• TechMediaNetwork
  • LiveScience
  • SPACE.com
  • Newsarama
  • TopTenREVIEWS
advertisement
Why We Must Still Go Boldly
Grieving Columbia Families: 'Exploration of Space Must Go On'
Shuttle Columbia Crew Doing Well, Studies Calcium Loss
Would a Rose Aboard Shuttle Columbia Smell as Sweet?
Lives Lost, Lives Saved: The Benefits of Shuttle Science
By Robert Roy Britt
Senior Science Writer
posted: 12:40 pm ET
04 February 2003

The Columbia mission STS-107 was billed all along as a science marathon

In the grim wake of the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster, space experts, politicians and individuals debate the value of human space flight weighed against the cost in dollars and human lives. It is a cold, hard equation infused with tremendous emotion.

Factor in this: Experiments done by the Columbia astronauts will lead to improved earthquake safety, cleaner air, better human health and will save lives.

Unlike most shuttle missions that serve the International Space Station, STS-107 was a marathon scientific undertaking, with dozens of investigations ranging from tumor growth to global climate change, all work that can't be carried out on Earth. Though much of the valuable data and specimens were lost in the disaster, a remarkable amount was downloaded to ground computers during the mission.

The astronauts were, in fact, scientists. Their names will appear in future scientific papers that result from research done during the 16-day mission.

The price they paid for science was terrible, all agree. But even the families of the astronauts said the explorers left Earth with "a willingness to accept risk in the pursuit of knowledge -- knowledge that might improve the quality of life for all mankind." Amid their grief, the families also said "the bold exploration of space must go on," according to a statement released yesterday by NASA.

The air we breathe

University of Michigan aerospace engineer Gerard Faeth led a Columbia experiment designed to learn how soot and other pollutants are produced in the burning of fuel used for everything from diesel trucks to coal-fired power planets and jet airliners.

"The research has significant potential applications to saving lives and improving health on Earth," Faeth said in a telephone interview.

Soot consists of tiny particles: 200 hundred of them side-by-side are about as wide as a human hair. Other harmful substances like carbon monoxide glom onto soot, and the whole mess can lodge in your lungs.

Several studies confirm that airborne soot is responsible for 60,000 premature deaths every year, Faeth said. Soot also aggravates asthmatics and others with lung deficiencies.

It is unclear why solid particles -- rather than gases -- are produced in the high temperatures of combustion. The process is nearly impossible to study on the ground. Here's why: In a campfire, soot is responsible for the yellow flames. They flicker about wildly, making observations difficult. A candle flame is steadier, but it is highly affected by Earth's gravity, so it does not behave like other combustion flames.

In the shuttle test, candle flames grew six to 10 times larger than on Earth and were therefore useful models for standard combustion flames.

About half the data was downloaded before the shuttle came apart over Texas.

Faeth led similar work aboard two shuttle flights in 1997. Though more research is needed, he is on the trail of devising new, cleaner combustion methods that industry could then apply.

"We think we're pretty close to getting some ways to inhibit the formation of soot," he said.

Various schemes were to be tested this summer in a series of experiments slated for the International Space Station. The tests would attempt to take standard soot-emitting fires and turn them into pure, blue flames, Faeth said.

Those experiments will likely be delayed, however, as NASA is forced in the short term to focus on safely swapping crews at the space station.

Doing science in space involves an immense amount of advance planning. Faeth trained the Columbia crew for two years. Israeli astronaut Ilan Ramon did more than half the work for Faeth's study. Mike Anderson, Dave Brown and Kalpana Chawla all helped out. Faeth said the names of each would be included in scientific papers he expects to produce based on the research.

"As valuable as these results are, however, they pale beside the importance of the lives of seven courageous and extraordinarily gifted individuals, and our sadness seeing the sorrow of their families as a result of their loss," Faeth said.

Other experiments

Columbia's science marathon involved other health-related experiments. One studied how new muscle is created. It was a total loss, however, as it would have relied on measurements of the astronauts after the mission. Other work examined prostate tumor growth; at least some of that data was returned.

The Columbia astronauts also worked on non-health science projects.

One series of tests considered how waterlogged soil behaves in an earthquake. The temporary destabilization known to occur was responsible for a significant chunk of the damage in a large 1989 earthquake in the San Francisco Bay Area.

University of Colorado researcher Stein Sture said about 90 percent of this data was returned. Counting the loss of the actual specimens, he figures the overall effort was about 60 percent successful.

"We have enough data to improve our understand of what happens" when soil becomes slurry in an earthquake, Sture told SPACE.com, and he said the results would "definitely" help save lives as engineers develop better methods for anchoring bridges and buildings.

Sture and his colleagues spent a lot of time with the Columbia crew before the mission, both professionally and socially.

"The astronauts were terrific persons," he said, "good natured, highly accomplished, dedicated, helpful and tireless in their efforts to make certain that everything went well and that a maximum amount of science was successfully achieved. We mourn the loss of very close colleagues and friends."

The Mediterranean Israeli Dust Experiment (MEIDEX) examined how dust might affect the global climate. Some of the data was beamed back to the ground. A NASA spokesperson said Tuesday that scientists were going over what they had and would announce later in the week how much data had been obtained.

A MEIDEX camera also made images of above-cloud electrical emissions during nighttime thunderstorms. These sprites, as they are called, sometimes soar above normal lightning discharges and tickle the fringes of space. Little is known about them.

Another experiment intended to improve methods of extinguishing fires in space and on the ground was considered a success.

Fred Sack, an Ohio State University researcher, had spent a decade designing an experiment to look at how moss grows without the influence of gravity. His data had not been downloaded and was, instead, all aboard the shuttle.

Sack was at Cape Canaveral Saturday morning, waiting for Columbia to land so he could collect his data. When the tragedy became apparent, he was of course dismayed at the loss of science, but Sack's reaction was wholly human.

"These are people who did a remarkable job assisting us in our research and we will miss them," Sack a couple of hours after the tragedy.

More Columbia Science: Archive of all stories while the shuttle was in space

 

Digital Download 5.7 Data Module: Space Mission Probes
$9.95
Explore More


















Site Map | News | SpaceFlight | Science | Technology | Entertainment | SpaceViews | NightSky | Ad Astra | SETI | Hot Topics
Image Galleries | Videos | Reader Favorites | Image of the Day | Amazing Images | Wallpapers | Games | Community | Reviews
about us | FREE Email Newsletter | message boards | register at SPACE.com | contact us | advertise with us | terms & conditions | privacy statement
DMCA/Copyright
  What is This?