SEARCH:
Featured Book:

KOSMOS: A Portrait of the Russian Space Age

by Adam Bartos, Photographer; Svetlana Boym, Essay

"... One of the veterans of the Soviet space program remembers the excitement of the day Sputnik was launched into space:

The words 'beginning of the Space Age' were not spoken by any of us. They were the contribution of journalists. In the evenings, all of us poured out onto the street, away from light sources, and awaited the appearance of the quickly moving, pale asterisk that we had thrown into the sky. By some deep intuition we understood that this asterisk marked a star moment in each of our individual lives.

Sputnik appeared to mark a victory over nature itself. In tihs recollection, the word 'asterisk' is striking: it refers both to the little satellite in the sky and the reference mark used in printing. Sputnik's engineers had a feeling they were able to write in the sky. They were not merely observing the remote stars but creating new ones, and they were in awa of their own creation."

Every fairy tale we read in our early childhood spoke to us about a space journey. Whenever the Russian hero Ivan the Fool found himself on the crossroads, ordered to go 'there nobody knows where' to find 'that nobody knows what,' we suspected he traveled into space, just like Gagarin. In high school, our cosmic fascination turned into romance. The first Soviet cosmonaut became the object of popular adoration. When he died a tragic, early death in 1968, a song addressing him with the intimate 'you' was sung nationwide:

The earth is empty without you. How can I survive these lonely hours? Only the stars share with you their ten-der-ness.

This cosmic romance, however, did not survive our teenage years. The sense of its demise dates back to the early 1960s, when we started to prefer the yellow submarine of a smuggled Beatles album to yet another rocket, which seemed to fly only on the front page of the newspaper Pravda. Like the cosmonaut himself, the dream of cosmos proved mortal ..."

- from KOSMOS: Remembrances of the Future

> READ MORE DOWNLOAD PDF FILE

> CLICK HERE TO BUY THIS BOOK  
With KOSMOS, Adam Bartos captures the power and strength of the former Soviet Union's space industry in all its complexity and contradictions.

Between 1995 and 1998, Bartos, a New York-based photographer, traveled through the former Communist country and its satellite nations, photographing the people and places that put the first spacecraft and humans into orbit.

KOSMOS is a visual feast that lauds that which is so often lost in the histories of man's conquest of space: the human element.

SPACE

SPACE.com: How did you become interested in the former Soviet/Russian space program? Have you always had an interest in the topic?


Preview pictures in PDF Format

Adam Bartos: In late 1993, Sotheby’s had an extraordinary collection of objects and memorabilia on display in New York for their first Russian space history auction. Not being a space buff, I had gone mostly for the novelty of seeing these things in such an incongruous setting. Once there, I was fascinated with the material – the hand-built character of it impressed me, and the charts, notebooks, uniforms, trophies, and hardware all shared a powerful aesthetic attraction. After some time, I noticed a commotion being made around a gregarious Russian nearby. This was the first man to walk in space, Alexei Leonov. I went over to have him sign my catalogue and asked him (since he spoke English) if he thought it sad that this great patrimony was on the block in New York. Sweeping his arm around, he answered, "we have tons of this stuff." That planted the germ of an idea. Most of my work has involved design and some aspect of twentieth century utopianism (my previous book was on the UN Headquarters in New York). The Russian space program fit into this scheme as the last myth of a Soviet utopia.

Your images of Baikonur capture a place frozen in time, as if the 1980s and 1990s never happened, were you surprised by this when you first arrived?

The first morning in Baikonur, after a sleepless night due to a plane delay, I found myself running alongside the Soyuz in the middle of the Kazakh desert. I was virtually alone with the rocket and its locomotive, trying to avoid falling into gopher’s holes as I ran ahead to photograph it being pushed to the pad. The strongback erector on which it rested and the rocket itself were painted and outlined in many beautiful colors – it was as if a model had been made more than life size. This was all very surprising. The cosmodrome is an enormous palimpsest. Vestiges of the entire program can be found there, and some of the facilities are quite up to date looking, though naturally I chose to focus on what appealed to me as an artist.

Despite the Russian Space Agency's economic problems, the program is still a great source of pride. Did you get that feeling?

I was very impressed by what I saw. The lack of resources makes the accomplishments that much more striking. I did get a sense of the pride people take in their work, and their interest in posterity is evident. Every company has a museum and sometimes school children visit these. Many times in the U.S., when I’ve told people what my book is about, they immediately say something disparaging – expressing surprise that the program still exists, or making a quip about tin cans and so on, which is sad, and misinformed.

Often when presented with furniture and architectural designs from a bygone era it's easy to view these elements in a kitschy or ironic, even dismissive, light. You avoid this trap and imbue the non-human subjects - whether it's a couch or a telephone in Baikonur - with a certain nobility. Was that intentional? Or is that how you view history?

The customary irony and skepticism that the abundant totalitarian kitsch evokes may be justified. On the other hand, the sentiment behind it is not necessarily a fitting object of scorn. I wanted to create an atmosphere with the pictures that had a fluid approach to time, almost as if I was travelling through it and recording certain milestones – even if it might be a tea service or a telephone. I think these objects tell a story, and the fact that they are preserved faithfully helps to imbue them with a certain nobility. Also, Korolov’s telephone in Baikonur is not exactly the phone next door.

What impressed you most about the current state of the Russian space program?

I was most impressed that the facilities and companies allowed me to photograph them at all. I’m not sure that any U.S. companies would welcome a Russian national with a camera. Also, it was interesting to note how different from one another these places can be, in prosperity, and corporate culture. Some are much more bureaucratic and "Soviet" than others are. Often I was asked to photograph the company hierarchy. I was happy to do this except that it would eat into the time I had to do my own work, and they could be very strict about when it was time to go, which was anguishing. Otherwise, the Russian space program remains an awesome entity, though very much contracted from its heyday.

Many of the engineers you photographed worked in great secrecy at the height of the Cold War, did you get a sense of frustration that they toiled away in obscurity or that their work was dictated by political and not scientific needs?

I’m a photographer and I spent more time taking pictures than having conversations, especially given the language barrier. I suppose it would be an individual matter. I was often aware, however, of an energy and excitement, still palpable, concerning the work that was done and the period associated with the early days of the program. Just about everyone who agreed to be photographed was strikingly energetic for their age and this in a country where the average life expectancy is now 58.

Do you have any plans to photograph NASA's Kennedy Space Center or Johnson Space Center? Despite the frequent space shuttle missions and the ongoing International Space Station venture, there's definitely a Kennedy-esque "new frontier" feeling to these places.

If I had a good guide to these places I would certainly be interested in seeing them.

Do you think the public's interest in space exploration, both in Russia and the U.S. has waned?

I think that in the absence of the Space Race and identifiable heroes, it has. People have other worries. It’s interesting to reflect on the excitement that John Glenn’s shuttle trip caused.

At present, the asking price for a trip to space in a Soyuz capsule is about $20 million, would you go if you could afford it?

The idea of being cooped up in a capsule for a long period of time doesn’t appeal to me. Also, having stood very close to a Soyuz lifting off, I don’t underestimate how frightening it must be to ride on one. I wouldn’t mind going to another launch at Baikonur, however.


     about us | FREE Email Newsletter | message boards | register at SPACE.com | contact us | advertise | terms of service | privacy statement      DMCA/Copyright

     © Imaginova Corp. All rights reserved.