Antarctic sea ice hits record low, satellites reveal

The seasonal variations in the amount of sea ice around Antarctica.
The growth and decrease in the amount of sea ice surrounding Antarctica throughout the year. (Image credit: NASA)

Antarctic sea ice shrunk to a record low in February this year. Satellite measurements revealed that only 66% of the sea ice extent usually detected during the peak of the southern summer has been present in the waters surrounding the South Pole last month. 

The previous monthly record low was reported in 2017 out of a series of measurements that dates back to 1979, the European environment-monitoring agency Copernicus said in an emailed statement. 

The agency's Sentinel satellites found below-average sea ice concentrations in all regions of the Southern Ocean, the southernmost part of the global ocean that surrounds Antarctica. 

"Our latest data show that Antarctic sea ice reached its lowest extent in the 45-year satellite data record," Samantha Burgess, the Deputy Director of the Copernicus Climate Change Service, said in the statement. "These low sea ice conditions may have important implications for the stability of Antarctic ice shelves and ultimately for global sea level rise. Polar ice caps are a sensitive indicator of the climate crisis and it is important to closely monitor the changes occurring there."

Related: Doomsday Glacier melting in Antarctica means terrible news for global sea level rise

According to an earlier announcement by the U.S. National Snow & Ice Data Center, the amount of ice floating in the Antarctic seas dropped to 737,000 square miles (1.91 million square kilometers) on Feb. 13 this year, breaking a previous record for a lowest daily value reported on Feb. 25, 2022. At that time, however, the lowest extent was reached closer to the end of the melting season. 

"In past years, the annual minimum has occurred between February 18 and March 3, so further decline is expected," the U.S. National Snow & Ice Data Center said in the statement issued on Feb. 14. 

The amount of sea ice around Antarctica is usually at its highest in September when it peaks at about 7 million square miles (18 million square kilometers). The annual lows, usually reported in February, tend to hover at around the 772,200 square-mile (2 million square km) mark, according to The Guardian. This year, however, the amount of Antarctic sea ice dropped as low as 691,122 square miles (1.79 million square km) on Feb. 25, the Guardian reported. 

Antarctica, traditionally more resilient to the effects of climate change than its smaller northern counterpart, the Arctic, has experienced strong winds during the southern spring that accelerated the ice loss, according to The Guardian. 

Scientists are sounding alarm bells about the future of Antarctic sea ice, as the whole continent's ice sheets and glaciers hold so much water that they would cause a significant rise in global sea levels if they were to melt. 

The Arctic, which has just passed the peak of this year's winter season, didn't fare well in February either. Satellite data revealed the second lowest February sea ice extent since satellite measurements began. With sea ice extent measuring 4% below the average for the month, the Arctic was only in a slightly better position than in the years 2016 and 2017, which jointly hold the record for the lowest Arctic sea ice extent during the peak winter period. 

February 2023 was the fifth warmest February globally, with most of Europe warmer than usual, Copernicus said. The U.S. East, northern Russia, Pakistan and India also experienced above average temperatures. The U.S. West, northeastern Russia, Turkey and northern Australia, on the other hand, experienced a colder February this year. 

Follow Tereza Pultarova on Twitter @TerezaPultarova. Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Tereza Pultarova
Senior Writer

Tereza is a London-based science and technology journalist, aspiring fiction writer and amateur gymnast. Originally from Prague, the Czech Republic, she spent the first seven years of her career working as a reporter, script-writer and presenter for various TV programmes of the Czech Public Service Television. She later took a career break to pursue further education and added a Master's in Science from the International Space University, France, to her Bachelor's in Journalism and Master's in Cultural Anthropology from Prague's Charles University. She worked as a reporter at the Engineering and Technology magazine, freelanced for a range of publications including Live Science, Space.com, Professional Engineering, Via Satellite and Space News and served as a maternity cover science editor at the European Space Agency.

  • Jack Colter
    45 years out of a total history of 3.5 billion years?
    A rediculously small sample set.
    This means absolutely nothing.
    Stop the hysteria.
    Reply
  • bwana4swahili
    The Antarctic continent has been ice-free many times in the past and will be again in the future. Homo Sapiens will simple adapt or die; nature's law!
    Reply
  • bwana4swahili
    Jack Colter said:
    45 years out of a total history of 3.5 billion years?
    A rediculously small sample set.
    This means absolutely nothing.
    Stop the hysteria.
    But the hysteria is needed to fund more research, sadly!
    Reply
  • JAS
    This is a science-based web-site, and so the article is written to an audience that is knowledgeable enough to know that long-term historic ice levels in the Antarctic and Arctic since the peak of last ice age about 21,000 years ago are known to be much higher than modern levels. No hysteria involved. As to the last 3.5 billion year of geologic history, well, going that far back would be hysterical.....and redundant.
    Reply
  • PWB
    The Antarctic ice sheet has been steadily growing for decades and is very healthy. Each year the temps down there get colder and colder (this year has been record setting). The article only talks of sea ice, which is not the same thing. The currents have been wild around the continent this last year causing that ice to break up and dissipate much faster. Nothing to do with warming climate. Zip...zilch...nada. Please do not mislead. Do your research and start writing balanced news.
    Reply
  • PWB
    P.S., Admin, it's 'Antarctic sea ice shrank'.
    Reply
  • JAS
    The whole issue of antarctic ice levels and its relationship to Climate Change and global sea levels is really quite complex and beyond the expertise of arm-chair experts, including myself. You're an arm-chair expert if you hold strong opinions on the subject but don't have extensive experience as a antarctic climate scientist. Typically, I find the stronger the opinions of the arm-chair expert, the weaker the qualifications. To get at least a flavour for what's involved at a high level, here is a good article from NASA's website that highlights at least a few of the interrelated issues. The experts readily agree that there's more out there than is currently known, and so aren't quite as opinionated as the arm-chair crowd.
    https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses
    Reply
  • PWB
    Hello JAS. Yes, I couldn't agree with you more that I am indeed an 'arm-chair' expert and that the interactions are complex, to say the least. And I do appreciate the link to the NASA article. I do my best to educate myself from many sources. The main point in my post was to highlight the article's inferred bias toward AGW by highlighting the sea-ice dissipation without acknowledging the fact that the land-ice accumulations have steadily grown. If that point had at least been mentioned, then the question would have been, why one but not the other? Thanks again.
    Reply
  • JAS
    Hi PWB, thanks for your thoughtful response. As I reflect from my 'arm-chair' on the concern you've expressed, I wonder if the bias you detect might be related to the way in which science journalism operates. As I understand it, journalists see some new study coming out, and write up a popularized description for general consumption by the typical reader of, in this case, Space.com. It's not often that each descriptive article includes a general overview of the 'state of the science' surrounding the whole subject matter, which would eliminate perceived bias, but which might create too large an article, or too difficult a task for the journalist who has to balance their time against what they're paid for that submission. This phenomenon would be more likely the more complex or wide-ranging the topic was. For example, Antarctic ice levels are often considered a bell-weather to various issues associated with climate change, even though the relationships are not straight-forward (eg warming trends elsewhere generating more snow pack and so more ice, not less as one would expect during global warming, as noted in the NASA article). A thorough synthesis of the whole issue of global warming and Antarctic ice, both on land and over water would be quite a task for our modestly-paid science journalists. Thoughts?
    Reply