SpaceX Starship docking system readies for moon missions in tests with NASA
Starship met up with Orion during more than 200 tests.
Practice makes perfect, which is especially true for moon missions with astronauts on board.
That's why SpaceX and NASA recently completed more than 200 docking scenarios together with Starship hardware. Starship is the landing system that will bring astronauts to the lunar surface with the Artemis 3 mission, no earlier than 2026.
Engineers at NASA's Johnson Space Center spent 10 days using hardware from the Starship lander and NASA's Orion orbiter (designed by Lockheed Martin) at "various approach angles and speeds," NASA officials said in a release. "These real-world results, using full-scale hardware, will validate computer models of the moon lander's docking system," agency officials wrote on Wednesday (Feb. 28).
Related: NASA astronauts test SpaceX Starship elevator for future moon landings
The Artemis 3 moon landing requires two spacecraft: the Orion capsule, which will ferry the astronauts to lunar orbit, and the Starship lander, which will send the astronauts to the moon's south pole. The agency eventually aims to create a permanent settlement in this region to take advantage of its potential water ice, which would be beneficial for fueling and other mission needs.
The testing put Starship into the active docking role, with its hardware being a "chaser" to the Orion target docking system, NASA officials explained. Testing was meant to ensure SpaceX's soft capture system could extend to Orion, while Orion's passive system stayed retracted. The two hardware pieces join through "latches and other mechanisms," according to the agency.
While Starship has not yet made it to Earth orbit, its lunar docking system has a lot of flight heritage: it's based on the Dragon 2 docking system used for International Space Station missions. On future missions following Artemis 3, Starship will dock, alongside Orion, with NASA's Gateway space station for astronaut transfer.
Get the Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
SpaceX was initially chosen as the winner in 2021 of the Human Landing System (HLS) contract for the NASA-led Artemis program, which intends to bring a coalition of nations to the moon's surface under the Artemis Accords. NASA at first said it was planning on selecting multiple vendors, making the sole-source award a surprise.
Blue Origin and Dynetics, other companies competing for the opportunity, filed protests to the Government Accountability Office and cited "flawed acquisition" for the program as well as "issues and concerns" with the award process. The GAO turned those protests down and, in its detailed rationale released that August, said it found no "competitive prejudice" in NASA's decision. The U.S. Senate, however, directed NASA to select a second company in October 2021, and the agency eventually went with Blue Origin for its Blue Moon lander system.
Starship made two test flights in 2023 in an attempt to reach Earth orbit, but neither were successful. The most recent SpaceX-led investigation into the November launch attempt was closed by the Federal Aviation Administration this week, and SpaceX is now working on the launch license for its third attempt.
The Artemis 3 landing, along with the Artemis 2 round-the-moon mission which will have astronauts onboard as well, was delayed in January due to several technical issues that included Starship delays. Artemis 3 will now land in 2026 at the earliest, a year later than planned, while Artemis 2 is launching nine months later in September 2025.
SpaceX's progress with Starship has been a concern for NASA for quite a while. NASA associate administrator Jim Free said in June 2023, for example, that SpaceX will need to finish "a significant number of launches" successfully before the agency gives the green light for Artemis.
In its Tuesday update, NASA officials noted SpaceX has finished "more than 30 HLS specific milestones" regarding hardware ranging from generating power and developing a guidance and navigation system, to mechanisms for propulsion, life support and protection from space's harsh environment.
Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.
Elizabeth Howell (she/her), Ph.D., was a staff writer in the spaceflight channel between 2022 and 2024 specializing in Canadian space news. She was contributing writer for Space.com for 10 years from 2012 to 2024. Elizabeth's reporting includes multiple exclusives with the White House, leading world coverage about a lost-and-found space tomato on the International Space Station, witnessing five human spaceflight launches on two continents, flying parabolic, working inside a spacesuit, and participating in a simulated Mars mission. Her latest book, "Why Am I Taller?" (ECW Press, 2022) is co-written with astronaut Dave Williams.
-
CommonSenseNow Being they haven't figured out how to launch one without blowing it the hell up....I would say that, as usual, the fanboy hack blogger wannabe is jumping the gun.Reply -
Mergatroid This is awesome. I can't wait to see this system in operation.Reply
Being the largest rocket ever produced by humanity, and the fact it's using all newly designed engines and fuel systems, it's no surprise they are having some issues getting it all working.
Musk seems dedicated to this (good for him) however, and I fully expect to see it working in the next 1 to 2 years.
