History paints a stormy future
The last solar cycle officially peaked in July 1989,
as measured by the number of monthly sunspots. But a second,
only slightly less active peak came four months
later. And the worst space storms from that cycle came after the main peak --
in November 1989, and even into July 1991.
|
Smooth
Sunspot Number
Averaging 13 months
of data generates a "smoothed" figure for each month. The past
six solar maximums are shown in grey. April 2000 is a possible peak, but
researchers won't know for many months. The
most recent figures available are for May.
SPACE.COM GRAPHIC
SOURCE: NOAA
All
about space weather
|
Will we stay on a plateau for two years, like the
last cycle, or has a slow decline already begun?
"No good answer," Murtagh said. "We certainly do
expect several active periods in the next two years."
While this solar maximum has not been an historical
whopper, it's no slouch. Two radiation
storms this year were the third and fourth most severe since 1975. And a
geomagnetic
storm on July 15 was the worst since 1991. Geomagnetic storms arrive later
than radiation storms, last longer and fuel the colorful lights known as auroras.
But major problems have not come, as they did in
1989 when a solar storm triggered a power surge that damaged a transformer at
Hydro-Quebec, leaving 6 million people in Canada and the northeastern United
States without power for more than nine hours. The current cycle has caused
no more than some relatively minor radio blackouts and a few small satellite
problems.
Satellites: Weathering the storms
Engineers design satellites to handle space weather.
They know that heavy doses of radiation can fry an expensive electronic camera
or disable navigational equipment.
|
The Barrage
Radiation
levels on the XMM's EPIC MOS cameras for each orbit during the past few
months. Main peaks correspond to the solar flare outbursts of July 14,
September 13 and November 8. Orbit number is shown at bottom of graph.
Click
to enlarge
SOURCE: ESA/XMM
Unexpected Protons
Proton
impacts imaged by an XMM camera. Click
to enlarge
SOURCE: Leicester
University Space Research Center
Uplink
your view
Are we out of the woods yet?
Post
your opinion |
But space can be a tricky place, and there's a
lot going on up there that is still a mystery. Just ask the scientists who operate
the XMM-Newton.
Twice on each orbit, both XMM and Chandra cross
Earth's radiation belts, which extend out from the planet some 25,000
miles (40,000 kilometers). In this danger zone, charged particles -- essentially
protons and electrons -- are trapped by Earth's magnetic field. Engineers planned
for this, and forecasters can predict the arrival of major space storms that
heighten the danger. Sensitive instruments on the spacecraft are shut down.
But more minor and mysterious waves of radiation,
not confined the radiation belts, have buffeted the craft without warning --
and so far have stumped researchers.
In one gust, a sheet or cloud of protons, estimated
to be 6 miles (10 kilometers) thick, pounded the telescope with 300 impacts
per square centimeter (0.16 square inch) every second for fifteen seconds. The
mysterious brief gusts are made of protons that pack less of a punch than larger,
more predictable bouts of space
weather.
"It is like trying to predict a gust of wind in
a specific place at a specific time," said Fabio Giannini of the European Space
Agency (ESA). "It appears that the Earth's magnetic field can concentrate these
low-energy particles."
Next page: Naked cameras