Climate change hits Antarctica hard, sparking concerns about irreversible tipping points

Satellite images show that the amount of sea ice floating around Antarctica remains too low during the winter season.
Sea ice around the coast of Antarctica protects the continents glaciers from melting. (Image credit: ESA)

Antarctica may be in serious trouble. Satellite images show that the amount of sea ice floating around the pristine polar continent remains far below long-term averages despite the south polar region moving into its peak winter period.

Researchers at the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) observed with trepidation in late 2022 and early 2023 as satellite images revealed that sea ice attached to the coast of Antarctica had been disappearing month after month at a pace never seen before. And they continued to observe in near horror as this sea ice failed to sufficiently replenish after the colder months arrived. As of mid-June 2023, sea ice extent in Antarctica was about 0.9 million square miles (2.28 million square kilometers) below the average from 1981 to 2010 for that part of the year, according to the U.K. weather authority Met Office, and about 0.4 million square miles (1.15 million square km) below the previous June record low from 2019. 

Related: 10 devastating signs of climate change satellites can see from space

This development is a worrying deviation from a previous trend that saw Antarctica hold quite steady against progressing climate change, which has long been decimating its northern counterpart, the Arctic. Scientists now worry that the frozen southernmost continent, which plays a crucial role in stabilizing the global climate, may be reaching its tipping point, a point of no return beyond which the polar ecosystem as we know it won't be able to survive. 

"In the Arctic, we have seen a steady decline [of sea ice] over time," Peter Fretwell, a remote-sensing scientist at the BAS, told Space.com. "Antarctica, up until 2016, was steady, even getting more sea ice, which we couldn't understand. But since 2016, it's gone down, and it's going down even more at the moment. Something has happened, and it's gone down suddenly very much."

The amount of floating ice surrounding the polar continent dropped to an all-time low in late February this year, shrinking to 691,000 square miles (1.79 million square km). That's 50,000 square miles (130,000 square km) below the previous record low of February 2022, according to NASA, which followed a previous record low from 2021. 

The problem is, as Fretwell said, that "what happens to Antarctica doesn't just stay in Antarctica." The warming polar seas affect weather patterns all over the world and accelerate the melting of Antarctic glaciers that, in turn, will lead to faster sea level rise around the globe. 

Penguins on an Antarctic iceberg.

The loss of Antarctic sea ice threatens some penguin species. (Image credit: ducation Images/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)

"Climate change is affecting the polar regions faster than anywhere else in the world. They're really at the frontline of climate change," Fretwell said. "But we know that sea ice drives deep water currents around the world, and it has consequences around the world." 

The three consecutive years of unprecedented sea ice loss also bode ill for many of the continent's species that are unlikely to survive anywhere else. Fretwell and his team are currently scouring satellite images for evidence of the impacts on populations of animals that are known to rely on sea ice for breeding. 

For example, changes in sea ice previously decimated one of the largest colonies of the iconic emperor penguin. That colony lost three generations of chicks after sea ice in the Halley Bay in the Weddell Sea broke up too early in the season in 2016, 2017 and 2018. Emperor penguin chicks huddle on the sea ice while their parents fish for food, as they can't enter the frigid water before developing their outer feathers. When the sea ice disintegrates underneath the colony, the chicks drown or freeze to death. 

Eight years of melting of the Pine Island Glacier.

Eight years of melting of Antarctica's Pine Island Glacier. (Image credit: Copernicus/SentinelHub/Iban Ameztoy)

The alarming decrease of sea ice is also a bad omen for Antarctica's glaciers, which would, without the buffer of coastal sea ice, become directly exposed to the warming ocean waters. A flurry of recent studies has explored the condition of the melting Thwaites glacier, a vast frozen river flowing into the Amundsen Sea. Dubbed the Doomsday glacier, Thwaites is one of the most vulnerable ice masses in Antarctica. Currently contributing 4% to the global sea level rise, Thwaites could single-handedly increase global sea levels by 26 inches (65 centimeters) if it were to melt completely, according to estimates.

Previous studies have shown that the Thwaites Ice Shelf, a stable floating mass of ice that protects the continental glacier, may completely collapse by the early 2030s, a process that might accelerate if the current trend of vanishing sea ice continues. But Fretwell thinks that all is not lost yet.

"There is still time to stop this oil tanker of climate change," Fretwell said. "But there is not much time. We now have decades of warming oceans and warming temperatures wired into the system, so if we stop putting carbon in the atmosphere, the world will still continue to heat for decades to come."

Humankind's failure to stop emitting greenhouse gases might result in a new Antarctica, one completely different from the continent that we know today. And researchers have no way of knowing how close to this new world we have come. 

"With tipping points, you never know whether you've come past one," Fretwell said. Sea ice levels "might come back, but right now, we are in a horrible state of wondering whether it's going to come back or continue on this track."

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Tereza Pultarova
Senior Writer

Tereza is a London-based science and technology journalist, aspiring fiction writer and amateur gymnast. Originally from Prague, the Czech Republic, she spent the first seven years of her career working as a reporter, script-writer and presenter for various TV programmes of the Czech Public Service Television. She later took a career break to pursue further education and added a Master's in Science from the International Space University, France, to her Bachelor's in Journalism and Master's in Cultural Anthropology from Prague's Charles University. She worked as a reporter at the Engineering and Technology magazine, freelanced for a range of publications including Live Science, Space.com, Professional Engineering, Via Satellite and Space News and served as a maternity cover science editor at the European Space Agency.

  • Macadoodle
    Admin said:
    The extent of sea ice surrounding Antarctica has fallen to a historic minimum this year, triggering concerns that the pristine polar continent might be reaching a climate change tipping point.

