The gravitational wave background of the universe has been heard for the 1st time

Astronomers have heard the faint hum of gravitational waves echoing throughout the universe for the first time.

For nearly a decade, scientists have been hunting for the gravitational wave background, a faint but persistent echo of gravitational waves thought to have been set off by events that took place soon after the Big Bang and the mergers of supermassive black holes throughout the cosmos. While such a background was long theorized by physicists and sought by astronomers, signals of gravitational waves that make up that background have been hard to detect due to being faint, in addition to vibrating at decade-long timescales. Now, long-term observations have finally confirmed their presence.

In a highly anticipated and globally coordinated announcement on Wednesday (June 28), teams of scientists worldwide have reported the discovery of the "low pitch hum" of these cosmic ripples flowing through the Milky Way.

While astronomers don't definitively know what's causing the hum, the detected signal is "compelling evidence" and consistent with theoretical expectations of gravitational waves emerging from copious pairs of "the most massive black holes in the entire universe" weighing as much as billions of suns, said Stephen Taylor, a gravitational wave astrophysicist at Vanderbilt University in Tennessee who co-led the research.

Related: What are gravitational waves?

Artist's interpretation of an array of pulsars being affected by gravitational ripples produced by a supermassive black hole binary in a distant galaxy. (Image credit: Aurore Simonnet for the NANOGrav Collaboration)

Hints of the same signal were announced in a series of papers published by scientists in China, India, Europe and Australia. They say the signals may be coming from merging supermassive black holes that are caught in cosmic dances, circling each other in orbits that shrink across millions of years. During this process, they release energy in the form of gravitational waves that reverberate throughout the universe   —  waves astronomers now say they have detected. 

Scientists report that the observed background hum of gravitational waves has grown in significance over time, providing tantalizing proof that there may be hundreds of thousands or even millions of supermassive black holes about to merge in the next few hundred thousand years, even though the gargantuan objects themselves haven't yet been spotted.

Cosmic lighthouses as gravitational wave detectors 

To detect the gravitational wave background, astronomers studied fast-spinning stars called millisecond pulsars, which are dead stars that spin up to 700 times per second with astonishing regularity, blasting out beams of light from their magnetic poles, which are seen as "pulses" when they flicker in Earth's direction.

Such cosmic lighthouses can help spot gravitational waves from black holes that are supermassive, millions to billions times larger than our sun. In comparison, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) network can only detect gravitational waves originating from smaller black holes that are up to 10 times as massive as the sun.

If the yawning stretch of space between Earth and the pulsars were absolutely empty, then light from the flashing cosmic clocks would take the same time to reach Earth every time they pulse in our direction. In actuality, the timing of the pulses is influenced by factors such as the gas and dust in the interstellar medium and motions of pulsars as well as Earth in the Milky Way. 

Gravitational waves, too, stretch and compress the space-time fabric between us and the pulsars, distorting their otherwise meticulously regular pulses from anywhere between tens of nanoseconds to five or more years, resulting in the light flashes arriving earlier or later than normal.

In the new research, the "critical evidence" that betrays the source of the signals to be supermassive black holes is a unique pattern found in the arrival times of pulses from a galaxy-sized cosmic antenna of nearly 70 millisecond pulsars in the Milky Way, according to a consortium of astronomers known as The North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav). Gravitational wave signals from black hole binaries overlap "like voices in a crowd" and result in an incessant hum that embeds as a unique pattern in the pulsar timing data, scientists say.

Scientists extracted that pattern by observing lighthouse-like beams from pairs of pulsars. Using various radio telescopes like the now-collapsed Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico, the Green Bank Observatory in West Virginia, the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array in New Mexico and the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME) in Canada, they collected data about the timing of those pulses every month for 15 years. Then, they calculated the difference between the pulses' actual arrival times and their predicted arrival times — which they could estimate within 1 microsecond, comparable to measuring the distance to the moon to within a thousandth of a millimeter, scientists say.

