There is no question satellites are
indispensable in the modern world for government and commercial users alike. In
addition to being an integral part of the global economy, they are essential to
national security. That is why improving the partnership between the U.S.
government and industry is so important.
The commercial satellite industry
permeates our daily lives and contributes more than $90 billion to the global economy. It offers a wide variety of services
and applications that include: cable companies, television networks,
financial institutions, major retailers, utilities, first responders, schools,
hospitals, businesses, Internet service providers, consumers, and federal, state and local government agencies.
The homeland security and first
responder communities use commercial satellites for a
range of critical activities. Here are a few examples:
- White
House Communications Agency (WHCA) uses commercial satellite communications
systems extensively to support the president and vice president.
-
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and their Federal Air Marshals use satellite
communications while in flight to communicate with staff on the ground.
- United States Coast Guard
(USCG) uses commercial satellite communications for ship-to-ship and
ship-to-shore communications and for container security and tracking.
- Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI) maintains satellite phones in every field office.
And there are
many more. Satellite communications also have played a critical role in responding to each of the natural and man-made disasters
in recent years including 9/11, the Asian tsunami, the earthquake in Pakistan
and the 2005 hurricane season.
Military
forces are perhaps the most dependent upon space-based communications systems.
The Defense Department currently uses a mix of military satellite
communications systems and commercial satellite communications to meet its
global deployed communications requirements.
Unmanned
Aerial Vehicles such as the Predator and Global Hawk
are heavy users of commercial satellite bandwidth. The U.S. Army's Blue Force
Tracking program uses satellite links to provide battlefield situational
awareness directly to soldiers and commanders, greatly reducing the potential
for friendly-fire incidents.
The Armed
Forces Radio and Television Service provides news and morale programming to our
troops around the globe via satellite. Telemedicine via satellite puts the
resources of world-class trauma specialists and surgeons at the disposal of
medical teams on the battlefield.
In 2005 alone, the Defense
Department spent over $650 million on commercial satellite communications
equipment and capacity. It is projected to spend more than $1 billion dollars per year by 2010
as noted in a recent Northern Sky Research forecast.
Given this
reliance on commercial satellite communications, during the last five years the satellite industry
has spent thousands of hours and millions of dollars working with the federal
government to ensure the security and reliability of the commercial satellite
infrastructure.
In 2003, the
National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee established the Satellite Task Force
to review infrastructure protection measures for commercial satellite networks
used for national security and emergency preparedness communications.
Through its
satellite infrastructure vulnerability analysis, the Satellite Task Force found
that just as with all other telecommunications services, commercial satellite
systems are susceptible to intentional and unintentional threats to varying
degrees.
Intentional
threats include jamming to the uplink and downlink communications signals. An
example of uplink jamming occurred in the summer of 2003 when a signal
emanating from Cuba jammed a U.S. satellite transmission to Iran on a
commercial communications satellite.
Satellites
also are vulnerable to both natural and
man-made phenomena in space. For example, satellites are susceptible to solar
flares and solar mass ejections, as well as physical collision with space
debris.
After its
in-depth review, the Satellite Task Force Report and the Defense Department concluded that the satellite
industry is taking the steps necessary to mitigate these potential
vulnerabilities.
For the last
three years, the satellite industry also has been meeting with Pentagon leadership to discuss
mission assurance - recently the Defense Department created the
Mission Assurance Working Group and invited industry participation.
Ongoing
activities that the industry and the Pentagon currently are working on within the
Mission Assurance Working Group include:
- Information
sharing and analysis regarding potential threats;
- Jamming and
purposeful interference to commercial satellite
systems;
- Development
of a common operating procedure with respect to in-orbit "close approaches"
between military and commercial satellites; and,
- Integration
of the commercial satellite industry into Defense Department training
exercises and war games.
Industry is
willing to comply with these new requirements and in return expects the
Pentagon to adopt commercial best practices such as
long-term leasing and incorporating commercial satellites into their long-term
planning and Transformational Communications Architecture.
The commercial satellite industry is
fully focused on eliminating potential vulnerabilities to the extent
technically and economically feasible. We therefore recommend that the U.S. government develop a national
commercial satellite communication policy that:
1. Relies to the maximum practical
extent on commercial satellite communications systems to meet the unclassified
communications needs of the U.S. government;
2. Maintains
robust satellite technology development programs such as the Transformation
Satellite Program;
3. Improve
current U.S. export control laws for commercial satellites and their
components;
4. Preserves
and protects satellite spectrum from harmful interference; and
5. Supports the development and
deployment of innovative satellite technologies and services.
Improving the
partnership between the U.S. government and industry will help
lower costs, guarantee better service and increase security. Such a partnership is
in the long-term interests of our military, our first responders and our citizens.
David Cavossa
is executive director of the Satellite Industry Association (SIA). The
commentary above was excerpted from testimony SIA presented June 21 to the
House Armed Services strategic forces subcommittee.