Voyage to the Stars: NASA Study Mulls Options

Voyage to the Stars: NASA Study Mulls Options
Artist’s concept of Interstellar Explorer swinging by Jupiter en route to a heliocentric distance of at least 200 astronomical units. (Image credit: Chris McNutt)

To send a spacecraft where none has gone before is a dream assignment for any space scientist and engineer.

The idea of dispatching a dedicated robotic probe on an interstellar trek has been seriously advocated for nearly 30 years. A recently finished appraisal of how to build such a craft shows that it is within reach -- but nonetheless remains a challenging task.

Put that in your cosmic calculator and you'll get: 18,591,186,595 miles (29,919,614,600 kilometers).

No matter how you figure it, that's a lot of infrequent flyer miles to travel.

"I think we're converging on something that's doable," said Ralph McNutt, the principal investigator for the Innovative Interstellar Explorer study. He is a space scientist at The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) in Laurel, Maryland, and also the project scientist for APL's Messenger mission to Mercury.

"There is always interest in keeping an interstellar probe going through various studies. But the problem that we've always run up against is propulsion. That's because you're trying to pull out all the stops and get out of the Solar System as fast as you can," McNutt told SPACE.com.

In sketching out IIE, McNutt said the relatively small spacecraft would use radioisotope power sources that energize small electric thrusters. "You need to make a spacecraft that is ?massless' as possible," he said, something akin to "unobtanium".

"We can start building them tomorrow, if we had the money," McNutt said. Efficient, lightweight electric propulsion and power systems are part of the key.

The interstellar probe would cruise out of the solar system at about 7.8 AU per year. It would accelerate to a "burnout" speed of 9.5 AU per year at 103 AU in November 2029.

"The IIE would end up being at 200 AU in about 2044," McNutt noted. "Yes, I know that sounds like a long time from now. But you have to keep this into perspective. When we started out with the Voyagers, none would have believed they'd still be going," he said.

In fact, the dual Voyager spacecraft launched in 1977 are now dubbed the Voyager Interstellar Mission (VIM), investigating the outermost edge of the Sun's domain ... and beyond. The Voyager probes are expected to go dead around 2025 as their plutonium-fueled generators are fully discharged.

The 30-year mission by IIE to address fundamental scientific questions about the interaction of the Sun with the interstellar medium, McNutt said, can only be answered via on-the-spot measurements that such a mission would provide. 

"The idea here is to try to get as close to true interstellar space as possible ... past the heliopause and past what we think is an external bow shock," McNutt pointed out.

"Designing something that's going to be good for 30 years ... that scares the daylights out of people," McNutt admitted. "How to qualify all the parts for decades of lifetime is a hard problem. But it's something that we're going to eventually come to terms with. We'll figure out how to deal with it."

Already in the works is a hoped for upgrade of NASA's Deep Space Network, turning huge antenna dish complexes into "receiver farms" -- that is, multiple numbers of smaller antennas. That could enable reception of downlink signal from IIE of about five kilobytes per second out at 200 AU, McNutt said.

At some point, as IIE keeps moving onward and outward, it will increasingly become more difficult for ground controllers on Earth to reprogram the spacecraft's onboard data processing unit. "The probe will then have to decide for itself when to phone home. It's not going to be you asking for the call," McNutt said.

"I can't answer why there was an outcry," McNutt said, "but I'm certainly glad there was one."

In a House of Representatives hearing last month, Congressman Vernon Ehlers of Michigan implored NASA chief, Michael Griffin, to keep a scientific ear attuned to Voyager. "It seems foolish to wait all these years to reach the heliosheath and then suddenly pull the plug," Ehlers told Griffin.

"I assure you that I also think it's rather dumb to be turning off Voyagers 1 and 2," Griffin responded. Nonetheless, a NASA assessment on what spacecraft will be kept in operation and which ones will not is to be wrapped up later this year, he added.

"This would be a stepping stone. A lot of people resonate with the science fiction side about taking the first step to the stars," McNutt said.

"Basically, it's kind of like throwing a note out in a bottle ... throwing it out to sea and seeing what comes back," McNutt said. "If we really want to understand the world around us, we ought to be out there making those measurements."

  • Interstellar Travelers Will Have to Watch Their Language
  • Sailing to the Stars: Sex and Society Aboard the First Starships
  • The Closest Star System: Alpha Centauri
  • NASA's Vision: Probes At Stars by 2100

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Leonard David
Space Insider Columnist

Leonard David is an award-winning space journalist who has been reporting on space activities for more than 50 years. Currently writing as Space.com's Space Insider Columnist among his other projects, Leonard has authored numerous books on space exploration, Mars missions and more, with his latest being "Moon Rush: The New Space Race" published in 2019 by National Geographic. He also wrote "Mars: Our Future on the Red Planet" released in 2016 by National Geographic. Leonard  has served as a correspondent for SpaceNews, Scientific American and Aerospace America for the AIAA. He has received many awards, including the first Ordway Award for Sustained Excellence in Spaceflight History in 2015 at the AAS Wernher von Braun Memorial Symposium. You can find out Leonard's latest project at his website and on Twitter.