SEARCH:
Featured Book:

The Hand of God: Thoughts and Images Reflecting the Spirit of the Universe

by editor Michael Reagan

"... For centuries theologians had appealed to the "God of the gaps." This God is the one whom you offer in explaination for phenomena that otherwise had none. Did the rains come? God brought them (until meteorologists discovered how a specific combination of atmospheric pressure and humidity brings rain). Did the Sun rise? God lifted it (until astronomers figured out that the Earth rotates on its axis once a day). Did life arise? God created it (until biologists discovered how abiotic molecules can replicate and evolve.

Thanks to the discoveries of 20th-century science, the gaps were growing ever fewer. It seemed that there was less and less for God to do. Astronomy and physics stepped in to explain that Earth formed when a disc of dust and gas spinning around the Sun condensed - another gap closed. Nuclear physics then came forward with an explanation for how stars burn through the fusion of hydrogen nucleii. Quantum mechanics, which was developed in the early 1900s, closed what had been considered the ultimate gap: the origin of the universe itself. This branch of physics has shown that there can be effects without causes, that material things can pop into and out of existence thanks to bizarre - but experimentally proven - phenomena called quantum fluctuations. Quantum mechanics shook science's foundations to such an extent that even Einstein found its concepts intolerable. He argued the subject endlessly with fellow scientist Max Born: "The theory yields much, but it hardly brings us close to the secrets of the Old One," Einstein wrote in a letter to Born, adding his famous remark: "In any case, I am convinced He does not play dice."

In the last few years cosmologists have offered a nearly airtight case that the universe itself could have originated naturally, not supernaturally, from the Big Bang. Even if few people could grasp the science on which this conclusion rested, its implications were clear - and deeply unsettling. Theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking, who has done much to popularize the new physics, put the question most succinctly: "So long as the universe had a beginning, we could suppose it had a Creator. but if the universe is really completely self-contained, what place, then, for a Creator ...?"

-- from Sharon Begley's introduction to The Hand of God

> READ MORE DOWNLOAD PDF FILE

> CLICK HERE TO BUY THIS BOOK  
Is there a God?

For many millennia humanity has asked itself this question; it has looked within the individual and far beyond Earth for the answer, attempting to prove God's existence either through blind faith or empirical science.

However, as each curtain was pulled back, as each secret was resolved, new questions arose and the proof - for or against God's existence - remains elusive.

In 1999, Michael Reagan, the founder of Lionheart Books, decided that God was - as they say - in the details. Indeed, God's presence was a part of the mystery of our universe; a place made that much more accessible to humanity by the power of the Hubble Space Telescope.

With this in mind Reagan published The Hand of God: Thoughts and Images Reflecting the Spirit of the Universe, a compendium of the Hubble and other observatory's most amazing pictures combined with the thoughts and ruminations of many of Earth's greatest secular and spiritual thinkers about the idea of God and his, her, or its handiwork.

The Hand of God is now in paperback and Reagan took the time to answer a few of SPACE.com's loftier questions:

library_reagan_011221

 

SPACE.com: In your foreword to 'The Hand of God' you write that it was a book you had been thinking about for awhile since you saw the first Hubble Space Telescope images. Did images like the star clusters of the Eagle Nebula cause a spiritual awakening in your life, or did they just strengthen your pre-existing beliefs?

Michael Reagan: That is a difficult question to answer, kind of a chicken and egg thing. I would have to say they were probably pre-existing, but certainly dormant for many many years.

Science and religion often seem poles apart. Do you believe that the so-called schism between science and religion is an artificial divide and that, as Sharon Begley so eloquently puts it in her introduction to the book "science explains what is, religion offers a sense of what ought to be?"

Yes I do. When you push out to the limits of science, there is usually a mystical element, something that cannot be explained. Richard Preston probably summed it up best in his book First Light: "Science at the cutting edge, conducted by sharp minds probing deep into nature, is not about self-evident facts. It is about mystery and not knowing. It is about taking huge risks. It is about wasting time, getting burned, and failing. It is like trying to crack a monstrous safe that has a complicated lock designed by God." On the other side (religion) the problem lies with ideological zealots who have a literal interpretation of their "religion". The spiritual notion that God is infinite seems to say it all.

What frustrates you most about the secularist scientists or the religious ideologues that refuse to bridge the divide?

The same thing that frustrates me about many things: That the ability of many people to resolve conflicts is severely limited by their ideology. I believe that a rigid belief system whether it is religious, scientific or social is a severe impediment to creative problem solving.

In the realms of science and spirituality, who are your heroes?

In science: Einstein, Freeman Dyson and Galileo. Spiritual: Gandhi

In the course of researching the quotes in the book, was there a common thread you noticed in how humanity viewed the cosmos?

Generally speaking it is with awe and wonder, with a touch of fear of the unknown mixed in for good measure.

What is the most beautiful aspect to space?

Beyond the spectacular imagery, it is the idea of the infinite, because I think it is there that God resides.

Looking at the various images in The Hand of God, which celestial place would you most like to travel?

I think being able to fly around and explore the center of the Milky Way would be an extraordinary experience.

Why should we spend money on space exploration over research into deadly diseases?

I sincerely hope that it never comes down to either /or. We need to do both in significant ways. I think at the core of our being is our intellectual curiosity, we have a need to discover things. In the immortal words of Star Trek, "to go where no man has gone before".

At the advent of the 21st Century what is the most vexing question facing humanity today?

Where are we going?


     about us | FREE Email Newsletter | message boards | register at SPACE.com | contact us | advertise | terms of service | privacy statement      DMCA/Copyright

     © Imaginova Corp. All rights reserved.