Partner Series
'Totally Wrong' on Jupiter: What Scientists Gleaned from NASA's Juno Mission
Cyclones swirl at Jupiter's south pole in this photo from NASA's Juno spacecraft.
Credit: Betsy Asher Hall/Gervasio Robles/NASA/JPL-Caltech/SwRI/MSSS

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. — Before NASA sent its Juno spacecraft to explore Jupiter, astronomers were "totally wrong" about much of what they thought they knew about the planet, the mission's principal investigator, Scott Bolton, said during a lecture here at the 231st meeting of the American Astronomical Society on Tuesday (Jan. 9). 

Juno, which launched in 2011 and is currently orbiting Jupiter, is not the first spacecraft to study the gas giant up close. NASA's Pioneer and Voyager missions flew by Jupiter in the 1970s, and the Galileo spacecraft later spent eight years orbiting the planet. Even before that, humans had been studying Jupiter with telescopes for hundreds of years. 

By the time Juno launched, astronomers had a pretty good idea of what to expect from the new images and data it would collect at Jupiter — or so they thought. [Photos: NASA's Juno Mission to Jupiter]

"Our ideas were totally wrong about the interior structure, about the atmosphere, [and] even about the magnetosphere," Bolton said. Astronomers believed that Jupiter had either a very small and dense core, or perhaps no core at all. But data from Juno revealed that Jupiter has an enormous, "fuzzy" core that might be partially dissolved. This discrepancy between scientists' expectations and the data suggests that there's a lot we still don't know about giant gas planets, he explained. 

During its first few close encounters with Jupiter, the spacecraft revealed strange clusters of cyclones raging around Jupiter's north and south poles. Juno is the first space mission to get a good look at the poles, and the mission's scientists did not expect them to look as weird and chaotic as they do, Bolton said. "Had someone shown me a picture of just the pole 10 years ago, I never would have guessed it was Jupiter." 

Measurements of Jupiter's magnetic field yielded more surprises. Astronomers knew that Jupiter has the strongest magnetic field of all the planets in the solar system, but Juno found that the magnetic field is actually twice as strong as was previously thought. Much like Earth's magnetic field, Jupiter's magnetic field funnels charged particles (mostly electrons) toward the planet's magnetic poles, where the particles interact with atoms in the atmosphere to create bright auroras. 

Strangely, auroras on Jupiter seem to be powered by a mysterious physical force that astronomers haven't been able to identify. According to the mathematical calculations, Jupiter's auroras should be about 10 to 30 times more energetic than Earth's, but Juno has seen auroras that are hundreds of times stronger for no apparent reason. And to make things even weirder, Jupiter's auroras seem to turn off at night as the poles rotate into the dark. This means that Jupiter's northern and southern lights behave differently at each pole, unlike the auroras on Earth. 

While scientists and astronomers have been scratching their heads over all these new groundbreaking discoveries enabled by the Juno spacecraft, the photographs Juno has taken of Jupiter have been similarly mind-boggling, Bolton said. Juno's raw images, taken by the spacecraft's JunoCam, are available online for citizen-scientists to download and process, and people have helped to create the most amazing images of Jupiter the world has ever seen. "I'm not sure that anybody on my team was ready for Jupiter to look like that," Bolton said. "We were just startled."

As Juno continues its mission exploring Jupiter and its moons, mission scientists will be looking for new explanations for the strange new things they have learned about Jupiter. And just as the mission will attempt to shed light on these unsolved mysteries, it may very well uncover more ways in which astronomers have been wrong about Jupiter. Bolton ended his lecture with a message to grad students: "Keep working on the theories. Don't believe your professors." 

Email Hanneke Weitering at hweitering@space.com or follow her @hannekescience. Follow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook and Google+. Original article on Space.com.