What We Need to Know Before Landing Astronauts on Mars
SpaceX Dragon makes use of Supersonic Retro-Propulsion (SRP) to land on Mars.
Credit: SpaceX

Elon Musk and his SpaceX rocketeers are blueprinting a plan to land humans on Mars in 2025 and to land payloads onto the Red Planet's surface at each 26 month opportunity starting in 2018. A similar timeline may be pursued by other players.

That as a given, a specially convened "ePanel" of Mars experts recently tackled a specific question:

"If humans do land on Mars in 2025 what do we absolutely need to know from the surface of Mars before that time and specifically what measurements and demonstrations need to be done with the 2018 and later precursor landers to make that possible?" [SpaceX's Red Dragon Mars Mission in Images]

SpaceX Red Dragon on Mars.
SpaceX Red Dragon on Mars.
Credit: SpaceX

The report, now in draft form, is called "Essential Precursor Activities for a Near-Term Human Mars Mission." It is the output from an independent virtual panel of researchers sponsored by Ceres Robotics of Montara, California.

The exercise had neither encouragement nor approval from SpaceX nor NASA. The initiative was led by Michael Sims, leader of Ceres Robotics and a Mars Exploration Rover co-investigator.

In its pages, the draft report underscores the fact that there are a number of "clear and pressing issues that need to be addressed as soon as possible."

The ePanelists for this inquiry were:

Christopher McKay (NASA Ames); Carol Stoker (NASA Ames); Margaret Race (SETI Institute); Andrew Schuerger (University of Florida); Penelope Boston (NASA Astrobiology Institute); Pascal Lee (NASA Ames; SETI Institute; Mars Institute); Charles Cockell (University of Edinburgh); and Michael Sims (moderator) from Ceres Robotics; Mars Institute.

"There is a great deal that needs to be tested and evaluated on the Mars surface on very tight timelines to be properly prepared for a near-term Mars mission. Clearly a mission within a decade can be considered near-term although even a considerably later mission will require expedience and a focused effort," the report notes.

In the view of the ePanel experts, primary concerns are:

  • Crew safety
  • Dangers to crew from exposure to surface materials and toxic chemistry
  • Dangers to crew from possible pathogens
  • Contamination of the Martian surface by crew-transported organisms from Earth
  • Danger to Earth from return of (unlikely but possible) pathogens that are damaging to Earth's biological balance
  • Availability of resources useful for human activities including life sustaining materials.

In terms of the search for life on the Red Planet, the report explains that it will not be possible to fully demonstrate the absence of life on all of Mars in any near-term basis "unless we find overwhelming evidence of its existence."

Furthermore, scouring the planet widely in this search is likely to be a slow process, the report adds. "This is probably the highest scientific goal for Mars exploration in the long term and it is reasonable for this science exploration be concurrently with the expansion of human presence on Mars. However, unlike the Moon, Mars does theoretically have many possible niches for life and hence as we continue the exploration of Mars we must also continue the search for extant Mars life far into the future."

  • Space.com
  • Yes - The Red Planet is teeming with tiny microbes, we just haven't found them yet.
  • Yes - An advanced civilization lives below the surface, where we can't detect them.
  • No - Life never existed on Mars.
  • No - Mars once had life, but those organisms are long dead.
As identified in the report, the ePanel experts made a number of suggestions, an "initial gauntlet" of views for further in-depth discussion. These are:

  • If possible, land all future precursor missions to the single site of human landing. In addition to the value to future explorers of landed resources at this site, this also gives the best chance of evaluation of the local toxicities and a search for any extant Mars organisms at that site.
  • There are no tricorders for life – even on Earth, but especially for life that might have a distinct genesis. We need to exercise a number of different instruments on the Mars surface to look for indications of extant life at the landing site. Those instruments need to be applied at a number of areas (niches) around any landing site. Confidence will grow in our outcome as the number of tests and sites increase.
  • Although after 40 years we now believe we understand the Viking life on Mars experiment results, we need to be prepared for future surprises and uncertainties to come with our experiments. This leads to a preferred strategy to treat these life-detection instruments as an ongoing development (across precursor and human missions) of more refined instrumentation in search of indicators of extant life.
  • Until we understand the extent of extant life on Mars (if it exists at all) then one reasonable approach is to exercising a zoned approach to planetary protection.
  • We need to characterize the chemistry and especially toxicity of the surface and near subsurface materials at the landing site. We also need to demonstrate techniques for mitigation of those toxicities that are compatible with human crew use and safety.
  • Resource needs for the crew and minimizing the burden of keeping a crew safe are parameters to be evaluated in the base site selection. If the case can be closed on pumping water and oxygen and other trace gases out of the atmosphere then that approach has the advantage of ease of crewed operations and relative location independence of the base landing site.

Leonard David is author of "Mars: Our Future on the Red Planet," to be published by National Geographic this October. The book is a companion to the National Geographic Channel six-part series coming in November. A longtime writer for Space.com, David has been reporting on the space industry for more than five decades. Follow us @SpacedotcomFacebook or Google+. Story published on Space.com.