NASA's Next Rocket May Shake Too Much

Boeing to Build Upper Stage of NASA's Ares I Rocket
An artist's rendition of Ares I being stacked in the vehicle assembly building at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. Houston-based Boeing won NASA's contract to built the rocket's upper stage, which appears in orange below the conical Orion crew capsule. (Image credit: NASA.)

WASHINGTON (AP) - NASA iswrestling with a potentially dangerous problem in a spacecraft, this time in amoon rocket that hasn't even been built yet.

Engineers are concernedthat the new rocket meant to replace the space shuttle and send astronauts on theirway to the moon could shake violently during the first few minutes offlight, possibly destroying the entire vehicle.

?They know it's a realproblem,'' said Carnegie Mellon University engineering professor PaulFischbeck, who has consulted on risk issues with NASA in the past. ?This thingis going to shake apart the whole structure, and they've got to solve it.''

?I hope no one was soill-informed as to believe that we would be able to develop a system to replacethe shuttle without facing any challenges in doing so,'' NASA administratorMichael Griffin said in a statement to The Associated Press. ?NASA hasan excellent track record of resolving technical challenges. We're confidentwe'll solve this one as well.''

Professor Jorge Arenas ofthe Institute of Acoustics in Valdivia, Chile, acknowledged that the problemwas serious but said: ?NASA has developed one of the safest and risk-controlled space programs in engineering history.''

The concern isn't theshaking on the first stage, but how it affects everything that sits on top: theOrion crew capsule, instrument unit, and a booster.

Those vortices happen tomatch the natural vibrating frequencies of the motor's combustion chamber, andthe combination causes the shaking.

NASA engineerscharacterized the shaking as being in what the agency considers the ``redzone'' of risk, ranking a five on a 1-to-5 scale of severity.

?It's highly likely tohappen and if it does, it's a disaster,'' said Fischbeck, an expert inengineering risks.