Scientists create 5 new isotopes to learn how neutron star collisions forge gold

An illustration shows the collision of two neutron stars. Scientists had proposed that such collisions might have filled our solar system with gold, but new research casts doubt on that claim.
An illustration shows the collision of two neutron star an event that synethesizes the universe's heaviest elements (Image credit: NASA/Swift/Dana Berry)

Researchers have synthesized five new isotopes that could help bring the stars down to Earth — and coax scientists a step closer to understanding how collisions between ultra-dense, dead stars could create heavy elements like gold and silver. 

The isotopes are Thulium-182, thulium-183, ytterbium-186, ytterbium-187 and lutetium-190; this is the first time they've been ever been synthesized on Earth. Their creation took place at the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB) at Michigan State University (MSU) and represents a step towards building atoms on Earth that are typically only created in the ultra-turbulent environment around merging dead stars known as neutron stars.

"That's the exciting part," Alexandra Gade, FRIB scientific director and a professor in MSU's Department of Physics and Astronomy, said in a statement. "We are confident we can get even closer to those nuclei that are important for astrophysics."

Related: What happens when neutron stars collide? Astronomers may finally know

What's an isotope?

Each chemical element of the periodic table is defined by the number of protons in its atomic nuclei. For example, hydrogen always has one proton, helium always has two, and iron has 26. Hydrogen can't have two protons, and iron can't have 25; if they did, they wouldn't be hydrogen or iron anymore. 

However, protons are joined in atomic nuclei by neutrons, and the number of these particles can vary without changing the nature of an element. Nuclei with varying numbers of neutrons are called isotopes of an element. So, isotopes of iron include iron-54 with 26 protons and 28 neutrons, iron-56 with 26 protons and 30 neutrons, and iron-57 with 26 protons and 31 neutrons.

The five newly synthesized isotopes are exciting, though, because they aren't commonly occurring on our planet. In fact, they have never even been found on our planet before.

"This is probably the first time these isotopes have existed on the surface of the Earth," Bradley Sherrill, University Distinguished Professor in MSU's College of Natural Science and head of the Advanced Rare Isotope Separator Department at FRIB, said in the statement. "I like to draw the analogy of taking a journey. We've been looking forward to going somewhere we've never been before, and this is the first step. We've left home, and we're starting to explore."

The five new isotopes synthesized by  at the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams at Michigan State University. (Image credit: FRIB/MSU)

Superheavy isotopes and superheavy elements

Stars in general can be thought of as nuclear furnaces that forge the elements of the universe, beginning with the fusion of hydrogen to helium, which is then fused to forge nitrogen, oxygen and carbon. 

The most massive stars in our universe can forge elements in the periodic table all the way up to iron, but scientists believe even these powerful stellar furnaces aren't sufficient enough to create elements heavier than that. But, what if two stars join their furnaces? And rather violently at that?

The thing is, when dying, massive stars are left with their cores of iron that can no longer fuse into heavier elements, the energy that has supported these stars against the inward push of their own gravitational influences also ceases. This causes the cores to collapse as the outer layers are blasted away by powerful supernova explosions.

This collapse can be halted, however, when the electrons and protons in these cores have been transformed into a sea of neutrons, which are prevented from cramming together by an aspect of quantum physics called "degeneracy." This degeneracy pressure can be overcome if a stellar core has enough mass, resulting in a complete collapse and creating a black hole. But sometimes there isn't enough mass. Those remain as dead, superdense neutron stars.

Furthermore, the end of this process doesn't mark the end of nuclear fusion for neutron stars if they happen to exist in a binary system with another massive star that also eventually collapsed to birth a neutron star. As these ultradense stars with masses between one and two times that of the sun crammed into the width of around 12 miles (20 kilometers) orbit around each other, they emit ripples in spacetime called gravitational waves.

Those gravitational waves carry away angular momentum from the system, causing the neutron stars to draw together and emit more gravitational waves at greater intensities. This continues until the two eventually smash together.

Unsurprisingly, given their extreme nature, the collisions of binary neutron stars create a very violent environment. The event sprays out neutron-rich matter, for instance, and that matter is believed to be important to the synthesis of gold and other heavy elements.

That's because these free neutrons can be grabbed by other atomic nuclei in the environment in what is called the rapid capture process or "r-process." These greedy atomic nuclei then grow heavier, creating superheavy isotopes that are unstable. Those unstable isotopes are expected to ultimately decay into stable elements, like gold, that are lighter than superheavy elements but still heavier than iron.

"It's not certain, but people think that all of the gold on Earth was made in neutron star collisions," Sherrill said. As a matter of fact, the James Webb Space Telescope recently found the best evidence yet for the theory.

So, how do we learn whether this process occurs with certainty? 

If scientists could recreate the superheavy elements involved in the r-process, they could better understand the creation of gold and other heavy elements. Alas, the creation of Thulium-182, thulium-183, ytterbium-186, ytterbium-187 and lutetium-190. These isotopes, formed by firing a beam of platinum ions at a target of carbon at FRIB, might not be present in the wreckage of neutron star collisions, but their existence on Earth is definitely a step toward creating those briefly lived transitional superheavy elements on our planet to see if they result in elements like gold.

