Stars with superpowered magnetic fields could narrow the search for alien life

An illustration shows a small star bursting with activity, including sunspots and flares caused by magnetic fields.
An illustration shows a small star bursting with activity, including sunspots and flares caused by magnetic fields. (Image credit: Mark A. Garlick)

Astronomers have discovered evidence of small stars with shockingly strong magnetic fields that might not be ideal hosts for habitable worlds. The findings could reveal a strange stellar evolution process and teach scientists more about such common, but mysterious, cosmic bodies. 

This new research suggests unexpectedly intense magnetic fields arise around cool, small stars when the surfaces and interiors of those stars start out by rotating at the same speed but, over time, drift apart and spin out of sync. The team behind the study calls that internal mechanism core-envelope decoupling, a process that could ultimately impact our search for life elsewhere in the Milky Way

"Stellar physics can have surprising implications for other fields," Lyra Cao, team lead and an astronomy graduate student at Ohio State University, said in a statement. "Stars experiencing this enhanced magnetism are likely going to be battering their planets with high-energy radiation. This effect is predicted to last for billions of years on some stars, so it’s important to understand what it might do to our ideas of habitability."

That radiation could roast nearby planets, potentially boil away their liquid water, prevent complex molecules from forming and thus inhibit key ingredients for life. 

The findings are therefore surprising because low-mass stars, such as the ones observed by the team, are common and expected to often host exoplanets. But, rather than discourage the search for alien life, this work can suggest which systems are more likely to host habitable worlds. It can simply redirect the hunt.

Related: Good news for the alien life hunt: Buried oceans may be common on icy exoplanets

A different kind of stellar dynamo

For mid-sized stars, like the sun, surface magnetism is linked to stellar spin like a stellar dynamo. This means stellar spins can be used to assess physical properties of stars, such as their magnetic fields, and can reveal more about how stellar bodies interact with their environment,  such as their surrounding exoplanets.

Until now, astrophysicists had assumed the magnetism of stars with masses lower than the sun's, which can rotate very rapidly or very slowly, worked in the same way. This prompted scientists to theorize that small stars likely had weak magnetic fields, which suggests these stars would be ideal hosts for habitable worlds. 

However, there was a caveat.

There are examples in which this "stellar-spin clock" appears to have stopped, Cao pointed out. As stars age, their rotation slows because they lose angular momentum, a process called "spinning down."  

Something is buzzing in the Beehive cluster (pictured) with its small stars showing unexpectedly powerful magnetic fields  (Image credit: Fried Lauterbach/Wikimedia Commons)

Cao and research co-author Marc Pinsonneault, a professor of astronomy at Ohio State University, developed a new way of measuring starspots that arise as the result of stars' magnetic activity. This allowed them to characterize stellar magnetic fields.

The duo and their colleagues looked at Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data regarding 136 stars in an open stellar cluster called "the Beehive cluster," or Messier 44 (M44), which is located about 610 light years from Earth. This analysis revealed that some low-mass stars in the Beehive cluster held magnetic fields stronger than expected — if small stars have dynamos that work like that of the sun, that is.

Previous research had determined that some stars in the Beehive Cluster demonstrate rotational anomalies that defy current models of stellar evolution —these findings show magnetic fields in the open cluster also defy expectations. 

"To see a link between the magnetic enhancement and rotational anomalies was incredibly exciting," Cao said. "It indicates that there might be some interesting physics at play here."

She and the team think that as the star's core and its outer layer decouple in terms of spin speed and then sync back up, that could drive a type of magnetism seen around these small stars that is strikingly different from that of the sun.

"We're finding evidence that there's a different kind of dynamo mechanism driving the magnetism of these stars," said Cao. "The next thing to do is verify that enhanced magnetism happens on a much larger scale. If we can understand what's going on in the interiors of these stars as they experience shear-enhanced magnetism, it's going to lead the science in a new direction."

The team's research was published on July 17 in the Astrophysical Journal Letters.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Robert Lea
Senior Writer

Robert Lea is a science journalist in the U.K. whose articles have been published in Physics World, New Scientist, Astronomy Magazine, All About Space, Newsweek and ZME Science. He also writes about science communication for Elsevier and the European Journal of Physics. Rob holds a bachelor of science degree in physics and astronomy from the U.K.’s Open University. Follow him on Twitter @sciencef1rst.

  • billslugg
    Plasma physics is very hard to comprehend due to:
    - It is recursive. Changing electric field creates changing magnetic field which creates a changing electric field and another changing magnetic field and so on. - Charged particles are pushed at right angles to magnetic fields.
    - The forces due to charges are 10^41 times stronger than the gravitational forces at work.
    - 1840 times difference in mass between positive particles (mostly protons) and negative particles (mostly electrons) thus huge mobility differences
    Reply
  • Helio
    This report seems consistent with the known tantrums issued by the fiesty red dwarf class of stars. It will be great to see their spots, once we can.

    But red dwarfs live a long life, so the question becomes whether life could emerge when, and if, they settle down. It seems obvious that such life is less likely given the abuse any planet would have endured under those stellar activities.
    Reply
  • billslugg
    Perhaps life will learn to live deep underground to avoid surface variability.

    Certainly an abundance of high energy charged particles to encourage nearly any chemical reaction. Life might live in underground conduits like geysers have.
    Reply
  • Helio
    billslugg said:
    Perhaps life will learn to live deep underground to avoid surface variability.

