After about 5 billion years, the Milky Way will be no more. Our galaxy is set to collide with our neighbor Andromeda to create the so-called Milkomeda galaxy.
Astronomer Lauranne Lanz of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Mass., is part of a team that has assembled an atlas of colliding galaxies to better understand how these cosmic train wrecks occur.
SPACE.com talked to Lanz about what's in store for the Milky Way and whether the Earth is doomed.
SPACE.com: A collision of galaxies sounds violent. Is it?
Lauranne Lanz: When two galaxies collide, the stars don't collide into each other — that's the first thing to keep in mind.
What really happens is that the stars pass through each other kind of like a mesh, but their gases do collide, and in that process, that sparks the creation of new stars because when gas becomes dense it likes to form stars.So from that point of view, it is pretty violent, and it does look quite messy, but in a very pretty way. [Stunning Photos of Galaxy Collisions]
SPACE.com: So is the Milky Way definitely on a collision course?
Lanz: Oh, definitely. We know that Andromeda and the Milky Way are going to come together in about 5 billion years, which is roughly around the time that the sun will be puffing up into a red giant, so we'll have other problems at that point.
SPACE.com: Is the Earth doomed?
Lanz: When the sun expands, the Earth is going to get quite warm. So from the point of view of the sun, we're going to have problems.
From the point of view of Andromeda, we're not going to hit any other solar system. When new stars are created, since they live relatively shortly from the point of view of stars, and when you get massive stars you get supernovae, and you don't really want all that many in your neighborhood, so that's not good for us either.
But other than that not too many bad things will happen from colliding galaxies.
SPACE.com: How do you feel about the word Milkomeda?
Lanz: It's not that bad.
SPACE.com: What is the Milkomeda system going to look like?
Lanz: Very often they'll go through a messy phase where they've got arms everywhere. But if you give them long enough they settle into an elliptical, typically.
Are there usually signs of the galactic train wreck afterward?
SPACE.com: Lanz: If you look long enough after the collision, you're not going to see any traces.
One of the earlier projects that I did is looking at a system that had had a collision. It had a lot more dust than it should, which told us that it ate a spiral that had dust. So that's one way that you can potentially tell if a system has had a collision — if it's got stuff that you don't expect that type of galaxy to have.
SPACE.com: How common are galaxy collisions?
Lanz: As we understand the growth of galaxies over the entire age of the universe, we really think that small ones form and then clump together to form bigger ones. So really any large galaxy will have had multiple of these events.
Whether it's events with other large ones is unclear, but they've definitely had [collisions] themselves with tiny little ones that they eat up.
Get the Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!
Clara Moskowitz is a science and space writer who joined the Space.com team in 2008 and served as Assistant Managing Editor from 2011 to 2013. Clara has a bachelor's degree in astronomy and physics from Wesleyan University, and a graduate certificate in science writing from the University of California, Santa Cruz. She covers everything from astronomy to human spaceflight and once aced a NASTAR suborbital spaceflight training program for space missions. Clara is currently Associate Editor of Scientific American. To see her latest project is, follow Clara on Twitter.