Once is is working, all the naysayers can eat crow. -
Atlan0001 What I want to see beginning for the space frontier is the tooling to make tools, progressively to make tools, ever more of them ever widening. A construction facility to make construction facilities, progressively to make construction facilities, ever more of them ever widening. And a mining base on the Moon. What is not even on drawing boards yet after fifty-one years that I know of. Every thing is still square one, has not moved an inch off square one, after fifty-one years. Clapping hands about too long a future, still, running on a treadmill, including running a funding treadmill, going absolutely nowhere except to eventual inevitably infinitely untenable costs, retreat (again), retrenchment (again), and finally extinction.Reply -
Torbjorn Larsson It is important that they tested the docking as the active agent:Reply
This dynamic testing demonstrated that the Starship system could perform a “soft capture” while in the active docking role.
Docking to the new space station they need to be the active agent. But before that they will do propellant transfer in low Earth orbit, so Starships need to be able to dock with each other.
Why would anyone want to mine on the Moon now that it will be cheap enough to lift to Earth orbit - and land on Moon if necessary (with Starship, say)? It won't be economical.Atlan0001 said:A construction facility to make construction facilities, progressively to make construction facilities, ever more of them ever widening. And a mining base on the Moon. What is not even on drawing boards yet after fifty-one years that I know of. Every thing is still square one, has not moved an inch off square one, after fifty-one years. Clapping hands about too long a future, still, running on a treadmill, including running a funding treadmill, going absolutely nowhere except to eventual inevitably infinitely untenable costs, retreat (again), retrenchment (again), and finally extinction.
Large scale construction (and production) facilities will make sense for Mars colonists and further out in the system. On the Moon, only for science projects (short term, maybe tourists later).
The last part seems to make no sense, since NASA has researched the context of astronaut survival and long travel times for e.g. Mars. And (individual and) population extinction is the life trajectory of all species due to the natural process of evolution. Humans have already gotten 0.3 of the average 1 million years of mammal species lifetime under its belt. We can even hope for 2 million years (or more), since Erectus managed it.
Resistance to extinction is futile, and it's no big deal. Evidently evolution is a sturdy process (has lasted 1/3 of the universe lifetime already, asymptoting towards 100 %). And whether or not humans become a spacefaring civilization for the foreseeable future we will go extinct but life will likely not. Spacefaring may hasten the process since sexual subpopulations need on average 1 crossbreeding per generation to not split into new species, we need e.g. martian colonies to be reachable. Humans are destined to be a an average lifetime local species whether or not we will have descendants colonizing other systems. -
Atlan0001
'The High Frontier', by Gerard K. O'Neill.Torbjorn Larsson said:It is important that they tested the docking as the active agent:
Docking to the new space station they need to be the active agent. But before that they will do propellant transfer in low Earth orbit, so Starships need to be able to dock with each other.
Why would anyone want to mine on the Moon now that it will be cheap enough to lift to Earth orbit - and land on Moon if necessary (with Starship, say)? It won't be economical.
Large scale construction (and production) facilities will make sense for Mars colonists and further out in the system. On the Moon, only for science projects (short term, maybe tourists later).
The last part seems to make no sense, since NASA has researched the context of astronaut survival and long travel times for e.g. Mars. And (individual and) population extinction is the life trajectory of all species due to the natural process of evolution. Humans have already gotten 0.3 of the average 1 million years of mammal species lifetime under its belt. We can even hope for 2 million years (or more), since Erectus managed it.
Resistance to extinction is futile, and it's no big deal. Evidently evolution is a sturdy process (has lasted 1/3 of the universe lifetime already, asymptoting towards 100 %). And whether or not humans become a spacefaring civilization for the foreseeable future we will go extinct but life will likely not. Spacefaring may hasten the process since sexual subpopulations need on average 1 crossbreeding per generation to not split into new species, we need e.g. martian colonies to be reachable. Humans are destined to be a an average lifetime local species whether or not we will have descendants colonizing other systems.
'Colonies in Space', by T. A. Heppenheimer.
And so on so forth....
Very little will come down to Earth except foods, trade goods, energies in increasing vacuums to be filled, and wealth. Going up, industrial expansion (industries from Earth), expanding opportunity, expanding life, and some early trace salting of environments. Everything sought in frontier expansionism flying in the face of the "usual suspect" naysayers, usual to all history everywhere, who would have life run in place on treadmills to a mass in-turning -- increasingly energy-less -- entropic nowhere but extinction. An ever increasing internal mediocrity. A combustible life increasingly violence and fracture bent.
Homelands have always become internal accelerating expansionist new frontiers from accelerating expansions to external New Frontiers. The Old World always a New World because of expanding outer New World (in this case proliferating space island 'Ark' colonies among other ever widening custom space facilitations) frontiers.