Field Report: Astrobiologists Drill Into Antarctic Ice

The IceBreaker 2010 Antarctic team (from left to right): Wayne Pollard of McGill University, Andrew Jackson of Texas Tech, Alfonso Davila of NASA Ames, Margarita Marinova of NASA Ames, Gale Paulsen and Kris Zacny, from Honeybee Robotics. (Image credit: Kris Zacny)

This is mylast blog. I'm writing it somewhere over the Antarctic inside a C17airplane onour way from McMurdo Station to Christchurch, New Zealand. A C17 is averyimpressive airplane. We are sitting along the fuselage facing each other, withcargo in the middle. AC130 airplane propeller is right in front of me ? within my arms'reach. To theleft, I see our bags we dropped off last night, and to the right, somepeoplesleeping on the floor. Only now do I realize that the Antarcticadventure iscoming to a close.

Our drillteam traveled to the Antarctic to test a new generation of arotary-percussivedrill, called the IceBreaker.The drill was designed as a prototype for a drill that one day will flyto Marsand penetrate at least 1 meter into Martian ice and permafrost.

We selectedUniversity Valley within Antarctica's Dry Valleys region as an idealMarsanalog and drilling test location for two reasons: (1) temperatures arerelatively low, reaching -25 degrees Celsius during the time we stayedthere(beginning of summer); and (2) University Valley has a desiccated layeroverlaying ice-cemented ground towards the valley's mouth and massiveicetowards the valley's head. NASA'sPhoenix mission in 2008 landed in the northern polar regionof Mars andfound ice below a few inches of sandy soil ? almost exactly what we seeinUniversity Valley.

Our firsttask was to assemble the drill in the field. Our system was broken downintosmall subsections that included a drill base, a vertical stage (whichhad neverbeen tested prior to this field campaign), the drill head, an augerwith a bitat the end, a sampling system (which had also never been tested), andelectronics. We rushed to meet the shipping deadline for Antarctic andhencedidn't have time to test some of its components. TheAntarctic would be the true testing ground.

The drillwent down again, but this time to a depth of 20 cm (8 inches), and cameupdepositing more samples. This process continued until we reach ourtarget of 1meter (40 inches). During this drilling process, our power was lessthan 100Watts (that's as much as a light bulb needs), the force of the bitpushingagainst the ground was less than 100 Newtons (around 20 lbs), and ittookaround 1 hour to reach 1 meter. We call it drilling with 1-1-100-100 (1hour to1m with 100 W and 100 N).

At the sametime we measured a temperature at the bit, to make sure we didn't heatit uptoo much. A warm bit will indicate that we are putting too much heatinto theformation, which may cause the ice within the soil or rock to melt. Wewant toavoid melting by all means, since thaw followed by re-freeze is themain causeof stuck drill bits in the Antarctic and other cold regions. Ourmaximum bittemperature was always less than -5 degrees C (23 degrees F) and onaverage itwas more like -10 degrees C (14 degrees F), that is, only 10 degrees Cabovethe ground temperature and 10 degrees C below melting temperature. Weweredrilling in a safe regime.

Drilling inice proved to be relatively easy, as expected. We drilled to 1 meter inno timeand collected samples. Upon close inspection of ice-chips, as they werecomingup the drill auger, we noticed that some of these ice chips are aslarge as 0.6cm (0.25 inch). That meant that our drilling approach doesn'tcompletelydestroy the ice. We can still acquire large ice chunks for eithervisual orother investigations.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.