Skip to main content

Black Holes Grow Hair, Then Go Bald Again

Spinning black hole.
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

Thanks to their tendency to suck in everything around them — even light — black holes don't divulge clues about their origins or histories. This frustrating fact led scientists in the 1960s to declare that black holes "have no hair." By this, researchers meant that black holes had very few distinguishing characteristics to separate one from another.

Now, new calculations suggest that some black holes can grow hair, but they can't keep it for long. According to the new work, black holes that spin at nearly (but not quite) the maximum rotation possible show some unique properties. But these properties don't persist long before the black hole goes "bald" and becomes indistinguishable from others of its sort.

"This is an interesting find, because it's a transient behavior," said study author Lior Burko, a physicist at Theiss Research in California.

Related: 9 Ideas About Black Holes That Will Blow Your Mind

The metaphor for black hole hair grew out of math done by physicists Jacob Bekenstein and John Wheeler in the 1960s and early 1970s. The researchers argued that under Einstein's general theory of relativity, black holes can be described by just three observable parameters: their mass, their angular momentum and their electric charge. Everything else, all other information, is trapped within the black hole's gravitational pull and is thus impossible to observe. Given two black holes that matched on all three values, it would be functionally impossible to differentiate one from the other.

Since then, theorists have been on the hunt for something that can distinguish black holes from one another. If scientists could find that something, it might open up new revelations about the origins of particular black holes. For instance, while many black holes are thought to be the remnants of collapsed stars, some may have formed right after the Big Bang, coalescing out of abnormally dense regions in the earliest universal fabric. One of these primordial black holes would be indistinguishable from a stellar black hole if the two had the same mass, angular momentum and electric charge.

In 2018, a group of researchers led by physicist Dejan Gajic, at the University of Cambridge, found that extreme black holes, those with the maximum possible electric charge, do have unique properties that can differentiate the objects from one another. These properties involved measurable changes to a black hole's event horizon (the point at which gravitational force is so strong that light can't escape) and its Cauchy horizon (the point at which the causal relationship between the past and the future breaks down due to the time-bending effects of a strong gravitational field).

Burko and his colleagues became interested in whether unique properties might hold in black holes that are almost extreme, but not quite. The researchers did the math for two kinds of black holes. The first is a nearly extreme Reissner-Nordström black hole, a type of black hole that has almost the maximum possible electric charge but doesn't rotate. The second, a nearly extreme Kerr black hole, is a type of black hole that rotates at nearly maximum spin but has no electric charge.

Related: 8 Ways You Can See Einstein's Theory of Relativity in Real Life

In both of these near-extreme black holes, the researchers found evidence of "hair" — for a time. The unique properties of near-extreme black holes are measurable when a simulated black hole first forms, the researchers reported Nov. 15 in the journal Physical Review Research, but decline over time in a quadratic function of time. That means the values shrink rapidly at first, then continue to shrink more slowly as time goes on. (The research team did not calculate how fast this would occur in real time, which would differ depending on the mass, spin and charge of a given black hole.)

"For a short time, [a nearly extreme black hole] behaves like it has hair like a maximally spinning black hole would," Burko told Live Science. "But after some time, it starts losing this hair so that eventually it becomes bald again."

While all of these calculations are currently theoretical, there is hope for real-world observations that would match or contradict the findings. The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) experiment is now actively measuring gravitational waves, which are ripples in space-time created by massive objects like neutron stars and black holes. LIGO uses two ground-based observatories to measure gravitational waves. And these measurements could provide a look at hairy black holes.

An upcoming project, the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA), will launch three spacecraft to detect gravitational waves from space. That project is designed to detect gravitational waves from supermassive black holes. There's no telling how long those experiments will have to run to catch a near-extreme black hole in action, Burko said, but if one turns up, its gravitational waves might have hair.

Originally published on Live Science.

All About Space Holiday 2019

Need more space? Subscribe to our sister title "All About Space" Magazine (opens in new tab) for the latest amazing news from the final frontier! (Image credit: All About Space)
(opens in new tab)

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at:

Stephanie Pappas
Live Science Contributor

Stephanie Pappas is a contributing writer for sister site Live Science, covering topics ranging from geoscience to archaeology to the human brain and behavior. She was previously a senior writer for Live Science but is now a freelancer based in Denver, Colorado, and regularly contributes to Scientific American and The Monitor, the monthly magazine of the American Psychological Association. Stephanie received a bachelor's degree in psychology from the University of South Carolina and a graduate certificate in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz. 

  • rod
    *primordial black holes* mentioned in this report. We should see more on this feature of the Big Bang cosmology I think. Also black holes dissipate - 2nd Law and entropy. Primordial black holes lack sufficient detail in the Big Bang, e.g. how many are there in our universe today, how many immediately after the Big Bang, etc.? Did primordial black holes form beyond the CMBR? Telescopes do not see beyond the CMBR barrier - we do not observe what may or may not be there.
  • JamesDeMeoPhD
    Black holes are a fantasy, a postulate that was originally formulated to account for gravitational anomalies in an empty-space dead universe. Such a condition was disproven repeatedly, even within the original Michelson-Morley experiment of 1887, which DID detect cosmic ether drift of around 5-7.5 kps max. The problem was, that velocity was too low to affirm the expected higher velocity of ~200 kps by way of Newtonian static ether theory. Dayton Miller got better results with a much more sophisticated interferometer atop Mt. Wilson, of around 10-11 kps, proving the ether was somewhat material, and could be entrained and slowed by Earth-friction at lower altitudes. He has been virtually erased from the history of science, except for a single highly-biased debunking article which could not, in the end, explain the systematic pointing of his ether drift to the same specific cosmic sidereal coordinates. In short, the ether is proven, has likely gravitational effects in the ether-filled domain of so-called "empty space", and light-speed is variable depending upon direction in the cosmos. With that, there is no need to postulate "black holes" much less "Machos" or "Wimps" and other invisible things that are hardly proven or fully unproven. How more metaphysical and bizarre must modern astrophysics become, to salvage such ideas as black holes, or the big-bang theory and Einstein's relativity for that matter. All rest upon the disproven assumption of empty space. Over 40 years first as university professor and later in private research have I watched astrophysics go increasingly out of touch with reality, but also fiercely shutting down opposing ideas, to the point of excommunicating top scientists like Halton Arp, and unknown numbers of clear-thinking students who could not accept the metaphysics. Top scientists over generations have opposed this new "geometrization" of space, arguing for an ether, but always getting shut down by either the mainstream, or by media sycophants of the mainstream. The erasure of opposition has not been complete, however. The following work may be of interest, presenting the dissenting views, also identifying serious flaws in the recent claims about an image of a black hole in M87. Look it up: The Dynamic Ether of Cosmic Space: Correcting a Major Error in Modern Science.