It's not likely that many people will see the total phase of Friday's
solar eclipse. Totality will be visible only from the middle of the South
Pacific Ocean and only for, at the very most, 42 seconds.
Only from an aircraft or the deck of a ship positioned precisely within the
very narrow (17-mile-wide) path of totality would observers get a brief glimpse
of a completely obscured Sun, one of nature's great spectacles.
It is a popular misconception that the phenomenon of a total eclipse of the
Sun is a rare occurrence. Quite the contrary, about once every 18 months, on
average, a total solar eclipse is visible from some place on the Earth's surface.
That's two totalities for every three years.
However, seeing a total eclipse of the Sun from a specific location is another
story altogether.
Shadowy details
On the average, the length of the Moon's shadow at New Moon is 232,100 miles
(373,530 kilometers), and the distance to the nearest point of the Earth's surface
234,900 miles (378,030 kilometers).
This means that when the Moon passes directly in front of the Sun, its shadow
will usually miss the Earth by some 2,800 miles (4,500 kilometers) and the eclipse
will merely be annular, with a dazzling ring of sunlight still visible around
the Moon's silhouette.
Of course we all know that total eclipses do occur, because the New Moon's
distance can vary between 217,730 miles (350,400 kilometers) and 247,930 miles
(399,000 kilometers) from the Earth's surface, on account of the Moon's elliptical
orbit.
As it turns out, the April
8 eclipse is one of those unusual hybrids where the eclipse is total over
only a part of its path and annular throughout the rest. Near and at the ends
of the path, the distance to the Moon is too great (owing to the curvature of
the Earth) for its dark cone of shadow (called the umbra) to touch the Earth's
surface. It's only near the middle of the eclipse track that the tip of the
umbra barely scrapes the Earth, changing the character of the eclipse from annular
into a total. Then, as the track approaches the Central American coast, the
umbra moves off the Earth's surface and the eclipse switches back to annular.
Of all solar eclipses, about 35 percent are partial; 32 percent annular; 28
percent total; but only 5 percent are hybrids.
So now, let's return to our original question: How often a total eclipse can
be seen from a specific point on the Earth's surface?
The science of prediction
Predicting the details of a solar eclipse requires not only a fairly good idea
of the motions of the Sun and Moon, but also an accurate distance to the Moon
and accurate geographical coordinates. Rough determinations of eclipse circumstances
became possible after the work of Claudius Ptolemy (around 150 A.D.), and diagrams
of the eclipsed Sun have been found in medieval manuscripts and in the first
books printed about astronomy.
Since the distance to the Moon varies, the width of the path of totality differs
from one eclipse to another. This width will change even during a single eclipse,
because different parts of the Earth lie at different distances from the Moon
and also because of geometrical effects as the shadow falls at an oblique angle
onto the Earth's surface.
In calculating a solar eclipse, one of the first steps is to determine the
shadow's relation to the "fundamental plane," which passes through
the Earth's center and is perpendicular to the Moon-Sun line. The path of the
axis of the shadow across this plane is virtually a straight line. It is from
this special geometry, that the intersection of the Moon's dark shadow cone
with the rotating spheroid of our Earth must be worked out, using lengthy procedures
in trigonometry. To say the least, these factors can make the calculations quite
involved (although today's high-speed PCs can effortlessly crunch the numbers,
making the task much easier).
In their classical textbook "Astronomy" (Boston, 1926), authors H.N.
Russell, R.S. Dugan and J.Q. Stewart noted that:
"Since the track of a solar eclipse is a very narrow path over the earth's
surface, averaging only 60 or 70 miles in width, we find that in the long run
a total eclipse happens at any given station only once in about 360 years."
|
Eclipse
Terms
|
|

Partial
eclipse: The Moon covers only part of the Sun.
Total
eclipse: The Moon covers the entire disk of the Sun along
a narrow path across the Earth.
Annular
eclipse: The Moon is too far from Earth to completely
cover the Sun. A thin ring of the Sun's disk surrounds the
Moon.
|
|
|
|
More recently, Jean Meeus of Belgium, whose special interest is spherical and
mathematical astronomy, recalculated this figure statistically on an HP-85 microcomputer
and found that the mean frequency for a total eclipse of the Sun for any given
point on the Earth's surface is once in 375 years. A value that is very close
to the figure that Russell, Dugan and Stewart arrived at.
Double check
Without retracing these computations, there is perhaps another way to check
the validity of these answers. In the table below, is a listing of 25 cities.
Twenty-three are in North America, plus two others: Honolulu, on the Hawaiian
Island of Oahu, and Hamilton, the Capital of Bermuda. Using two computer programs
designed to scan through the centuries for eclipses, I first searched for the
date of the most recent total solar eclipse that was visible from each city,
then searched for the date when the next total eclipse for that city would take
place.
