newsarama.com
advertisement


HOW THEY STACK UP: The difference between brown dwarfs and planets.


The Hubble Telescope snapped the first clear evidence of a brown dwarf in 1995.
Dark Planets May Orbit Strange Nearby Objects
Brown Dwarfs, Poorly Understood, Poorly Named
Brown Dwarf Emits Strong Radio Flare, Muddling Definitions
What Is a Planet? Debate Forces New Definition
Brown Dwarfs: Rejected Runts of Star Litters
By SPACE.com Staff

posted: 10:30 am ET
03 July 2001

BROWN DWARFS ARE STELLAR EMBRYOS

Brown dwarfs start out as the runts of the litter among newborn stars and suffer from that disadvantage forever, never developing into large, hydrogen-burning grown-ups, according to a new study.

Just like a pack of competing puppies, many baby stars start in clusters of two, three or even more stars grasping for gas to grow big. But some are ejected from these multiple-star systems before they grow massive enough to fuel their own fire and burn like stars, says astronomer Bo Reipurth of the University of Colorado at Boulder.

"The smaller and weaker star embryos are constantly flung out of the central feeding ground by gravitational slingshots, and thus grow slower," said Reipurth, a researcher at the University's Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy.

Whether singly or in small groups, all stars form out of dense cores that collapse, resulting in a powerful rain of gaseous material falling toward the stars' centers. The "luckier" objects become stars by moving around the center of such cores to accrete more matter and bulk up. The losers are ejected and become the dark, small, failed stars known as brown dwarfs.

Reipurth and Cathie Clarke of the Institute of Astronomy in Cambridge, England, co-authored a paper on the subject in the July 2001 issue of The Astronomical Journal.

A tough crowd

The littler guys just don't make it in the competitive core, the study shows.

"Amazingly, calculations show that the gravitational horseplay between stellar embryos almost always end up with the lightest member being violently flung out of the little group," Reipurth said.

Sometimes the kick merely sends it into an extended orbit around the other embryos, but more often it is completely booted out of the system.

"While we know the eventual outcome, it is impossible to precisely predict when such an ejection will occur," he said. "There is an element of randomness in this process, much like a lottery."

After 50,000 to 100,000 years, many of these multiple-star systems have decayed, leaving behind smaller binary or multiple-star systems.

Stars require roughly 8 percent of our Sun's mass to begin the process of nuclear ignition, said Reipurth.

"If they don't make it, they don't ignite," he said. "If such small star embryos are ejected by their siblings so early that they have not built up the necessary mass and fuel, they become brown dwarfs."

"With better luck in the disintegration lottery, a brown dwarf could have become a normal star, shining for billions of years. But without nuclear ignition, brown dwarfs are left to merely glimmer darkly forever," he said.

Lonely dwarfs

Binary stars are very common, but scientists have puzzled for years over why brown dwarfs are rarely found as close companions to normal stars, Reipurth said.

"Our model can now explain that, because a stellar embryo very close to one that succeeds in becoming a star would normally also get sufficiently fed to become a star," he said.

During the last year, astronomers have pinpointed several brown dwarfs that are distant companions to normal stars. "These are brown dwarfs that also were kicked out, but not quite strongly enough to avoid the pull of their siblings," he said.

Close examination with large telescopes of free-floating brown dwarfs has shown that some are binaries, Reipurth said.

"These are two small stellar embryos which formed a pair before they got ejected together. Widely spaced pairs of stellar embryos are more unlikely to survive an ejection intact, consistent with the observation that all known binary brown dwarfs are relatively close to each other."

The last few years have seen a flurry of discoveries of giant planets orbiting other stars, and it has been hotly debated whether such giant planets are simply very small brown dwarfs.

"This is not the case," said Reipurth.

"Even though brown dwarfs failed in the end to become stars, they still were formed the same way as stars. In contrast, giant planets are frequently found as very close companions to stars, implying they grew as planets from circumstellar disks like planets in our own solar system."

 

3-D Wooden Puzzle - Velociraptor Skeleton
$49.00
Explore More



















Site Map | News | SpaceFlight | Science | Technology | Entertainment | SpaceViews | NightSky | Ad Astra | SETI | Hot Topics
Image Galleries | Videos | Reader Favorites | Image of the Day | Amazing Images | Wallpapers | Games | Community
about us | FREE Email Newsletter | message boards | register at SPACE.com | contact us | advertise | terms of service | privacy statement
DMCA/Copyright
  What is This?