Hope for Water on Mars Dims with Sharp New Images

Hope for Water on Mars Dims with Sharp New Images
Boulders over northern lowland terrains on Mars. (Image credit: Science)

New imagesobtained by a sharp-eyed Martian satellite reveal that some Red Planet featuresonce thought to have been carved by flowing water were in fact created by otherprocesses.

The imageswere taken during the first 100 days of the MarsReconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) mission and are detailed in a special sectionof the Sept. 21 issue of the journal Science.?

While theresults don't confirm or deny the existence of liquid water on Mars' surface,they are no less fascinating, say the scientists involved. For instance, oneteam found no evidence that flowing water caused bright deposits on the planet.Instead, the scientists proposed dry landslides caused the deposits.

"Allfindings are good findings," said one team leader Alfred McEwen, aplanetary geologist at the University of Arizona.

PhilipChristensen of Arizona State University said the MRO results reiterate that"Mars has been fairly dry for the recent past and we need to be carefuland not overestimate how much water may have been present, or may have shapedthe surface" in ancient times.

"Ihave been a 'dry Mars guy' for a long time," Christensen said. "Thesefindings are basically saying you look at very high resolution and you do seesome evidence for water, there's no disputing that. But you don't see anoverwhelming amount of evidence for water."

"That entire surface is coated with a thin layer of solidified lava, very hard rock that's almost preserved the channel system," Jaeger said, adding: "Catastrophic water floods probably did carve the channel system, but lava flowed through it more recently."

"Whenwater and lava interact it causes a steam explosion," Jaeger told SPACE.com."And so the lava-covered ground had ground ice in it. And as that waterwas heated it exploded in steam explosions through the lava."

Bothchemical analyses and images of one of the fresh deposits showed no signs offrost or ice and no evidence for even hydrated minerals, all of which could have given the deposits a "bright" appearance.

"Wethink dry landsliding could've created the bright deposits," McEwen said.

In science,discrediting a theory can be just as important as supporting one. "Somescience reporters are acting as if we should be disappointed these new brightdeposits weren't deposited by water," McEwen said. "We're excited byany advance in understanding Mars no matter what it is."

"Ninety-ninepercent of Mars is pretty dry and pretty average and not all thatexciting," Christensen said. "But the one percent is extremely interesting. Soimagine stumbling across an oasis or hot spring out in the middle of a desert.It's a barren desert but gosh that little oasis sure looks attractive."

As anastrobiologist, Christensen says Mars holds plenty of hideoutsfor life, "I think there are still plenty of places to look forlife on Mars."

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Jeanna Bryner
Jeanna is the managing editor for LiveScience, a sister site to SPACE.com. Before becoming managing editor, Jeanna served as a reporter for LiveScience and SPACE.com for about three years. Previously she was an assistant editor at Science World magazine. Jeanna has an English degree from Salisbury University, a Master's degree in biogeochemistry and environmental sciences from the University of Maryland, and a science journalism degree from New York University. To find out what her latest project is, you can follow Jeanna on Google+.