CLEVELAND, OH --
Teams of NASA engineers and researchers are working feverishly to
reduce the risks associated with returning the space agency's shuttle
fleet to flight status and resuming International Space Station (ISS)
construction.
"We have a lot of work in
this arena to do," said Wayne Hale, NASA's space shuttle deputy manager at
Johnson Space Center in Houston, adding that risk will always be part of any
spaceflight. "We've brought the risk down a lot, but it's not [going to be] zero
at the end of the day."
Since the loss of the space
shuttle Columbia and its seven-astronaut crew during reentry on Feb. 1, 2003,
shuttle managers and engineers have worked not only to return its remaining
three space planes to flight, but to prevent such catastrophic
accidents.
Hale said the failure rate
for the space shuttle program has been two flights out of 113, and 14
lives. "My job
is to make sure it isn't three," he added.
Hale and
other NASA officials spoke during the agency's Risk Management Conference 2004
here at the space agency's Assurance Technology Center in the Ohio Aerospace
Institute.
Space
shuttle engineers are implementing a series of recommendations made by the
Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) to reduce mission risk, increase
spacecraft safety and reliability. The next shuttle launch, Discovery's STS-114,
is currently expected to launch sometime in May 2005.
The
prime risk concern, Hale said, is still the launch system's external tank and
efforts to eliminate the shedding of large pieces of insulating foam like that
which critically damaged Columbia.
But
there are also issues, such as developing the pedestals to hold a sensor-tipped
orbital boom that will allow astronauts to take a close look at the spacecraft's
thermal protection surfaces in orbit. While identical to the pedestals used for
the shuttle's robotic arm, 20-year-old technical drawings for the tools are hard
to read and have led to mis-machined parts.
"Prior to [Columbia] we
thought we had a robust risk management program, but we were obviously wrong,"
said John Turner, NASA's space shuttle program risk manager at Johnson Space
Center in Houston. In addition to managing risk in future flights, NASA must
also improve risk communication among its programs and the public, he added.
"We're
not there yet, but we're making progress," Turned said.
The space
station
In addition to
addressing risk with the space shuttle fleet, NASA must also work to lower risk
associated with the International Space Station.
"A major part
of the space station is maintenance," said NASA's Warren Pattison, deputy safety
and mission assurance manager. "That is the nature of our
business."
The grounding
of the shuttle fleet after the Columbia accident has halted space station
construction and limited extended expedition to two crewmembers instead of the
typical three. Despite the drop in crew, which is more favorable than an
unmanned ISS, the station's operational requirements have
not.
"We are trying
to maintain the station with what we have," Pattison
said.
During the last
four two-person ISS crews, ISS crews have worked outside an empty space station
for the first time, made complicated repairs on spacesuits and life support
equipment and performed an unprecedented spacewalk coordinating between U.S. and
Russian flight controllers.
But the
station's future still lies with the space shuttle, which is the only vehicle
large enough to deliver the remaining modules and trusses to orbit for
assembly.
"If we're going
to complete the space station, we're going to need the shuttle," Pattison said.
"It's going to take a lot of resources."