But it should first be stressed that the nearly four-century wait is merely
a statistical average. Indeed, over a much shorter span of time, the paths of
different eclipses can sometimes criss-cross over a specific place, so in some
cases the wait might not be so long at all. In fact, a forty-mile stretch of
the Atlantic coast of Angola, just north of Lobito, experienced a total solar
eclipse on June 21, 2001 and was treated to another on Dec. 4, 2002, after less
than 18 months!
On the other hand, as Mr. Meeus recently discovered, some spots on the Earth's
surface may not see a total solar eclipse for 36 centuries (" . . . though
this must be exceedingly rare," he notes).
On our listing of 25 selected cities, how close would we come to the computed
mean-frequency of nearly 400-years between total eclipses?
Here is the list:
|
Location
|
Most recent totality
|
Next scheduled totality
|
Years between eclipses
|
|
Anchorage, AK
|
1943, February 4
|
2399, August 2*
|
456.5
|
|
Atlanta, GA |
1778, June 24 |
2078, May 11 |
299.9 |
|
Boston, MA
|
1959, October 2
|
2079, May 1
|
119.6
|
|
Calgary, Alberta |
1869, August 7 |
2044, August 23 |
175.0 |
|
Chicago, IL
|
1806, June 6*
|
2205, July 17
|
399.1
|
|
Dallas, TX |
1623, October 23 |
2024, April 8 |
401.5 |
|
Denver, CO
|
1878, July 29
|
2045, August 12
|
167.0
|
|
Halifax, Nova Scotia |
1970, March 7 |
2079, May 1 |
109.1 |
|
Hamilton, Bermuda
|
1532, August 30**
|
2352, February 16
|
819.5
|
|
Honolulu, HI |
1850, August 7 |
2252, December 31 |
402.4 |
|
Houston, TX
|
1259, October 17**
|
2200, April 14
|
940.5
|
|
Las Vegas, NV |
1724, May 22 |
2207, November 20 |
483.5 |
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
1724, May 22
|
3290, April 1
|
1,565.9
|
|
Mexico City, Mexico |
1991, July 11 |
2261, December 22 |
270.4 |
|
Miami, FL
|
1752, May 13*
|
2352, February 16
|
599.8
|
|
Montreal, Quebec
|
1932, August 31* |
2024, April 8* |
91.6 |
|
New Orleans, LA
|
1900, May 28
|
2078, May 11
|
178.0
|
|
New York, NY |
1925, January 24* |
2079, May 1 |
154.3 |
|
Phoenix, AZ
|
1806, June 16
|
2205, July 17
|
399.1
|
|
St. Louis, MO |
1442, July 7** |
2017, August 21 |
575.1 |
|
San Francisco, CA
|
1424, June 26**
|
2252, December 31
|
828.5
|
|
Seattle, WA |
1860, July 18 |
2645, May 17 |
784.8 |
|
Toronto, Ontario
|
1142, August 22**
|
2144, October 26
|
1,002.2
|
|
Washington, DC |
1451, June 28** |
2200, April 14 |
748.8 |
|
Winnipeg, Manitoba
|
1979, February 26
|
3356, September 16
|
1,377.6
|
A single asterisk (*) denotes that either the northern or southern limit of
the Moon's umbral shadow only grazes a specific city; only part of that metropolitan
area will see a total eclipse while the other part sees a partial eclipse. A
double asterisk (**) indicates a date when the now-defunct Julian Calendar was
in effect.
The average number of years between eclipses turned out to be nearly 534 years.
Considering our relatively small survey of 25 cities, this is reasonably close
to the once-in-almost four-century rule.
A botched opportunity
All of us who enjoy eclipses should be indebted to those astronomers who pioneered
doing these extensive calculations; otherwise we would not know exactly where
to position ourselves for the big event. Prussian astronomer Friedrich Bessel
introduced a group of mathematical formulas in 1824 (now called "Besselian
Elements") that greatly simplified the calculation of the position of the
Sun, Moon and Earth.
It is too bad that Bessel's procedures were not available in the late 18th
century, when Samuel Williams, a professor at Harvard, led an expedition to
Penobscot Bay, Maine to observe the total solar eclipse of Oct. 27, 1780. As
it turned out, this eclipse took place during the Revolutionary War and Penobscot
Bay lay behind enemy lines. Fortunately, the British granted the expedition
safe passage, citing the interest of science above political differences.
And yet in the end, it was all for naught.
Williams apparently made a fatal error in his computations and inadvertently
positioned his men at Islesboro - outside the path of totality - likely finding
this out with a heavy heart when the waning crescent of sunlight slid completely
around the dark edge of the Moon and started thickening!
|
|
Astronomy
for the
Entire Family!
Starry
Night software brings the universe to your desktop. Map the sky from
your location, or just sit back and let the cosmos come to you.
LEARN
MORE!
|
|
Joe Rao
serves as an instructor and guest lecturer at New York's Hayden Planetarium.
He writes about astronomy for The New York Times and other publications, and
he is also an on-camera meteorologist for News
12 Westchester, New York.