 |
advertisement
|
 |  | Space Lifeguard: An Interview with Gene Kranz posted: 06:13 am ET 11 April 2000
|
Untitled
As Flight Director in NASA's Mission Control during the Space Age's exuberant youth, Gene Kranz was in charge when Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin took their historic first steps on the moon. In April 1970, when an explosion crippled the Apollo 13 spacecraft with three astronauts aboard, Kranz led the rescue effort. SPACE.com's Andrew Chaikin, author of the acclaimed history of the Apollo years, A Man on the Moon, spoke with Kranz about the most dramatic moments of
the flight director's NASA career for a web-based radio program. Here are
excerpts from the show's transcript:
CONTENTS:
The Cold Warrior
Managing the Risks of Spaceflight
Drama of Two Men On the Moon
Should They Stay or Should They Go?
We're Never Going to Strand a Crew In Space!
The Apollo 13 Rescue Sinks In
Apollo 13, the Movie
Time to Stop Celebrating the Past
Life After NASA
The Ghost of Past Glory: NASA Then and Now
Saving the Space Program
CHAIKIN: : My guest is Gene Kranz. During the heady years of America's race to the moon, Kranz served as flight director for some of the key space missions, including the first moon landing, Apollo 11. Kranz was in the "hot seat" in mission control when the Apollo 13 mission was aborted by an explosion 200,000 miles from home, and he helped lead the effort to get the astronauts back to Earth safely. He's just written a book about his life in the space program; it's called Failure Is Not an Option.
Gene Kranz, Welcome to SPACE.com's "Voyage."
KRANZ: Hey, Andy, it's great to be with you this morning.
THE COLD WARRIOR
CHAIKIN: : Gene, it's hard for us today to remember the mood back in
the 1960s when this country was focused on beating the Russians to the moon.
What was it like for you personally to be part of that?
KRANZ: Andy, I was a fighter pilot, and I grew up in the age of
the Cold War. I think that it was probably one of the most challenging eras in
American history. Because we were truly challenged, not only to be the leader of
the free world, but to demonstrate that leadership. And the space program gave
us that opportunity to demonstrate that we were capable of stepping up to the
responsibilities of leadership in the world.
MANAGING THE RISKS OF SPACEFLIGHT
CHAIKIN: : Now, Gene, you were in there from the very beginning, from
the early Mercury flights -- John Glenn's mission in Earth orbit. And then the
Gemini missions, which helped pave the way for Apollo. You saw some pretty
spectacular things from Mission Control, including Gemini 8's tumble in space.
Did you ever wish that you were in space yourself? Did you ever wish that you
were up there flying the mission instead of in Mission Control?
KRANZ: When I first joined in the space program, I really was
envious of the astronauts, and really admired and respected the work they were
doing, and the way they stepped up to the risk. But by the time that I'd gone
through, probably, about a half dozen of the Mercury missions, I was really
enjoying my job. And I saw that there's a new key role developing. And that role
really was working in Mission Control, and providing the management of the risks
that were associated with spaceflight.
DRAMA OF TWO MEN ON THE MOON
CHAIKIN: : Well, speaking of risks, nothing must have felt riskier or
more like you had your necks out on a limb than when Neil Armstrong and Buzz
Aldrin made that first moon landing on Apollo 11 in July of 1969. And you were
the flight director during the moon landing. Can you describe the kinds of
feelings and thoughts that went through your mind as they were landing? There
you were, running the show from Earth. But in reality, they were 240,000 miles
away.
KRANZ: Yeah. And, Andy, that's one that I could talk all day on.
I had always wanted to lead men in a great and desperate event. And I wanted the
respect and companionship of what I felt was a warrior generation. And I found
it in my young teams in Mission Control. The average age was about 26, and our
battle was really to place an American flag on the moon for John F. Kennedy, and
to a great extent, to win the initial battles of the Cold War.
The lunar landing was a second-by-second battle to overcome problems in communications, navigation, instrumentation. We had a computer that was frequently restarting. And the landing was literally in doubt until the final seconds. We were running out of fuel, and my lunar module propulsion controller was counting down the seconds of fuel remaining before a LAND/ABORT decision. When we shut those engines down we had less than 17 seconds of fuel remaining. And if you want to say this was a breathless event, I think everybody Mission Control -- [in] the words of Charlie Duke, our capcom -- we were sucking air at that time.
CHAIKIN: : That's right. He said, "You've got a bunch of guys about
to turn blue," and you were one of those guys! Do you remember how it felt when
the realization actually sank in that they were on the moon safely?
SHOULD THEY STAY OR SHOULD THEY GO?
