Big Space Station Can Have Big Malfunctions

Likeany big machine, the huge International Space Station requires dailymaintenance repairs to keep flying in space. But every now and then somethingbig or critical ? like the recent cooling system trouble ? pops up to shine aspotlight on the $100 billion space station, which has been continuously mannedby astronauts for nearly 10 years.

Halfof the spacestation's cooling system shut down late Saturday when a circuit breakertripped in a pump used to move super-cold liquid ammonia through the system.Now astronauts living aboard the station are planning two emergency spacewalks,currently set for Thursday and Sunday, to replace the pump in the afflictedcooling system line ? called Loop A.  

Here'sa look, by no means comprehensive, at some recent notable malfunctions duringthe space station's 10 years in orbit:

TheProgress 38 cargo ship was flying on autopilot as designed on July 2 when itunexpectedly aborted the docking attempt and missedthe space station.  Russian engineers suspect interference between thespacecraft's Kurs automated docking system and a space station system thatallows cosmonauts to take remote control of the Progress spacecraft caused the abort.

Thespace station's Loop A cooling system has seen some glitches before.  InApril, a stuck valve sent NASA engineers scrambling to come up with a fix whilethe space shuttle Discovery was docked at the orbiting lab.

Engineersdidn't immediately fix the valve, but after studyingthe space malfunction exhaustively they did decide the glitch didn't posean immediate problem. The crew of Endeavour did not have to perform an extraspacewalk and were able to depart the space station in mid-April as planned. 

Thespace station's toilets and related life support equipment have also had theirshare of troubles.

Inrecent years, the space station's high-tech toilet has had several glitches dueto faulty pumps and other problems. Most recently, one of two spacetoilets on the station flooded in July 2009 because of a faulty separatorpump and control panel.

Relatedto the space toilet issues are glitches in the station's urine recyclingsystem, which is part of a larger water purification system. A spinningcentrifuge-like component has been the culprit for most of the malfunctions andrequired replacement in 2008 and 2009.

Thespace station's water recycling system is also tied into a U.S. oxygen generator,which can separate new water into hydrogen and oxygen to boost the station'satmosphere. The system, and its Russian counterpart Elektron, have experiencedbreakdowns from time to time and been repaired.

InJanuary 2004, slow airleak that perplexed NASA for weeks sent astronauts hunting through thespace station for its cause.  After checking several different systems, aflexible hose used as a makeshift handhold near a window was identified as itscause and repaired.

In2006, a small leak of toxic potassium hydroxide in the space station's RussianElektron oxygen generator, which overheated a connected rubber seal to create asmoke-like smell that set off a brief fire scare on the space station. Openflames are not allowed on the space station because of such a fire risk.

OnFeb. 20, a brief maincomputer failure on the space station knocked out communications betweenthe laboratory and Mission Control for about an hour. A software glitch relatedto how data was sent to Earth from the station's European-built Columbus labwas the prime suspect.

InJune 2007, a majorfailure within the six-computer navigation and control system in charge ofthe Russian segment of the space station left the station without the use ofits Russian attitude control thrusters, Elektron oxygen generator and othersupport equipment. A carbon dioxide scrubber and other environmental controlsystems were also offline and temperatures inside the station's Russian-builtZvezda service module (where the computers are located) rose to around 80degrees Fahrenheit.

InApril 2001, a computer crash in the U.S. Destiny laboratory forced MissionControl to reroute communications through the shuttle Endeavour, which wasvisiting at the time. A failed hard drive in one of Destiny's three command andcontrol computers was identified as the cause and replaced.

Oneof the most dramatic International Space Station glitches in recent yearsinvolved rip in one of the orbiting lab's expansive solar arrays used to powerthe orbiting lab.

InOctober 2007, one of the space station's port side solar wings rippedwhile being unfurled by astronauts using a workstation inside the orbitinglaboratory.  The malfunction forced NASA mission planners to overhaulmission plans for space shuttle Discovery astronauts, who were visiting at thetime.

Toreach the torn spot, spacewalking astronaut Scott Parazynski had to stand atthe end of a 50-foot (15-meter) inspection boom attached to the end of thestation's robotic arm. The boom was part of the space shuttle Discovery andused for heat shield inspections.

"Whatan accomplishment, beautiful," Parazynski said at the time. "It's astaut as a sail. Everything looks completely intact."

During thatsame Discovery shuttle mission, astronauts discovered metal shavings gumming upa huge paddlewheel-like joint that turns the space station's outboard starboardsolar arrays. The metal shavings were apparently caused by wear on the joint'smain ring.

The failureof big parts on the space station can be a problem as well. Some of spacestation's vital large components are the space station's control momentgyroscopes ? big spinning devices used to change the station's position inspace without the use of rocket thrusters.

Each of thegyroscopes weighs about 600-pound (272-kilogram) and they are so large onlyNASA's space shuttles are large enough to deliver new ones, so orderingreplacements isn't easy. The space station can maintain its position with onlytwo working gyroscopes if required.

Theentire space station experienced an expectedly strong vibration on Jan. 14,2009. The space shudder was so strong it shook items off the walls during anotherwise routine maneuver to boost the outpost's orbit.

Afteran analysis, space station mission managers said later that the shaking eventdid not damage the space station. But at the time it was a dramatic event forthe space station's crew, which was commanded by veteran NASA astronaut MichaelFincke at the time.

"Wewere definitely surprised," Fincke told SPACE.com from the spacestation Feb. 5, 2009 after the shaking event. "It's not usual during areboost to see anything come off the walls."

Click here for SPACE.com's complete International Space Station missioncoverage.

Tariq Malik
Editor-in-Chief

Tariq is the award-winning Editor-in-Chief of Space.com and joined the team in 2001. He covers human spaceflight, as well as skywatching and entertainment. He became Space.com's Editor-in-Chief in 2019. Before joining Space.com, Tariq was a staff reporter for The Los Angeles Times covering education and city beats in La Habra, Fullerton and Huntington Beach. He's a recipient of the 2022 Harry Kolcum Award for excellence in space reporting and the 2025 Space Pioneer Award from the National Space Society. He is an Eagle Scout and Space Camp alum with journalism degrees from the USC and NYU. You can find Tariq at Space.com and as the co-host to the This Week In Space podcast on the TWiT network. To see his latest project, you can follow Tariq on Twitter @tariqjmalik.