SEARCH:
   Hubble Space Telescope

advertisement


Space Mailbag: Leave Hollywood Out of NASA
By Anthony Duignan-Cabrera
Managing Editor
posted: 04:20 pm ET
13 August 2003

Readers by and large responded positively to our recent commentary "Call Hollywood

A special edition of the Space Mailbag

Readers by and large responded positively to our recent commentary "Call Hollywood! NASA Needs a Makeover", but a few SPACE.com readers felt NASA and its astronauts' deeds stand on their own two feet without having to resort to the antics of mere entertainers.

April writes: As far as astronauts behaving as rebels, as a NASA employee and a taxpayer, I would prefer that they not. If they do, I would rather that they find another job -- one that doesn't involve my money or my company's image.

Zoe agrees: Oh please, no! Not more rotten Hollywood crap. Ugh. NASA is one of the few refreshing holdouts to hype. Darn you.

John writes: Fascinating article. I think you may miss the larger picture. In order to be effective, NASA needs to let Boeing go out and develop its own spaceplane for commercial use. Take all of the money poured into the government agency to micromanage and regulate American space, and just let them go at it. Boeing could develop its own vehicles much more cheaply than it could under a NASA contract, and so could Lockheed-Martin. I honestly believe that NASA is no longer the answer to getting into space nor in getting people excited about space travel. It is the problem.

Others readers felt our managing editor was politically partisan in the selection of failed heroes:

George wrote to say: Exactly what deadly sin did William Bennett break? I don't remember gambling being one of them. I guess you don't let the truth get in the way of your politics.

ADC responds: Pride and greed were the first two that came to mind when I read about Mr. Bennett's gambling. Since he's got a bit of a weight problem, I'd throw in gluttony for good measure. (But hey, who doesn't have a few extra pounds around the middle, right?) No, Bill Bennett made the list because he wrote "The Book of Virtue". Its first chapter, Self-Discipline, contains the following: "There is much unhappiness and personal distress in the world because of the failures to control tempers, appetites, passions and impulses." Bill Bennett was not chosen because he was a conservative, but because he was a hypocrite.

Still, some readers agreed that NASA's image is stuck in the past and needs to grab the future with both hands:

Melynda writes: I just read your piece, and I'm shouting "Bravo!" This was a well thought-out piece, and it's something that's needed to be said for a long time. Here's hoping that someone at NASA -- someone who matters and can do something about it -- will read and consider your words. It's what NASA needs so desperately, because without public enthusiasm, funding will continue to be inadequate.

Tim writes: I enjoyed your commentary about more and better publicity for the astronaut corps. You might want to know that the September issue of Playboy shows a photo of (astronauts) Rick Linnehan and Leroy Chaio enjoying a party at Hugh Hefner's mansion. These are extraordinary people and I agree that they should be considered "stars."

ADC responds: Playboy? Now that's an issue I would read. ;-)


     about us | FREE Email Newsletter | message boards | register at SPACE.com | contact us | advertise | terms of service | privacy statement      DMCA/Copyright

     © Imaginova Corp. All rights reserved.