KRANZ: Andy, this was one of the times -- It's one of the things
we never trained for. To me, at the instant of the landing, I had to get going
on a series of STAY/NO STAY decisions. We had one at two minutes, eight minutes,
and then two hours after landing. And at the instant of landing, the people in
the viewing room started applauding and stomping their feet on the floor. And it
came through into the control room in a muffled fashion. And the chill that I
felt at that instant literally made me speechless, and I had a hard time getting
going with the STAY/NO STAY decisions. Actually I pounded my arm so hard on the
console that I broke my pencil, and had a bruise on it that stayed with me for
days after. And then I finally broke through that emotional climax and got back
to work again.
CHAIKIN: : And told them they were okay to stay on the
surface.
KRANZ: That's affirmative.
CHAIKIN: : Was there ever a moment after that when you had a chance
to go outside and look at the moon and kind of let it sink in?
KRANZ: It really sunk in two hours later, when I was walking over
to the press conference with the public affairs officer. And there, for the
first time, it really sunk in, "My God, today we actually put a man on the
moon." And my team was really key to making that happen.
And later on -- We've got six kids, and I'd go to the football games in the fall. And instead of watching my cheerleader kids and football-player son out in the field, I'd just take those binoculars and stare at the moon for hour after hour.
CHAIKIN: : God, what a time that must have been. Just an amazing era.
WE'RE NEVER GOING TO STRAND A CREW IN SPACE!
Apollo of course continued. And the missions got more and more ambitious. And by the time Apollo 13 flew in April of 1970, NASA was looking ahead to really turning up the heat on lunar exploration. But of course things didn't go as planned on that flight. And in fact this is probably, I guess, what you're best known for, which is that you were the flight director when there was an explosion aboard the Apollo 13 spacecraft -- when the astronauts were 200,000 miles away from Earth. And you had to help lead the effort to get them home. I can't help but wonder what you say to yourself when something like that is happening and you have to steel yourself to handle the situation.
KRANZ: Andy, I believe that what was really key was that we had
the right -- We had arrived at the right place at the right time in the business
of spaceflight operations. The controllers had basically matured. The flight
directors -- the chemistry of the flight directors we had on that mission was
incredible. We had Glynn Lunney, who was one of the real pioneers of trajectory
operations. And when it came time to tinker with the trajectories, he was the
guy to do it. The remaining three flight directors -- myself, Milt Windler and
Gerry Griffin -- were all fighter pilots. So we grew up living with risk as part
of our business. And then when you add the training that we did in Mission
Control, the hours and hours in preparation for a mission, and then, flying all
the previous missions -- it's all summed up to the right people at the right
place at the right time, and with the right chemistry that said, "We're never
gonna leave a crew stranded in space. This bunch is coming home. And we're the
people to make it happen."
And I believe that was the kind of a background, that was the kind of a motivation -- the kind of challenge that we all saw. And these four teams in Mission Control worked together like an Olympic relay team, handing over the baton of the shift, hour after hour, day after day. We linked up with the contractors and the plants. The engineers who designed the spacecraft. It was a world-class effort.
THE APOLLO 13 RESCUE SINKS IN
CHAIKIN: : When you got the crew back, was there any kind of delayed
reaction? Sometimes when you've been in a high-pressure situation, it doesn't
hit you until later. Did you have that effect?
KRANZ: Yes, yes. In fact, in fact it lasted, I think, for
probably about three to five days. It was when we looked back that we realized
the kind of obstacles that we had to hurdle and get over. It was looking back at
these decisions we made where we didn't hardly even have time to think about it,
that turned out to be the right decisions. It was really recognizing how
desperate it was in those final hours with this crew in this "refrigerator,"
hurtling back toward Earth when we were still trying to come up with a game plan
for how we were going to do it.
CHAIKIN: : And the spacecraft was getting very cold for those
guys.
KRANZ: Yeah. Yeah.
APOLLO 13, THE MOVIE
CHAIKIN: : America knows the story of Apollo 13 mostly because of the
movie that was produced by Ron Howard and starred Tom Hanks. And of course you
were portrayed in that movie by Ed Harris, who made the phrase "Failure is not
an option" part of the language. How did you feel seeing yourself portrayed on
the big screen?
KRANZ: It was somewhat humbling. But let me give a comment that
if I were still working in Mission Control today, I would have offered Ed Harris
a job as flight director. Because I believe he really clearly portrayed the
flight director as the place where the buck stopped. You know, the flight
director's job description is to take any actions needed for crew safety and
mission success. And I liked the way Ed portrayed the role of the flight
director. And I liked the way that the young controllers were portrayed, as the
people who had to come up with the answers. They had to come up to the plate
hour after hour, and every time they came up to the plate, hit the home run. I
really liked the way they showed the young people of Mission
Control.
