Today, newspapers have printed
pictures of a barren Martian surface, but the planet still fascinates scientists
and science fiction writers. It's the focal point of new disciplines like
comparative planetology and terraforming, and a crystal ball for our hopes
of civilization and fears of ecological devastation.
Early views
Mars' proximity to Earth
and clearly visible surface features once led scientists to conclude that
the two planets were nearly identical in climate, geography and life forms.
"[Mars] has a considerable
but moderate atmosphere, so that its inhabitants probably enjoy a situation
in many respects similar to our own," wrote astronomer William Herschel
in 1781.
The supposed similarities
were reinforced during the 1777-78 opposition, when Mars comes closest
to Earth. Astronomer Giovanni Schiaparelli observed and mapped hundreds
of "canali," channels of water that became the famous canals of
Mars.
Percival Lowell studied Mars
for two decades, and theorized in 1896 that the Martians transported melting
water from polar icecaps in the canals to keep the planet from being overrun
by deserts.
Lowell imagined Mars as more
geographically and culturally evolved than Earth -- a society without political
divisions facing a deteriorating planet -- and pointed to Earth's deserts
as a sign that our planet faced the same fate.
"Earth, then, is going the
way of Mars," Lowell wrote.
Science fiction goes to
Mars
Lowell's theories,
while hotly debated, sparked the imagination of others.
"Lowell's vision of a dying
planet has shaped what writers could imagine and what their readers expect
about a fictional Mars," Markley explains. "On the red planet, humans confront
the consequences of ecological devastation: sparse resources, vast stretches
of desert, and thin or unbreathable air."
H. G. Wells' 1898 novel The
War of the Worlds expanded on Lowell's concept of Mars as a reflection
of Earth. The story of Martians rampaging through the civilized fields
of England became the archetypical alien invasion tale, and Wells intended
it to force Westerners to examine their own society.
"Before we judge of them
too harshly we must remember what ruthless and utter destruction our own
species has wrought, not only upon animals, such as the vanished bison
and the dodo, but upon its inferior races," Wells wrote. "Are we such apostles
of mercy as to complain if the Martians warred in the same spirit?"
Throughout the 20th century
Mars remained a focus for science fiction writers. In the wake of increasing
scientific skepticism about advanced life on Mars, novelists began to represent
Mars as a barren landscape that supported only primitive
life forms.
Even as the evidence that
Mars was dead mounted from orbital surveys and probe landings, SF writers
continued to find scenarios for life. Explorers found evidence of primitive
lichens in Ben Bova's 1992 novel Mars, while Greg Benford found
a plausible hiding place for even more complex life in his recent novel
The
Martian Race.
Mars in Earth's image
Despite the inventiveness
of SF writers, the orbital photography of Mariner 4 firmly established
Mars as a dead rather than dying planet. When subsequent missions revealed
evidence of tectonic activity, volcanic heat and times when water flowed
freely on the Martian surface, though, the possibility rose that Mars could
be brought back to life.
Carl Sagan and others proposed
the "long winter" model of Martian climatology, arguing that Mars had once
been a warmer and wetter planet that could have supported life. They also
speculated that Mars could be turned into a warm and wet planet once again
-- one that might be suitable for human habitation.
The idea of refashioning
Mars in Earth's image caught on. Novelists, poets, artists and screenwriters
began to explore the possibilities of terraforming and ecopoesis, the engineering
of a new Martian ecology.
In the 1990s, Kim Stanley
Robinson won critical acclaim and an armful of awards for his "Mars" trilogy,
which follows a group of colonists through a century-long quest to transform
the planet. He sees the books as reflecting the conditions of our own world.
"The first reason to go learn
more about Mars is because that will teach us more about Earth," Robinson
says. "And we need to know everything we can possibly know about Earth
to get through what I think of as a kind of crisis period, a couple centuries
of overcrowded environmental danger."
As they contemplate missions
to Mars in the 21st century, however, many scientists see terraforming
as the logical extension of humankind's need to exploit the resources of
the solar system in order to overcome, or escape, ecological crises on
Earth.
Would such action be just
another extension of our self-destructive nature, like throwing out an
empty pop bottle because we can buy another? Or would the settling of the
Martian frontier serve as another example of our boundless reservoir of
innovation?
It's too early to say, but
the question gives us yet more theories for science and more fodder for
fiction. In this light, Mars has never changed.
Dr. Kendrick is a professor
of English at Washington State University in Vancouver, Washington, who
specializes in electronic media and culture. Her DVD, Red Planet:
Scientific and Cultural Encounters with Mars, will be published by
the University of Pennsylvania Press in the spring of 2001.
What do you think?
Send your comments to the editor.