Our Changing View of the Moon

History Corrected by 400-year-old Moon Map
The first drawing of the Moon through a telescope, dated July 26, 1609, by Thomas Harriot. This crude but historic sketch roughly delineates the terminator, the line that marks the boundary between day and night on the lunar surface. The original image is a little more than 15 cm across. The dark patches correspond to Mare Crisium (at the top), Mare Tranquilitatis and Mare Foecunditatis. (Image credit: © Lord Egremont)

The moon, so bright and large in the sky compared to other celestial objects, has captured the attention of humans at least since the dawn of consciousness. Over these eras, mankind's view of the moon has evolved, from the more mystical image of it as a god, to the thought it was covered in seas and vegetation. Most recently, it's been viewed as a dry and dusty wasteland.

Recent findings of water on the lunar surface could spur yet another shift in the way we see our orbiting companion.

The moon was the basis of several ancient calendars and used in determining astrological happenings. The cycle of the moon's waxing and waning was tracked by many cultures and helped give rise to the modern month (the rough time it takes to go from full moon to new moon and back again), as well the name of the second day of the week, Monday.

The moon has even been blamed for some of the darker forces of human nature, such as temporary insanity. The term lunatic (and "loony") comes from the Latin name for the moon and many criminal and insane behaviors were once blamed on the presence of a full moon.

The Man in the Moon -- an imaginary figure of a human, face, head or body -- has also long been a legend associated with the moon, and is still a feature spotted by children today. In the most commonly-recognized form in the West, the man's eyes are Mare Imbrium and Mare Serenitatis, its nose is Sinus Aestuum, and its open mouth is Mare Nubium and Mare Cognitum. In many European traditions, the figure is a man banished to the moon for some crime ? to some Christians, he is Cain, who murdered his brother Abel. To the Norse, he was Man?, who pulled the moon across the sky, while the ancient Chinese saw the figure of a rabbit pounding medicine.

Galileo Galilei challenged this notion when he trained his telescope on Earth's satellite and sketched its surface. As he wrote in his1610 treatise The Starry Messenger, Galileo saw that the moon's surface was in fact rough and rocky with dark, flat, low-lying regions and brighter highlands.(Though Englishman Thomas Harriot is actually credited with the first maps of the lunar surface.)

Satellites sent up into space took more and better pictures of the lunar surface. In 1959, the Soviet Union's Luna 3 probe gave mankind it's first look at the far side of the moon.

The Apollo landings changed all that and gave humanity it's first up-close look at the lunar surface. The 12 Apollo astronauts that landed on the moon photographed, sampled and explored the gray, dusty terrain.

All told, these missions brought back to Earth about 840pounds (381 kg) of lunar rocks, which scientists zapped and examined to learn more about the moon's makeup.

With the Apollo missions, "we answered so many fundamental questions," said planetary geologist Larry Taylor of the University of Tennessee, Knoxville.

From these missions, scientists learned that the dark lunar maria (Latin for "seas") were never actually seas, as was thought by the ancient astronomers, but instead were composed of basalts, a type of volcanic rock. The brighter highlands though turned out to be made of the mineral plagioclase feldspar, a common rock-building mineral on the Earth as well.

The astronauts' experience also showed that the lunar environment was as "hostile as can be," Taylor said, with temperatures soaring during the day and plummeting again at night, as well as "a better vacuum than we can do in our labs" here on Earth.

The possibility of life existing on the moon held even through the first moon landing. The Apollo 11 astronauts were quarantined for several days to make sure they hadn't brought back any germs from the moon or space.

"And that was really revolutionary," Taylor said.

Before the collision theory began to hold sway, other explanations for the moon's formation included fission of the Earth by centrifugal forces (the severed chunk leaving behind a large basin, usually named as the Pacific Ocean); capture of the moon after it formed elsewhere and wandered into the Earth's neighborhood; and formation at the same time as the Earth from the primordial accretion disk around the sun.

To further investigate the prospect of frozen water in polar old traps, NASA developed and launched the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO)and its partner LCROSS impactor. LRO's mission is to map the lunar surface, while LCROSS slams into one of the polar craters to see if the ejecta debris shows signs of the water ice.

But much to everyone's surprise, it was not LRO and LCROSS that first turned up definitive signs of lunar water, it was a NASA-built instrument on India's Chandrayaan-1 satellite, along with the Cassini and Deep Impact spacecraft.

The unexpected discovery is "one of the biggest findings post-Apollo," said Ray Arvidson. It could also be "a shot in the arm to lunar exploration," renewing interest in both robotic and human missions to our satellite, he added.

But whatever future missions are planned, one thing is certain: The existence of water on the moon changes the way we think about our satellite. Instead of a dead, gray rock orbiting the Earth, "it's a dynamic world in our backyard," said Jim Garvin, one that will help us learn more about the solar system we live in.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Andrea Thompson
Contributor

Andrea Thompson is an associate editor at Scientific American, where she covers sustainability, energy and the environment. Prior to that, she was a senior writer covering climate science at Climate Central and a reporter and editor at Live Science, where she primarily covered Earth science and the environment. She holds a graduate degree in science health and environmental reporting from New York University, as well as a bachelor of science and and masters of science in atmospheric chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology.