Star Formation Reveals Strange Evolution of Early Galaxies

Blue Stars in Omega Centauri
The tiny blue stars shown in the globular cluster of Omega Centauri can't be seen in distant galaxies, but new findings show they dominate in early ellipticals. (Image credit: NASA/ESA/Anderson/van der Marel)

A formula that astronomers have long used to determine how much mass galaxies had at their birth may not be as dependable as scientists once thought, a new study suggests.

The study, which took a close look at 260 early galaxies, found that the distribution of stars in early galaxies is actually different from galaxies that formed at a later time in the universe — a finding that could change our understanding of how galaxies evolve.

At the center of the perplexing star story is an astronomical formula known as the initial mass function, or IMF. The formula helps astronomers determine the mass of stars within a galaxy, which can then be used to measure the galaxy's growth over time.

The group calculated the mass of the stars in the survey by studying the energy they radiate. They compared that number with the mass obtained by measuring the motion of the stars, which is controlled by the galaxy's gravitational pull. [Photos: When Galaxies Collide]

"We found that these two methods do not agree," study co-author Michele Cappellari, of the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom, told SPACE.com by email.

"Small stars are numerous, and so provide a lot of mass, but little light," Cappellari said.

"The IMF is necessary to convert the light we observe from galaxies into the stellar mass that all models predict," Cappellari said. "Up to now, astrophysicists assumed this conversion could be performed with a universal IMF."

"Current models use the wrong galaxy stellar masses in the comparison, and will have to be revised," Cappellari said.

Star formation — and galaxy evolution — involves a number of complex factors, ranging from hydrodynamics to the effect of radiation and the chemistry of nuclear reactions. Its complexity makes it difficult to model. According to Cappellari, this is "computationally infeasible."

"It may take years before astrophysicists converge on an explanation," she said.

"What seems clear … is that the oldest galaxies in the universe formed their stars in much more dramatic and intense events, while spiral galaxies formed stars more quietly for the major part of their lives."

Follow SPACE.com for the latest in space science and exploration news on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Nola Taylor Tillman
Contributing Writer

Nola Taylor Tillman is a contributing writer for Space.com. She loves all things space and astronomy-related, and always wants to learn more. She has a Bachelor's degree in English and Astrophysics from Agnes Scott College and served as an intern at Sky & Telescope magazine. She loves to speak to groups on astronomy-related subjects. She lives with her husband in Atlanta, Georgia. Follow her on Bluesky at @astrowriter.social.bluesky