To Researchers, Space Samples Are Well Worth The Cost of Fetching

To Researchers, Space Samples Are Well Worth The Cost of Fetching
An artist's illustration of the sample-return capsule from Japan's Hayabusa asteroid probe, which returned to Earth June 13, 2010, from a seven-year mission. (Image credit: JAXA)

Ifa Japanese space capsule that recently returned to Earth is found to have collectedparticles from a billion-year-old space rock, it will join the short history oflucrative sample-return missions. ?

Retrieving samples from space is considered more complicated, potentially more costly,and riskier than conducting remote or robotic expeditions, but successfulretrievals can confirm or disprove theories more accurately and can fuel oraccelerate decades of scientific research.

"Witha sample-return mission, you have a resource from which you can harvestinformation for generations," Michael Zolensky from NASA's Johnson SpaceCenter in Houston told Space.com."It is much easier and more efficient to perform analyses on Earth thananywhere else."

Zolensky,an associate curator for the interplanetary dust stored at Johnson Space Center,was a co-investigator for NASA's Stardust mission, the first to return samplesfrom a comet and from interstellar space. He is also a member of the sample-analysisteam for the Japanese Hayabusa mission.

The Hayabusa asteroid probe plunged through Earth's atmosphere over part of theAustralian outback June 13, returning to our planet after a seven-year journey inwhich it encountered the asteroid 25143 Itokawa.

"I'mvery optimistic, since these samples would forge the first direct link betweenmeteorites and asteroids," he said.

NASA'sGenesis mission collected particles from the solar wind, providing the spaceagency with its first extraterrestrial sample since the Apollo program, whichended in 1975.

Thegoal of Genesis, which launched in 2001 and crash-landed on Earth in 2004, wasto gather solar-wind atoms in order to analyze and measure the composition ofthe sun. Determining the sun's elemental and isotopic composition can helpastronomers better understand the chemical evolution of the solar nebula, whenthe planets in our solar system were being formed.

Samplesare cataloged and preserved by curators at the Astromaterials Acquisition andCuration Office at Johnson Space Center. The curators also manage requests forthe samples' use.

"Weget much more precise data off of returned samples," Allton toldSPACE.com. "You can have a sample and test it with differentstate-of-the-art instruments, and different teams can confirm or dispute theresults. People have been looking at the sun with remote sensing, but they'renot anywhere near close to the accuracy and precision that you can get with areturn sample."

"Withremote analyses, you only have one chance to get it right," he said."With analyses in the lab, you can retry and refine analyticalprocedures."

"Thereare some things we can't do on Mars ? dating a rock is one of the criticalthings," Michael Meyer, Mars chief scientist at NASA Headquarters inWashington, D.C., told SPACE.com. "We know that water was a critical partof the planet's history, but we won't know for how long until we can date someof the rocks."

"We'vebeen working hard over the last year and a half to develop a joint Mars programwith the European Space Agency," Meyer said. "We've been wanting todo a sample-return mission for quite some time, and one of the things we'vedone through the years is gone through a learning process."

"It'sbig ? really big ? and everything is in one basket," Meyer said."It's very expensive in any one fiscal year, so we've split it up intothree different segments. This spreads out the risk itself and spreads out thecost. It's kind of like making a down payment."

Theproposal calls for a joint mission in 2016 to place an orbiter around Mars,followed by putting two rovers (one belonging to NASA and one belonging to ESA)on the planet's surface in 2018. The rovers will have the ability to collectand cache samples that can be sealed off in preparation for transportation backto Earth.

"Bysplitting it up like that, we spread out the risk and each element becomesmanageable," Meyer said. "There are also other advantages, because ifone part of the process breaks, we can repeat it, and whatever step the sampleis in, it can stay there until the next step is accomplished."

"It'san expensive thing to do," Meyer said. "But there are huge advantagesto sample return. You get to interrogate the sample, and when you doexperiments here on Earth, you actually pick apart a rock and look at separateminerals. You can't do that on Mars."

"Youcan revisit a sample, or a couple of years later, someone can go back andinterrogate the sample with a new approach," he said. "To be able tobring something back that has context ? it's sort of the Holy Grail. It's thegift that keeps on giving."

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Denise Chow
NBC News science writer

Denise Chow is a former Space.com staff writer who then worked as assistant managing editor at Live Science before moving to NBC News as a science reporter, where she focuses on general science and climate change. She spent two years with Space.com, writing about rocket launches and covering NASA's final three space shuttle missions, before joining the Live Science team in 2013. A Canadian transplant, Denise has a bachelor's degree from the University of Toronto, and a master's degree in journalism from New York University. At NBC News, Denise covers general science and climate change.