The much sought-after gravitational wave signals were embedded in those differences, Taylor said. This is the first time that scientists have found compelling evidence for such patterns of inconsistency etched by a backdrop of gravitational waves, whose effects on pulsars' light flashes were predicted by Einstein's theory of general relativity back in 1916.

"We are extraordinarily excited to see this pattern pop out finally," said Taylor.

An illustration of positions of Milky Way's pulsars included in NANOGrav's 15-year dataset. Blue stars indicate pulsars, while the central yellow star represents Earth's position.   (Image credit: NANOGrav)

Crossing the final threshold

Scientists know that when black holes merge, their gravity interacts with nearby stars, which drains the black holes' orbital energies and nudges them increasingly closer to the point of becoming a single black hole. A simple model suggests that after black holes get within 3.2 light-years of one another other, they merge by radiating gravitational waves. However, other models have suggested that black holes span timescales longer than the universe itself in that they stall their merger when they reach that 3.2 light-years mark.

"At one point, scientists were concerned that supermassive black holes in binaries would orbit each other forever, never coming close enough together to generate a signal like this," Luke Zoltan Kelley, who is an assistant professor at the University of California, Berkeley and part of the NANOGrav collaboration, said in a statement.

So how those black holes reduce their orbit beyond that distance and eventually merge — known as the "final parsec problem" — has not been very well understood.

"To get these types of high amplitudes that we are seeing, we need fairly massive black holes, and they need to form binaries quite frequently and evolve quite efficiently," said Kelley.

If the discovery pans out and the signals being detected do end up being from binary black holes, "then they absolutely had to have passed the final parsec one way or another," he added.

Four separate studies on the discovery of the gravitational wave background have been published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters:

The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background
The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Observations and Timing of 68 Millisecond Pulsars
The NANOGrav 15-Year Data Set: Detector Characterization and Noise Budget
The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics

Two additional studies have been accepted by The Astrophysical Journal Letters for publication at a later date.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Sharmila Kuthunur
Space.com contributor

Sharmila Kuthunur is a Seattle-based science journalist covering astronomy, astrophysics and space exploration. Follow her on X @skuthunur.

  • rod
    The space.com report states: "In the new research, the "critical evidence" that betrays the source of the signals to be supermassive black holes is a unique pattern found in the arrival times of pulses from a galaxy-sized cosmic antenna of nearly 70 millisecond pulsars in the Milky Way, according to a consortium of astronomers known as The North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav). Gravitational wave signals from black hole binaries overlap "like voices in a crowd" and result in an incessant hum that embeds as a unique pattern in the pulsar timing data, scientists say."

    My observation. What? Just yesterday a report on SMBH, and comments show SMBH in BBT could be a real problem for the cosmology. Supermassive black holes grow surprisingly quickly, study suggests, https://forums.space.com/threads/supermassive-black-holes-grow-surprisingly-quickly-study-suggests.62025/
    Reply
  • Atlan0001
    rod said:
    The space.com report states: "In the new research, the "critical evidence" that betrays the source of the signals to be supermassive black holes is a unique pattern found in the arrival times of pulses from a galaxy-sized cosmic antenna of nearly 70 millisecond pulsars in the Milky Way, according to a consortium of astronomers known as The North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav). Gravitational wave signals from black hole binaries overlap "like voices in a crowd" and result in an incessant hum that embeds as a unique pattern in the pulsar timing data, scientists say."

    My observation. What? Just yesterday a report on SMBH, and comments show SMBH in BBT could be a real problem for the cosmology. Supermassive black holes grow surprisingly quickly, study suggests, https://forums.space.com/threads/supermassive-black-holes-grow-surprisingly-quickly-study-suggests.62025/
    I've got something I'm about to deal in elsewhere, Rod, that might be an interesting take on things, That is, if I can present the picture of modeling I've already done, properly?!
    Reply
  • rod
    It seems JWST is finding all types of interesting cosmology stuff, that could be problems for BBT :) Here is another new report discussing SMBH in the early universe.

