Make
Deimos a Space Port
While Philip Christensen
would be thrilled with almost any mission to Phobos or Deimos, another
long-time space innovator has specific plans for the little moons. Fred Singer,
president of the Science & Environmental Policy Project, has argued for the
past two years for a human mission to one of the Martian satellites.
|

Phobos is seen in the
Viking image. From a base on Deimos, astronauts could make a sortie to
Phobos. Note the big crater, called Stickney, at left.
IMAGES:
NASA/VIKING
|
"They are
neglected," Singer said in a telephone interview. "People have talked
only about Mars. To me, these moons are interesting in their own right. That's not
to say Mars is not interesting, but I think the moons deserve equal
consideration."
But who wants to be the
first astronaut to say, "I landed on Phobos!"?
Actually, Singer contends
that the best mission to Mars starts at Deimos, the outermost of the two
satellites. Take a travelling research vessel stuffed with a half dozen humans
and strap it to Deimos for six months, he suggests. Then use the moon -- an
odd-shaped object with an average diameter of 8 miles (13 kilometers) that
orbits 12,400 miles (20,000 kilometers) from Mars -- as a shield against cosmic
rays and solar storms.
Call it a space rock dock.
From the relatively safe
perch high above the Red Planet, the crew would send robotic probes to the
surface of Mars and control them in real-time (whereas the distance between
Earth and Mars creates a long communications delay). And instead of enduring
months of red dust on the harsh Martian surface, a small team could make a
quick weekend sortie to the surface to do those things only humans can do.
Like making that first
footprint in red dust.
But why dock at Deimos,
instead of going straight to Mars?
"It's cheaper. It can
be done faster, sooner," said Singer, who is also a researcher at George
Mason University and whose study of the orbit and origin of Phobos and Deimos
dates back to the 1960s. "It's safer, much safer," he continues.
"And you can get more information about Mars by exploring it from Deimos
than you can by landing on the surface."
For one thing, the scheme
would avoid the need to build a costly Mars base, required to shield the crew
from deadly radiation. And sidling a large spacecraft up to a low-gravity moon
is a lot less costly than setting down on Mars, a maneuver that requires a lot
more fuel, adding costly weight to a mission.
And Singer says that from
Deimos, scientists could deploy a series of robotic probes to the Martian
surface just as easily as they could from Mars. Each probe's destination and
mission would be determined by what was learned from previous probes.
Lesson from NEAR
The NEAR
spacecraft landing on Asteroid Eros in February illustrates the potential
of a mission to Phobos and Deimos, Singer says.
|
MYSTERIOUS LOSS
|
|
The most bizarre loss of a Mars probe is unarguably the
case of Phobos-2 (or Fobos-2, in the Russian spelling). It
"disappeared" in March 1989, under very unusual circumstances that
still mystify and excite many people. Learn
More
|
But NEAR was just a robot.
Isn't sending humans an incredible undertaking?
"Phobos and Deimos are
much easier to get to than Eros, and much easier to land on," Singer said,
"so it is a very viable proposition."
A landing would be aided by
the fact that the moons are locked into stable orbits and rotations. Eros, on
the other hand, was tumbling through space less predictably and made a tricky
target.
Meanwhile, the crew could
do some serious science on Deimos itself. Singer points out that Phobos and
Deimos are similar to Eros in size and appearance. "One wonders if they
have any connection," he said.
And now that there is some
data on Eros' composition, thanks
to NEAR, a comparison could be made. If the objects are similar, it
would be strong evidence that Phobos and Deimos are in fact asteroids that were
snagged into orbit by Mars' gravitational tug.
Nothing like being out
there
Christensen, a geologist by
training, says putting humans on Deimos makes sense, and scientists could
"learn a lot" about Mars by studying the Red Planet from above.
|
Uplink
|
|
Are Phobos
and Deimos captured asteroids? Should we send a spacecraft to find out?
Uplink your views.
|
Chipping away at Deimos
wouldn't be a bad thing, either.
"We may never really
know the story of these moons, and what they're made of and what their interior
is like, until we go and land on them," Christensen said. "There's
nothing like being out there with a hammer and a hand lens and doing real
geology, being able to pick up the rock and look at it."
Next page: Cool Phobos
Facts and Images