothing has surfaced. Some think the background glow of the MW is inhibiting the discovery.

    A counter-model was presented shortly after Brown presented his model. I can't recall her name (Irish) , but she demonstrated that the TNO's themselves may have enough mass collectively to cause the odd orbital anomalies. I don't think this was ever debunked.
    Reply
  • Classical Motion
    Can't we put a probe in L3 and verify it exists. And if it does, then measure the character of it? Let's stick an improved webb 2 into it. We might even bow a communication link thru the corona.
    Reply
  • Classical Motion
    Or maybe a repeater in L4 or L5.
    Reply
  • Pogo
    L4 and L5 are stable especially for a larger planetary body, hence Jupiter’s Trojan family. L1, L2, and L3 are inherently unstable, see the Wikipedia article ‘Lagrange points’, especially that the Earth is pretty small and it’s orbit has a small eccentricity. If there was a body at L3, when the Earth or anti-Earth is at perapsis and the other is at apoapsis, the orbital velocities are different enough that one should appear enough ahead or behind in its orbit to be visible to the other.
    L3 might be more stable if the Earth’s orbit was circular and it was the only planet. But, since all 8 planets tug on the Sun, even to the point that occasionally the barycenter is actually outside the body of the Sun, the L3 point can’t really hold anything.
    Reply