Ad Astra OnlineLiveScience.com HomepageStarryNight.comtelescope.com
  SEARCH:

advertisement


Charles Sheffield's 'Starfire' Has More Sputter Than Spark
By Chris Aylott

Special to space.com

posted: 11:06 am ET
02 December 1999

Charles Sheffield's 'Starfire' Has More Sputter Than Spark Starfire takes so long to introduce the characters and get the plot rolling that it's hard to believe it's a direct sequel to Charles Sheffield's previous book, Aftermath.

Some of the lengthy introduction is probably dictated by Starfire's complicated scenario. It's 2053, nearly three decades after the events of Aftermath, in which Earth's civilization was nearly destroyed by the gamma ray burst caused by Alpha Centauri going supernova.


   More Stories

'Blue Light' Shines by Transcending Novelty


'Bios' Finds Life in Old Genre


'The Radon File' Drowns in Gloom


'Half Life' Succeeds by Breaking Rules

   Related Links

Charles Sheffield

Humanity has largely recovered from this disaster, but supernovas throw out more than radiation. As the new book opens, a high-energy particle storm is racing toward the solar system at a respectable fraction of the speed of light, due to strike Earth in about six months.

This time, humanity's a little better prepared, building a gigantic space shield to deflect the particles, but there are complications. A serial killer is stalking the space station where the shield is being built, and new data suggests that the storm is stronger and traveling faster than the previous models predicted.

Several survivors of Aftermath return for the sequel, but the passage of time has changed their lives significantly -- for instance, Mars astronaut Celine Tanaka is now President of the United States. The changes let familiar characters take on new roles, but it also means Sheffield has to spend a lot of time bringing us up to date.

Slow going
Unfortunately, the current story isn't worth the effort, and the slow start carries through to the end without great improvement. Most of the scenes consist of characters analyzing data or planning their next move, and there's very little action.
Moreover, the book is a hodgepodge of plot threads, many unrelated. The serial killer thread in particular would have been more interesting as a separate novella, but really has no clear thematic connection with anything else in the book.

Despite these entanglements, the basic plot is also painfully straightforward. There are very few twists or surprises, mostly involving the oncoming particle storm. Every few chapters, the characters learn something new about the storm and modify their plans for dealing with it, but otherwise, everything they do works just the way they expect it to.

This narrative approach can work out in itself, but it nearly ruins the serial killer subplot. Using a technique that was already irritating in the days of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Sheffield allows the detectives to figure out who the killer is in a moment of inspiration halfway through the book, but fails to provide adequate clues to let the reader follow along.

Worse, clues in the second half of the book make the killer's identity obvious. Since the detective figured it out chapters ago (using databases that aren't available to the reader) this obvious information simply deflates the "climactic" unmasking scene, which proceeds exactly as the heroes planned.

It's lousy mystery plotting, which is too bad, because the diary entries that make up the bulk of this subplot are the most entertainingly written sections of the book.

Science, character fail to thrill
There isn't much else to be excited about. The only character that changes or grows is Maddy Wheatstone, a corporate manager who rediscovers her idealism in her admiration of super-engineer John Hyslop.

Even the particle storm fails to generate much suspense, conveniently concentrating its wrath on the Southern Hemisphere, home to only one character. This is the first disaster novel I've seen where most of the characters aren't wiped out by the disaster.

Most of this would be forgivable given sufficiently interesting science, the great saving grace of the hard SF subgenre, but that's not the case here.

Sheffield's discussions of particle physics and space engineering are fun to read, but the secrets of Alpha Centauri's explosion are so contrived that it's impossible to make any connection to them. The author tries hard to create a sense of wonder, but he doesn't quite keep his scientific feet on the ground while he reaches for the stars. His explanations don't feel plausible enough for hard SF, rendering the ending anticlimactic.

Starfire isn't a terrible book. If you can get past the slow beginning it's even moderately entertaining. I just wish it had been half as long and twice as interesting.


Chris Aylott is co-owner of the Space-Crime Continuum, a science fiction and mystery bookstore


     about us | FREE Email Newsletter | message boards | register at SPACE.com | contact us | advertise | terms of service | privacy statement      DMCA/Copyright

     © Imaginova Corp. All rights reserved.