Down the line, a better understanding of these newly forged isotopes could also have important implications for nuclear physics. 

"It's not a big surprise that these isotopes exist, but now that we have them, we have colleagues who will be very interested in what we can measure next," Gade concluded. "I'm already starting to think of what we can do next in terms of measuring their half-lives, their masses, and other properties."

The team's research was published on Thursday (Feb. 15) in the journal Physical Review Letters.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Robert Lea
Senior Writer

Robert Lea is a science journalist in the U.K. whose articles have been published in Physics World, New Scientist, Astronomy Magazine, All About Space, Newsweek and ZME Science. He also writes about science communication for Elsevier and the European Journal of Physics. Rob holds a bachelor of science degree in physics and astronomy from the U.K.’s Open University. Follow him on Twitter @sciencef1rst.

  • Classical Motion
    I think man is making these heavy isotopes the hard way. I don't believe that the heavy isotopes were forged, I think they were cracked.

    Kinda hard to believe isn't it? Where and how would huge atoms be formed to where all of our heavy isotopes are cracked from?

    More science fiction? No, just a physical way of looking at matter. Electrons and protons are ring shaped. The protons are small rings and the electrons are larger rings. One of the functions of the sun is to make neutrons. It does this by a huge flux of particle accelerations. A portion of those are such that a proton is place in the center of the electron. They are now co-planar in their rotation. It's a dipole that is closed and locked. It can not vibrate, it wobbles. The E fields are neutralized but the M field is superpositioned. Locked.

    A heavy flux of neutrons is all that is needed to form very large nuclei. Heavy atoms don't have one nucleus, they have multiple nuclei. They are plate like structures. The largest plates has 10 P 10 E and 10 N. The largest plates are on the outside of atomic structure, the smaller plates inside.

    Inside neutron flux, very large atoms could be formed with gravity. The fields are neutralized. Of which all the heavy atoms can be cracked from. A portion of the neutrons are unlocked and the familiar nuclei we see are there.

    From some kind of neutron flux source. Ponder ponder.

    Heavy atoms weren't welded, they were cracked.
    Reply
  • DrRaviSharma
    Dear Classical Motion

    Are you suggesting that these rings are based on string theory or on observations?

    The former is more plausible and gravitation playing a part when both of these have masses is probable and likely, but the same can not be said about the massless quanta.

    The nucleus does not have to be constrained to wobble only, even when it has spin, it can vibrate (more precisely its constituents n, p, outside e, and photon which can be - inside as Gamma and outside as Xray or other frequencies).

    Regarding isotopes and isobars and new elements there is lot of confusion because we need to talk about decay lifetimes. We are happy to stand on this solid earth made possible by outer shell of nucleus and atom around it, with long decay lifetime of proton.

    Short decay life transuranic elements were transients and many synthesized at Lawrence Berkeley Labs, hence such many combinations are possible in Solar fusion region as well as in colliding neutron stars. It is more about their decay life?

    What do you mean by "Heavy atoms weren't welded, they were cracked." are you implying a super-nucleus?
    Regards.
    Ravi
    (Dr. Ravi Sharma, Ph.D. USA)
    NASA Apollo Achievement Award
    ISRO Distinguished Service Awards
    Former MTS NASA HQ MSEB Apollo
    Former Scientific Secretary ISRO HQ
    Ontolog Board of Trustees
    Particle and Space Physics
    Senior Enterprise Architect
    SAE Fuel Cell Tech Committee voting member for 20 years.
    http://www.linkedin.com/in/drravisharma
    Reply
  • Classical Motion
    No. That's one of the problems I have explaining this model. The model I use had it's start with Parson's Magneton 1915. But there are so many alternate theories now, it's hard to keep separate.

    These new alternate matter and gravity theories try new ways to explain our measurements.

    My model is a physical model and must be explained physically. This model shows physical cause for all particle properties. It shows the structure and the motion that ratios these properties.

    This model shows the error in our measurements. And the error in our narratives. And what particle properties truly are.

    It replaces the standard model with a much simpler explanation for mass and matter.

    I was explaining the wobble of the neutron, not the nucleus. That wobble is the cause of decay. The neutron is the only composite particle.

    Electrons and protons never decay. But they can be dis-integrated.

    And yes that's what I mean by cracked. From a super nucleus.

    But my model is a lot different than any other. It probably doesn't make too much sense without a diagram.

    I apologize. I can explain further if interested.
    Reply
  • DrRaviSharma
    Dear Classical Motion
    For now I am able to understand what you are proposing, and as the name suggests, it is a classical approach. Is it consistent with MOND?
    We need to pick this thread again later but will your theory not accept that both n, p, and (according to me) e are all composite particles.
    Regards.
    Ravi
    (Dr. Ravi Sharma, Ph.D. USA)
    NASA Apollo Achievement Award
    ISRO Distinguished Service Awards
    Former MTS NASA HQ MSEB Apollo
    Former Scientific Secretary ISRO HQ
    Ontolog Board of Trustees
    Particle and Space Physics
    Senior Enterprise Architect
    SAE Fuel Cell Tech Committee voting member for 20 years.
    http://www.linkedin.com/in/drravisharma
    Reply