    Webb identifies the earliest strands of the cosmic web, https://phys.org/news/2023-06-webb-earliest-strands-cosmic-web.html
    My notes. The rapid formation of SMBH in the early universe in BB cosmology is very difficult to explain. From the phys.org report, "To form these supermassive black holes in such a short time, two criteria must be satisfied. First, you need to start growing from a massive 'seed' black hole. Second, even if this seed starts with a mass equivalent to a thousand Suns, it still needs to accrete a million times more matter at the maximum possible rate for its entire lifetime," explained Wang. "These unprecedented observations are providing important clues about how black holes are assembled.”

    My note, it is apparent that SMBH so early in BB cosmology is an issue. The gas seen in the quasar with redshift 6.61 still contains metals, not metal free or pristine gas created by BBN, when CMBR appears as light, cosmic dark ages, or the gas said to evolve into Population III stars. Some of these reports on SMBHs suggest Population III stars 10,000 to 100,000 solar masses could be seeds for their origin, other models suggest *massive dark matter halos*.

    ref - A SPectroscopic Survey of Biased Halos in the Reionization Era (ASPIRE): JWST Reveals a Filamentary Structure around a z = 6.61 Quasar, https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/accd6f, 29-June-2023. “1. Introduction Quasars, powered by accreting supermassive black holes (SMBHs) with masses of 10^8–10^10 M⊙, have been observed up to z = 7.6 (Bañados et al. 2018; Yang et al. 2020a; Wang et al. 2021), deep into the epoch of reionization (EoR). How these quasars formed within the first billion years after the Big Bang is one of the most important open questions in astrophysics. Cosmological simulations suggest that billion-solar-mass SMBHs in the EoR formed in massive dark matter halos (e.g., Di Matteo et al. 2005; Springel et al. 2005) and grew through cold flow accretion (e.g., Di Matteo et al. 2012) and/or merging with other gas-rich halos (e.g., Li et al. 2007)." "5. Summary In this work, we provide a brief overview of the JWST ASPIRE program, which will perform a legacy galaxy redshift survey in the fields of 25 reionization-era quasars using NIRCam/WFSS. From the early JWST observation of the field around the quasar J0305–3150, we discovered a filamentary structure traced by the quasar and 10 emitters at z = 6.6. …We also found that the most massive SMBHs in cosmological simulations generally trace galaxy overdensities but with a large variance on the galaxy numbers. This suggests that deep observations of a large sample of quasars (e.g., the ASPIRE program) would be essential for a comprehensive understanding of the cosmic environment of the earliest SMBHs."
    Reply
  • billslugg
    It seems dark matter played a bigger role than thought in the formation of SMBHs. They'll get this sorted out some day.
    Reply
  • rod
    billslugg said:
    It seems dark matter played a bigger role than thought in the formation of SMBHs. They'll get this sorted out some day.
    The check is in the mail :)
    Reply
  • corey555
    The 3 million light-year-long structure is anchored by a luminous quasar—a galaxy with an active, supermassive black hole at its core. The team believes the filament will eventually evolve into a massive cluster of galaxies, much like the well-known Coma Cluster in the nearby universe.
    Reply
  • PabloMB
    Hi
    "To get these types of high amplitudes that we are seeing, we need fairly massive black holes, and they need to form binaries quite frequently and evolve quite efficiently," said Kelley.
    OK we are seeing changes in the pulsar's frequencies, but if the cosmic antenna is really galaxy-sized, then the SMBH should be orbiting the Milky Way, and I think it would take its time and we should have noticed it. We are talking of huge SMBH but they must be swift and fast, it makes me dubt of this possibility.
    May it be that the reason would be another than SMBHs moving? Perhaps black matter?
    Thanks. Regards
    Reply