CHAIKIN: : So the film seemed accurate to you.
KRANZ: I believe that the film was really a spectacular portrayal
of the mission, the challenge, and the solutions that we had. There were a
couple of problems they left out that were a bit too difficult really to
portray. But the stuff they had in there was right, and it was right on
track.
CHAIKIN: : So, I have to ask you, Gene, since the movie has come out,
have you become a celebrity? Do people stop you on the street?
KRANZ: It's interesting. I especially -- I do a lot of traveling
nowadays. And I run into young kids in the airport. And it seems this movie
appealed to every generation. The generation that grew up in the '50s and '60s
that made it happen, their children -- who really were more interested in other
things during that era and now, all of a sudden, are looking back with nostalgia
to what their parents did. And then the young kids -- I do a lot of grade-school
sessions. And it's an absolute delight to work with these kids and see them
turned on by something that's real.
TIME TO STOP CELEBRATING THE PAST
CHAIKIN: : We don't know when anybody is going to go back to the moon
yet. Is that something that frustrates you?
KRANZ: Yeah. I think it's real frustrating. In fact, in the
military we'd say we've been marching in place for almost 30 years. It's time to
stop celebrating events of the past and start looking forward and making great
events happen in the future.
CHAIKIN: : Did you feel at the time, back when Apollo was -- they
were canceling some of the missions, you know, early in the -- in the progress
of the missions, they were canceling missions and cutting the program short. Was
that something that frustrated you at the time?
KRANZ: Yeah. I think it was, you know, as we got toward the final
three missions I would sit in my office and almost brood over the short-term
vision that as a nation that we had had. We had risen to probably one of the
greatest challenges in history, put a man on the moon in the decade. We'd
created incredible technologies. But what was most important, we'd created the
teams, what I call the human factor. People who were energized by a mission. And
these teams were capable of moving right on and doing anything America asked
them to do in space. And what we did is we watched these teams disappear. We
watched the great contractors -- the Grummans, the North Americans, the
Lockheeds -- disappear from the horizon. I think that's really sad that as
Americans we have destroyed much of this infrastructure that we had in the days
when we went to the moon.
LIFE AFTER NASA
CHAIKIN: : Gene, you stayed at NASA after Apollo. You were involved
in the Skylab missions, the space station in Earth orbit. And then, by the time
the space shuttle began flying in the early '80s, you were actually running the
whole flight operations division. You left NASA shortly after the Challenger
disaster in 1986. Why did you decide to give up your life in the space program?
KRANZ: I really had an opportunity to get back into aviation,
which was my first love. It was also time to move on. I had a great team in
place in Mission Control, and it was time to give some of those young people I
had, the chance to move into a role of leadership. And I believe that's part of
the business. It was time to hand over the baton.
GHOST OF PAST GLORY: NASA THEN AND NOW
CHAIKIN: : Do you feel that NASA has changed since the Apollo days?
Do you feel it's the same place that you remember?
KRANZ: No. In many ways we have the young people, we have the
talent, we have the imagination, we have the technology. But I don't believe we
have the leadership and the willingness to accept risk, to achieve great goals.
I believe we need a long-term national commitment to explore the universe. And I
believe this is an essential investment in the future of our nation -- and our
beautiful, but environmentally challenged planet.
SAVING THE SPACE PROGRAM
CHAIKIN: : Is there any way that you would suggest making that
happen?
KRANZ: I believe it's time to, first of all, get the American
public involved in the space program. We need grass-roots endorsement by the
American public to move back out in space. We need to revitalize NASA. We have
to create the environment of the original Space Task Group we had in the '60s.
We need some new top-level leadership, and we have to engage
Congress.
CHAIKIN: : Gene, before we go, I wonder if there's any one memory
that stands out for you in your entire space career, that you can share with
us.
KRANZ: About two and a half years behind the Russians in space.
And in those two and a half years, as a result of the leadership, the trust, the
teamwork and the values, we demonstrated that what Americans can dream,
Americans can do. And it was that intense feeling of pride in our nation that
really stands out as…strongest in my memory.
CHAIKIN: : Gene, I want to thank you very much for being with us today on SPACE.com's "Voyage."
KRANZ: Okay, Andy, and thanks a lot, and it's always a pleasure
to get together with you.
CHAIKIN: : Bye-bye.
KRANZ: Bye.
CHAIKIN: : My guest today has been Gene Kranz. He was a flight director during the Mercury, Gemini and Apollo years of America's space program, and he has a new book out called Failure is Not An Option. You're listening to SPACE.com's
"Voyage."
|
|
|