Partner Series
Lunar Origin Story Could Support Wet-Moon Findings
A video simulation of the prevailing moon-formation model, in which the proto-Earth was hit by a Mars-size object between 4.4 billion and 4.5 billion years ago.
Credit: Miki Nakajima/Dave Stevenson

If Earth retained water after its fiery birth, could the moon have done so, too?

Evidence suggests water may exist below the moon's surface. And to figure out if current ideas about the lunar formation process support the possibility of a watery moon, scientists modeled the moments when Earth and the moon were forming from the same material.

The OSIRIS-REx spacecraft photographed Earth and the moon on Jan. 17, and both appear to almost merge into a singular point against the dark expanse of space. And for a moment, billions of years ago, the planet and the moon were one.

The prevailing theory behind the birth of the moon holds that Theia, a Mars-size hunk of rock, smashed into young Earth between 4.4 billion and 4.5 billion years ago, and was powerful enough to heat up and vaporize material, sending some of it flying off into space. This formed a disk of matter, and the moon formed as these pieces came together, cooled down and coalesced, according to the theory. [5 Wild Theories on How the Moon Formed]

This event is the subject of a recent study, conducted by Miki Nakajima, of the Carnegie Institute for Science, and Dave Stevenson, of the California Institute of Technology. They wanted to know if the lunar origin story, as commonly understood by astronomers, supports recent findings that water might exist on the moon. Specifically, they looked at the range of temperatures possible during the proto-moon stage.

If the disk of material that formed the moon was very hot, then hydrogen and other elements with low boiling points would have jetted off into space, the study's researchers said in a statement. And if there's no hydrogen, there's no water. But if the disk was cool enough, then hydrogen wouldn't have vaporized off into space, and instead would have remained on the lunar building blocks.

"The good news is that our models show that observations of a wet moon are not incompatible with a giant impact origin," Nakajima said in the statement.

"This is still very much an area of active research … figuring out about how much water exists in the Moon," Nakajima added. "This is a highly important and challenging question to answer given that we have limited knowledge on the history and distribution of lunar water." Theories of lunar formation now need to account for the higher estimates of lunar water found in mission samples, and though there's more work to be done, this research is an important step in understanding how the moon came to be.

The new work was detailed in the journal Earth and Planetary Science Letters.

Follow Doris Elin Salazar on Twitter@salazar_elin. Follow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook and Google+. Original article on Space.com.