Ad Astra OnlineLiveScience.com HomepageStarryNight.comtelescope.com
  SEARCH:

advertisement


Additional Questions for Gregory Benford
By S. James Blackman

Special to SPACE.com

posted: 04:47 pm ET
22 March 2000

Gregory Benford has decades of experience as a space scientist, both as a professor of astrophysics and plasma physics at the University of California, Irvine and as a consultant to NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the Department of Energy and the White House Council on Space Policy. He is perhaps better known, though, for his award-winning and bestselling science fiction.


You've advised NASA and the White House; what propulsion systems do you think have the best chance of solving the Earth to Low Earth Orbit cost problem? What about longer range propulsion--anything hopeful there?


   More Stories

Benford and Zebrowski: The SPACE.com Interview


Additional Question for George Zebrowski


'Skylife' Could Be Definitive Look at Space Environments


Earth Versus the Black Hole: Greg Benford's 'Eater'

Gregory Benford (GB): I still like 2-stage to orbit using proven technology for liftoff -- airplanes! A big jet carrying a reusable rocket plane would find a niche market, I think, and tourism could make it viable. People won't go into space until the current failure rate of more than 2 percent falls by orders of magnitude! This is an argument I've had with Jerry Pournelle for 20 years.

For long range, I like sails for the missions outside the solar system. Flying a sail to within 0.2 astronomical units (AU) of the sun gives one a big kick, up to 10 AU/year, if the extreme lightweight materials can be made. I just wrote a report for JPL on near-horizon technology for doing this, so there's some hope, particularly with aluminum wire grids of nanometer diameter and carbon fiber sails, which I'm working on in the lab and theory right now. Still, it'll take a while . . . . .


In Eater, you write about a near-future science community that resembles, in your words, "a shouting match more than a scholarly discourse." Do you feel that this has already come to pass?

GB: I was cautioning against practices I already see making science more hot-blooded than it should be. I like competition, but jumping the gun just cheapens the race -- especially if it's not penalized! But remember, the scientists in Eater are dealing with an enormous threat, as well . . . .


Your last few novels, Cosm, The Martian Race, and Eater, have been set in the near future. Do you think you are likely to return to the galaxy-spanning space opera of The Stars in Shroud or the Galactic Center books?

GB: I don't think I'll return to the big epic scale right away. My ideas are all near future now, though I do have in mind a series of novels set in the very far future Earth . . . so no promises.


What do you think? Send your comments to the editor.


     about us | FREE Email Newsletter | message boards | register at SPACE.com | contact us | advertise with us | terms & conditions | privacy policy      DMCA/Copyright

     © Imaginova Corp. All rights reserved.