    Certainly an abundance of high energy charged particles to encourage nearly any chemical reaction. Life might live in underground conduits like geysers have.
    Yes, good point. There is interesting argument that favors life having begun at ocean vents.

    But advanced life forms might need a terrestrial evolutionary path. So perhaps the greater chances are with the, say, F7 to K9 star types. K9 stars, however, might limit upper evolution to some sort of canine animal. ;)
    Reply
  • billslugg
    If we assume advanced intelligence, certainly local zoning laws would preclude any sort of vicious dog. Building codes would be Cat 5 stellar outburst resistant.
    Reply
  • Helio
    We used to mock cave men, but they may have been the wisest.
    Reply
  • billslugg
    A big gamma ray burst might kill all the humans except those deep underground in the gold mines. They would surface to find a landscape of complete death. The cockroaches would be in charge. It would be payback time. They would take all the good tables at the finer restaurants. Humans would have a short lived feast on dead animals but there would be no new food. Seeds would not sprout. They'd be screwed. We'd be dead. We wouldn't care.
    Reply
  • rod
    From the paper cited, Core-envelope Decoupling Drives Radial Shear Dynamos in Cool Stars, https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/acd780, 17-July-2023. “Abstract Differential rotation is thought to be responsible for the dynamo process in stars like our Sun, driving magnetic activity and starspots. We report that starspot measurements in the Praesepe open cluster are strongly enhanced only for stars that depart from standard models of rotational evolution. A decoupling of the spin-down history between the core and envelope explains both the activity and rotation anomalies: surface rotational evolution is stalled by interior angular momentum redistribution, and the resultant radial shears enhance starspot activity. These anomalies provide evidence for an evolving front of shear-enhanced activity affecting the magnetic and rotational evolution of cool stars and the high-energy environments of their planetary companions for hundreds of millions to billions of years on the main sequence.”

    My note, from the 10-page PDF report on page 6. “We show in this work that core-envelope decoupling and stalled spin down are linked, producing observables not only in angular momentum evolution but also in activity. The existence of shear-enhanced magnetism suggests that stellar mixing processes can persist for hundreds of millions to billions of years—consistent with models where waves are the primary mechanism linking the cores and envelopes of stars. Evolutionary models will need to include core-envelope decoupling and angular momentum losses from dynamos with large coreenvelope shears to obtain accurate rotation-based ages on the main sequence. Habitability models will need to be informed by the enhanced magnetism associated with core-envelope decoupling as shear-enhanced activity can last for billions of
    years in low-mass stars. Decoupling signals in activity and rotation are strongly mass- and age-dependent and are potential age diagnostics for low-mass main-sequence stars, where there are other age indicators are scarce.”

    My note from the paper, “Habitability models will need to be informed by the enhanced magnetism associated with core-envelope decoupling as shear-enhanced activity can last for billions of
    years in low-mass stars.” Seems there is plenty to chew on now for smaller stars having habitable exoplanets, if any. Rogue planets are back in the news too. If rogue planets are everywhere, how could we explore them?, https://phys.org/news/2023-07-rogue-planets-explore.html, “At one time, astronomers believed that the planets formed in their current orbits, which remained stable over time. But more recent observations, theory, and calculations have shown that planetary systems are subject to shake-ups and change. Periodically, planets are kicked out of their star systems to become "rogue planets," bodies that are no longer gravitationally bound to any star and are adrift in the interstellar medium (ISM)…” Ref - Chasing nomadic worlds: A new class of deep space missions, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S009457652300379X?via%3Dihub, 25-July-2023. “Abstract Nomadic worlds, i.e., objects not gravitationally bound to any star(s), are of great interest to planetary science and astrobiology. They have garnered attention recently on account of constraints derived from microlensing surveys and the recent discovery of interstellar planetesimals.”

    IMO, finding habitable exoplanets is becoming more challenging it seems. What astronomy is learning today about exoplanets is very different than Charles Darwin model for abiogenesis taking place in the warm little pond (where no life today would eat the developing non-living matter before it evolves into a cell) published in his 1871 and 1882 letters.
    Reply
  • Helio
    billslugg said:
    A big gamma ray burst might kill all the humans except those deep underground in the gold mines. They would surface to find a landscape of complete death. The cockroaches would be in charge. It would be payback time. They would take all the good tables at the finer restaurants. Humans would have a short lived feast on dead animals but there would be no new food. Seeds would not sprout. They'd be screwed. We'd be dead. We wouldn't care.
    Are you suggesting a grb could have been a real possibility long ago? The Sun likely was part of a cluster of less than 3000 stars, so the IMF favors only a few stars of a massive size. I would guess a life sterilizing grb would be more unlikely than likely. I suspect we could see such a sterilization in ancient rock, especially lunar rocks, but I'm guessing.

    I've forgotten if the pre-Theia impact had the Earth with a thicker atmosphere, this would have helped if such an event took place.
    Reply
  • billslugg
    Yes, I can't quote sources, but there is one of the mass extinctions they can't find evidence of volcanism or iridium from an impactor. GRB was their most probable cause.
    Bad thing about GRB is there is no possible way of warning.

    GRB221009A last October, brightest GRB ever seen. Disrupted radio transmissions. This, from a distance of 1.8 million light years.

    https://www.space.com/gamma-ray-burst-brightest-of-all-time
    In the entire history of high energy gamma ray observing, there were but 100 or 200 examples. This GRB produced 5,000 such photons. It is estimated to be a 1:10,000 years event.
    Reply