FAA to conduct new environmental review for SpaceX's Starship operations in Florida

a large silver rocket launches into a cloudy sky
SpaceX's Starship rocket launches on its third test flight, on March 14, 2024. (Image credit: SpaceX via X)

SpaceX will have to clear another regulatory hurdle before ramping up work with its Starship megarocket on Florida's Space Coast.

The company currently builds, tests and launches the 400-foot-tall (122 meters) Starship, which is still in development, at its Starbase site in South Texas. But SpaceX wants to add Florida to the mix as well: It aims to fly the giant vehicle from Launch Complex 39A at NASA's Kennedy Space Center (KSC), which already hosts liftoffs of SpaceX's Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy rockets.

In 2019, a NASA-led environmental assessment (EA) concluded that Starship operations at KSC wouldn't significantly affect the surrounding ecosystem. However, SpaceX's plans for the site have changed since then, and a more in-depth review — an environmental impact statement (EIS) — is therefore now in order, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announced today (May 10).

"While the 2019 EA prepared by NASA provides an analytical baseline, the environmental impacts of these proposed changes to Starship-Super Heavy LC-39A development and operations will be specifically analyzed in this EIS," FAA officials wrote in a statement today (May 10).

Related: Relive SpaceX Starship's 3rd flight test in breathtaking photos

Starship consists of two elements, both of which are designed to be fully and rapidly reusable — a giant first-stage booster called Super Heavy and a 165-foot-tall (50 m) upper stage known as Starship, or simply "Ship." SpaceX views the vehicle as potentially revolutionary, saying it could make Mars settlement and other ambitious exploration feats economically feasible.

A fully stacked Starship has launched three times to date. The first occurred in April 2023, the second in November 2023 and the third on March 14 of this year. Each of those flights lifted off from Starbase, and each of the latter two lasted longer and notched more milestones than its respective predecessor.

Proposed Starship activities at LC-39A that were examined by the 2019 EA involved infrastructure development, as well as approximately 24 launches per year, FAA officials explained. 

"SpaceX now proposes to construct additional launch infrastructure not previously contemplated in the 2019 EA; launch an advanced design of the Starship and Super Heavy vehicle; operate at a projected higher launch tempo; and land the Super Heavy booster at LC-39A in support of the reusability concept. Starship landings are no longer proposed to occur at Landing Zone 1 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station," the officials wrote in today's update. (Cape Canaveral Space Force Station is next door to KSC.)

The revised plan envisions up to 44 Starship launches from LC-39A per year, FAA officials added in an emailed statement today.

SpaceX is responsible for preparing the EIS, under the supervision of the FAA. The agency is inviting input on the matter; it will hold two in-person public meetings on the Space Coast on June 12 and a third on June 13, as well host as a virtual meeting on June 17. Public comments can also be submitted from today through June 24.

If you're interested in attending or contributing to these meetings, you can learn more here.

A positive result on the EIS would not clear SpaceX to start launching Starship from KSC, by the way; the company would still need to obtain a vehicle operator's license from the FAA.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Mike Wall
Senior Space Writer

Michael Wall is a Senior Space Writer with Space.com and joined the team in 2010. He primarily covers exoplanets, spaceflight and military space, but has been known to dabble in the space art beat. His book about the search for alien life, "Out There," was published on Nov. 13, 2018. Before becoming a science writer, Michael worked as a herpetologist and wildlife biologist. He has a Ph.D. in evolutionary biology from the University of Sydney, Australia, a bachelor's degree from the University of Arizona, and a graduate certificate in science writing from the University of California, Santa Cruz. To find out what his latest project is, you can follow Michael on Twitter.

  • George²
    The Moon jokes with americans: I still waiting for you.
    Reply
  • VladOk
    George² said:
    The Moon jokes with americans: I still waiting for you.
    who is interested in the humor of flat earthers and even on the cosmo website)
    Reply
  • VladOk
    Admin said:
    The FAA announced May 10 that it will prepare an environmental impact statement for SpaceX's planned work with Starship at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

    FAA to conduct new environmental review for SpaceX's Starship operations in Florida : Read more
    We need to check this organization to see if it works for competitors. She is engaged in sabotage and this is clear to everyone.
    Reply
  • Torbjorn Larsson
    Starship grows on you. 🙀

    VladOk said:
    We need to check this organization to see if it works for competitors. She is engaged in sabotage and this is clear to everyone.
    Which organisation? SpaceX is private and works for itself, FAA is federal and works for the state. This isn't Russia (say).
    Reply
  • VladOk
    Torbjorn Larsson said:
    Starship grows on you. 🙀


    Which organisation? SpaceX is private and works for itself, FAA is federal and works for the state. This isn't Russia (say).
    So you think that preventing Ilan Musk from testing a new rocket by delaying time in every possible way and arranging new investigations into test flights is the state’s idea?
    Reply
  • COLGeek
    Stay on topic, gents. Thank you.
    Reply
  • VladOk
    I believe (maybe I’m wrong?) that it is necessary to give the green light to Starship, making its testing the number 1 government priority in space technology, and not put a spoke in SpaceX’s wheels by coming up with new investigations and putting forward new conditions. Otherwise, analogs of Starship will start flying in Roscosmos and China, and the FAA will come up with everything to prevent SpaceX from testing a new rocket configuration :)
    Reply
  • COLGeek
    FAA compliance is not a biased process. Having worked with them for many years, regardless of how some spin things in the press, they have no political agenda at the compliance level.

    It is a standards based approach and SpaceX knows the rules and they meet them or not.
    Reply
  • Unclear Engineer
    I think the issue that could delay SpaceX in Florida would be some private entity's lawsuit that alleges that the "EPA''s" (really more SpaceX's) environmental review is "inadequate" and seeks an injunction against site preparations or launch activities or recovery activities proceeding before the issue is "settled in court". That has been a common legalistic tactic for people who want to obstruct something. But, the law does require that the study be done.
    Reply