    Climate change hits Antarctica hard, sparking concerns about irreversible tipping points : Read more
    Nobody cares. Nothing we do in the western world will have any impact, so stop expecting us to live in caves to accomplish nothing.
    Reply
  • murgatroyd
    Pride Month isn't over yet, space.com! We want rainbow-colored LGBTQWERTY articles every day until the end of the month! There'll be plenty of time for fear-mongering climate panic articles the rest of the year! You slackers!
    Reply
  • Ken Fabian
    These kinds of concerns are only going to grow as real world consequences of global warming accelerate and become more frequent and more severe - because Doubt, Deny, Delay politics with scapegoating of climate scientists and anyone who takes it seriously ("fear-mongering slackers"?) has prevented bipartisan efforts to act and the divisions in turn reducing the effectiveness of policies by those that do believe taking the top level expert advice seriously is the responsibility of those holding positions of highest trust


    Currently the global heat imbalance is running at record highs and accelerating.

    The ocean heat content is at record highs - well before el Nino has even kicked in. Greenland and Antarctica between them are seeing so much ice loss that it adds up to more than 50 metric tons of melt per year for each person on Earth over the last decade.

    Every real world indicator and measure shows we have a serious climate problem - and despite the efforts to promote and encourage fear driven slackers to fear taking action more than they fear destabilising the climate regime of our world large parts of mainstream politics are increasingly serious about. But the effectiveness of those efforts are greatly reduced by the persistent efforts to disparage and oppose and force reduced ambitions and compromise (followed in turn by "See? Action is ineffective!").

    If climate activism gets coloured green and leans left it is because those leaning right failed to participate - and went out of their way to frame the issue as green and left in order to discredit the issue. Which arose from long running science programs that previously had bipartisan supported. Activists might have presented as the loudest voices but they only became the spokespersons for action by the failures of mainstream politics to show leadership. I think that is changing, but climate science denial has been profoundly damaging. Likely hundreds of millions of lives will be seriously harmed by that choice to oppose and obstruct. But having taught so many people to distrust climate science and to reject arguments based on facts or reason it has become difficult to turn around and act responsibly without alienating the Murgatroyds, so they double down instead.
    Reply
  • Helio
    Is the Arctic September sea ice doomed to disappear in the 2030’s?Probably not.
    Reply
  • murgatroyd
    The Ken Fabians hate hate hate Judith Curry, much more than they hate the loony-tunes flatearthers and CO2 greenhouse effect deniers.

    Why? Because she is reasonable, judicious, data-driven, and fair. (And she engages with the public, including detractors and critics.)

    Like many of the most eminent scientists in the field (excluding the vastly greater number of mediocrities with their snouts in the trough), she is a "lukewarmer", meaning that while she recognizes a human impact on climate, she rejects the overblown, fear-inducing projections of questionable models, the cherry-picking of data, the dishonest machinations ("hide the decline"), to say nothing about the horrendous consequences to human flourishing of obsessing about CO2 to the exclusion of so many important challenges facing us all.
    Reply
  • Helio
    murgatroyd said:
    The Ken Fabians hate hate hate Judith Curry, much more than they hate the loony-tunes flatearthers and CO2 greenhouse effect deniers.

    Why? Because she is reasonable, judicious, data-driven, and fair. (And she engages with the public, including detractors and critics.)

    Like many of the most eminent scientists in the field (excluding the vastly greater number of mediocrities with their snouts in the trough), she is a "lukewarmer", meaning that while she recognizes a human impact on climate, she rejects the overblown, fear-inducing projections of questionable models, the cherry-picking of data, the dishonest machinations ("hide the decline"), to say nothing about the horrendous consequences to human flourishing of obsessing about CO2 to the exclusion of so many important challenges facing us all.
    The link I used is to an article by Frank Bosse, though posted on her website. I look forward to reading Curry’s new book, “Climate Uncertainty and Risk”. It’s telling that the crisis-baters won’t debate her.
    Reply
  • Macadoodle
    Ken Fabian said:
    These kinds of concerns are only going to grow as real world consequences of global warming accelerate and become more frequent and more severe - because Doubt, Deny, Delay politics with scapegoating of climate scientists and anyone who takes it seriously ("fear-mongering slackers"?) has prevented bipartisan efforts to act and the divisions in turn reducing the effectiveness of policies by those that do believe taking the top level expert advice seriously is the responsibility of those holding positions of highest trust


    Currently the global heat imbalance is running at record highs and accelerating.

    The ocean heat content is at record highs - well before el Nino has even kicked in. Greenland and Antarctica between them are seeing so much ice loss that it adds up to more than 50 metric tons of melt per year for each person on Earth over the last decade.

    Every real world indicator and measure shows we have a serious climate problem - and despite the efforts to promote and encourage fear driven slackers to fear taking action more than they fear destabilising the climate regime of our world large parts of mainstream politics are increasingly serious about. But the effectiveness of those efforts are greatly reduced by the persistent efforts to disparage and oppose and force reduced ambitions and compromise (followed in turn by "See? Action is ineffective!").

    If climate activism gets coloured green and leans left it is because those leaning right failed to participate - and went out of their way to frame the issue as green and left in order to discredit the issue. Which arose from long running science programs that previously had bipartisan supported. Activists might have presented as the loudest voices but they only became the spokespersons for action by the failures of mainstream politics to show leadership. I think that is changing, but climate science denial has been profoundly damaging. Likely hundreds of millions of lives will be seriously harmed by that choice to oppose and obstruct. But having taught so many people to distrust climate science and to reject arguments based on facts or reason it has become difficult to turn around and act responsibly without alienating the Murgatroyds, so they double down instead.
    Complete and utter drivel
    Reply