Scientists may have just caught 7 exotic 'ghost particles' as they pierced through Earth

A view of a facility with white pillars on either side, attached to a metal structure with stairs. It's in a snowy area; the sky is very blue. An inset shows a diagram of how IceCube works.
(Main) The IceCube neutrino observatory embebbed in ice at the south pole (Inset) a diagram of photons from a neutrino interaction and tau lepton decay detected by digital optical modules (Image credit: Jack Pairin/IceCube Collaboration)

Astronomers using the IceCube observatory, which is buried deep within the ice of the south pole, have detected seven elusive and exotic "ghost particle" candidates as they streamed through Earth. The signals suggest these particles are astrophysical tau neutrinos; they act as important messengers between powerful, high-energy celestial events and us.

Neutrinos are charge-less and nearly mass-less particles that blast through the cosmos at speeds approaching that of light. Oddly enough, because of those parameters, neutrinos barely interact with anything. In fact, around 100 trillion of them pass through our bodies every second. We just can't tell. If you were a human-size neutrino detector, you would have to wait about 100 years for a neutrino to interact with a particle in your body. It is thus for good reason that neutrinos are nicknamed "ghost particles."

High-energy neutrinos from cosmic sources at the edge of the Milky Way are called "astrophysical neutrinos," and they come in three flavors, or generations: Electron neutrinos, muon neutrinos and tau neutrinos. All of these phantom particles are incredibly elusive, as you may expect, but nailing them down is IceCube's mission. In 2013, the observatory made its first detection of astrophysical neutrinos, and now it appears to have detected astrophysical tau neutrinos in particular which could serve as an entirely new type of cosmic messenger.

Related: A nearby supernova could reveal the secret lives of ghostly neutrinos. Here's how.

"The detection of seven candidate tau neutrino events in the data, combined with the very low amount of expected background, allows us to claim that it is highly unlikely that backgrounds are conspiring to produce seven tau neutrino imposters," Doug Cowen, study co-leader and professor of physics at Penn State University said in a statement. "The discovery of astrophysical tau neutrinos also provides a strong confirmation of IceCube’s earlier discovery of the diffuse astrophysical neutrino flux."

IceCube's neutrino detecting Digital Optical Modules before they were buried deep beneath the south pole. (Image credit: Kael Hanson/IceCube/NSF)

Trapped under the ice

To detect neutrinos as they pass through the Earth, IceCube uses strings of golden globes called digital optical modules, or DOMs, embedded in ice. In total, the observatory has 5,160 DOMs buried deep within Antarctic ice, just waiting for neutrinos to interact with molecules in the ice and produce charged particles. These charged particles emit blue light as they journey off through the ice themselves — the DOMs register this light.

More specifically, when high-energy astrophysical tau neutrinos interact with molecules, they create characteristic light emissions, including a distinctive double cascade event that produces two peaks in light levels detected by DOMs.

The double pulse waveform that indicates DOMs have detected tau neutrinos. (Image credit: Jack Pairin/IceCube Collaboration)

In the past, IceCube managed to catch tantalizing hints of those tau-neutrino signatures, but Cowen and colleagues wanted to really pinpoint the elusive particles.

Other neutrino flavors can be detected in "real-time" by IceCube, but the facility currently can't do this for tau neutrinos. Rather, hunting these particular cosmic ghosts requires poring through a decade of archival data. But instead of going full-Scooby-Doo gang and hunting these phantoms themselves, the team trained what are known as "image classification-optimized convolutional neural networks" to sift through almost 10 years of IceCube data collected between 2011 and 2020 to hunt for the tau-neutrino signatures. 

This resulted in seven strong tau neutrino candidate detections.

The team is reserving the possibility that these detections are the product of misidentification, but Cowen explained that the chance of the background detected by DOM mimicking this signal is just 1 in 3.5 million.

The current findings only used three strings of DOM detectors, but future analyses will rely on more of these icy, golden pearls. Not only will this increase the sample of detected tau neutrinos, but it could also help scientists perform the first-ever, three-generation study of neutrino oscillations. This is the phenomenon by which neutrinos switch flavors as they travel over vast cosmological distances.

Understanding neutrino oscillations could be the key to determining how these ghost particles are generated, what events set them hurtling through space in the first place, and the reason behind why they transition to following generations over time.

"All in all, this exciting discovery comes with the intriguing possibility of leveraging tau neutrinos to uncover new physics," Cowen concluded. 

The team's research is featured on the paper repository arXiv and has been accepted for publication in the journal Physical Review Letters.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Robert Lea
Senior Writer

Robert Lea is a science journalist in the U.K. whose articles have been published in Physics World, New Scientist, Astronomy Magazine, All About Space, Newsweek and ZME Science. He also writes about science communication for Elsevier and the European Journal of Physics. Rob holds a bachelor of science degree in physics and astronomy from the U.K.’s Open University. Follow him on Twitter @sciencef1rst.

  • danR
    "Neutrinos are charge-less and nearly mass-less particles that blast through the cosmos at speeds approaching that of light. Oddly enough, because of those parameters, neutrinos barely interact with anything."

    That would be a reason why photons would barely interact with anything. Which they do, and fairly vigorously sometimes.

    Neutrinos are mainly prone to weak-field interactions, which opportunities they rarely stumble on, and to a teeny extent, gravitational fields.
    Reply
  • Torbjorn Larsson
    The 1 in 3.5 million likelihood is a more than 5 sigma detection! So it is indeed confirmation of astrophysical and not only solar (or other sources) neutrinos.

    Speaking of which, the 2024 eROSITA X-ray sky survey cosmology paper has set a tightest limit on total neutrino mass. And disfavor the inverted mass hierarchy at 2 sigma. (This potentially means mass oscillating neutrinos can break the universe matter/antimatter asymmetry by leptogenesis. It is favored by 2 sigma - at normal mass ordering - by the NOvA neutrino experiment.)

    Now if we can only figure out a way to detect the cosmological neutrino background...

    danR said:
    Neutrinos are mainly prone to weak-field interactions, which opportunities they rarely stumble on, and to a teeny extent, gravitational fields.
    Indeed. I have seen a cosmological paper study the 0.2 % by mass neutrino "dark matter" potential component - not quite the remaining massier ("cold") dark matter - to conclude that we can safely ignore it for first order effects. It smears weak lensing observations a bit, but not significantly so.
    Reply
  • Cdr. Shepard
    Torbjorn Larsson said:
    Speaking of which, the 2024 eROSITA X-ray sky survey cosmology paper has set a tightest limit on total neutrino mass. And disfavor the inverted mass hierarchy at 2 sigma. (This potentially means mass oscillating neutrinos can break the universe matter/antimatter asymmetry by leptogenesis. It is favored by 2 sigma - at normal mass ordering - by the NOvA neutrino experiment.)
    Thanks for the observations Torbjorn. Could you explain the bolded portion for me?

    I find particle physics absolutely fascinating but much of it is still ostensibly black magic to me and my lack of study in the field. Please help, o wise one.
    Reply