Skip to main content

The investigation into why a cable mysteriously broke on the Arecibo Observatory has begun

A satellite image taken by one of Planet's SkySat satellites shows the damaged radio dish at the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico. The image was captured at 10:50 a.m. EDT (1450 GMT) on Aug. 10, 2020, about eight hours after a support cable broke and smashed into the dish. (Image credit: Planet Labs, Inc.)

Officials at the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico still don't know what caused a cable failure that severely damaged the facility's iconic radio telescope this week, forcing it to shut down temporarily. 

On Monday (Aug. 10), an auxiliary cable supporting a platform that is suspended above the 1,000-foot-wide (300 meters) radio dish broke and crashed into the telescope's reflector panels, creating a gash in the dish measuring about 100 feet (30 m) long. 

In a news conference with reporters Friday (Aug. 14), Arecibo director Francisco Cordova said that 250 of the observatory's primary reflector dish panels were damaged, along with several support cables underneath the dish. But observatory officials have not yet fully assessed the extent of the damage or determined the cost of the repairs needed to get the 56-year-old radio telescope — once the largest single radio dish on Earth — back in action.

Related: The Arecibo Observatory: A giant radio telescope in photos

The Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico suffered serious damage to its giant radio telescope dish when a support cable broke on Aug. 10, 2020. (Image credit: University of Central Florida)

Cordova said that the auxiliary cable was designed to last at least another 15 to 20 years, so it's not clear why the cable failed. It was one of several auxiliary cables that were added to the observatory in the 1990s to help support a new addition to the telescope, called the Gregorian dome, which houses an antenna  receiver on the platform. 

In a statement issued Monday, UCF officials said that about six to eight panels on the Gregorian dome had been damaged by the broken cable, and that the platform used to access the dome was left slightly twisted. But it's not yet clear if the instruments inside the dome had been affected, Cordova said, adding that officials were still inspecting the damages. 

Before observatory workers begin replacing the panels on the radio dish, their first priority will be to ensure the structural stability of the platform and to keep the staff safe, Cordova said.

A photo of the support cable that broke on Aug. 10, 2020. (Image credit: University of Central Florida)

No one was injured when the accident happened at approximately 2:45 a.m. EDT (0645 GMT) on Monday, as the facility was closed at the time. But if the cable had snapped during the daytime, with staff working on site, Arecibo employees could have been injured, Ramon Lugo, director of the Florida Space Institute at the University of Central Florida (UCF), told Science Magazine. UCF manages the observatory for the National Science Foundation.

The Arecibo Observatory has been shut down indefinitely until the telescope can be repaired. While the observatory is best known for its work in the search for life and potentially hazardous near-Earth asteroids, astronomers use it for a variety of space research and observations. Some of the work that has been put on hold until the telescope is fixed include studies of gravitational waves and pulsars, Cordova said. 

Related: Arecibo Observatory weathers Tropical Storm Isaias to track potentially dangerous asteroid

While the extent of the damage is not yet clear, Cordova said he is confident that Arecibo will bounce back — as it has done several times before. In January of this year a major earthquake shut down Arecibo, and it survived significant damages from Hurricane Maria in 2017.

"The observatory has had a lot of opportunities over the years, and this is just another bump in the road," Cordova said. "We are a pretty resilient bunch."

Email Hanneke Weitering at hweitering@space.com or follow her @hannekescience. Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

  • HPoirot
    Thanks for providing that decent photo of the broken rope. I'd like to see both ends. I'm not highly trained in failures, but the visible end looks to have been heated sufficiently at that location - eg during construction - such that the zinc from the galvanizing process (performed before the rope is 'wound') fused most strands together. With the loss of flexibility at that point, it could have been a brittle-fracture waiting to happen all these years. The few loose strands were probably all that were left to hold the load once the main fused chunk fractured, and they likely broke almost immediately under the sudden load-change.
    Reply
  • Moon Doggy
    When I saw the condition the great telescope was in I was shocked and saddened that the people there have been neglecting it for years, even way before this alleged mishap I caught a recent photo of it a year ago and it was crumbling and half of the base white color was gone and over growth of bushes were coming through, on space shows for years look great, but it was looking like it should have been condemned, you'd never see that in the US, I say instead of giving them the money to fix (possible motive) move it to the US!
    Reply
  • Termoon
    Moon Doggy said:
    When I saw the condition the great telescope was in I was shocked and saddened that the people there have been neglecting it for years, even way before this alleged mishap I caught a recent photo of it a year ago and it was crumbling and half of the base white color was gone and over growth of bushes were coming through, on space shows for years look great, but it was looking like it should have been condemned, you'd never see that in the US, I say instead of giving them the money to fix (possible motive) move it to the US!

    Puerto Rico is part of the U.S.
    Reply