While keeping in mind that we astronomers
have much more to learn, my position on ETI is based on what we DO know
about our local astronomical environment. Many areas of astronomy have
enjoyed a huge increase in knowledge in the last 20 years. Here are a few
examples relevant to the question of ETI: better understanding of the Oort
cloud and Kuiper belt comet populations and dynamics, the metallicity gradient
in the Milky Way, the rates and distributions of supernovae in nearby galaxies,
the evolution of the long-lived radioactive element abundances in the interstellar
medium, etc.
I also consider Fermi's paradox to
be a very powerful argument against ETI. For a update on it, see my article
in the July/August 1998 issue of Society.
Guillermo Gonzalez, University of Washington
To the Editor:
When I first started reading this article,
I began to agree with it, but soon a thought came to me. Though I am only
15 years old and inexperienced, I do believe that if intelligent life on
this planet was created, then it is possible for there to be intelligent
civilizations on other planets as well. I mean, the universe is a pretty
big place and I honestly don't think that we are supposed to believe that
we are alone when there are an infinite amount of stars out there. We don't
even possess half the technology to look at enough of the sky to even begin
to postulate that Earth is the only planet that can support life capable
of producing technology. Just now we are starting to discover stars with
planets and those systems are nowhere near as far away as most of the stars
that are in the universe. I think we have to explore more of the sky before
we can start assuming that other life does not exist.
Kelly Halstrom
A recent opinion piece
by Peter Glaser advocated space solar power. A reader is skeptical. (Also,
see some earlier letters
on the subject.)
To the Editor:
Solar Space Power (SSP) is without
a doubt, a romantic technology. But SSP is also very impractical
too! In theory, we could erect huge solar panel farms in low Earth
orbit (LEO), or the surface of the moon. With these great space farms we
could convert the free energy from the sun and beam it down in the form
of microwaves.
In practice, the feasibility of such
a system is entirely unrealistic based on current launch costs. When one
calculates the cost of moving one kilogram (2.2 pounds) of mass into space,
and figures what the total mass of such a SSP station would weigh, this
technology becomes prohibitively expensive to move from the ground up.
For this solar power to be competitive in today’s market, many changes
need to be made. The most significant change will be the cost to transfer
a mass from Earth into space. The cost will need to drop an enormous order
of magnitude to become feasible. At the moment, there are no companies,
either private or governmental, that can deliver the type of payloads at
such a low cost. Although current technology will be able to build such
a power station in space, we will need solar power panels to become more
efficient than they currently are. This factor is directly proportional
to the size the station will need to be.
There are several other factors that
need to be accounted for, most notably, who will still make heavy-lift
launch vehicles to move such masses into space? The great days of the Apollo
era are long gone and all we have is a lousy space shuttle to show for
our last 30 years of human progression!
Before we can build great power stations
in the sky, we must first stop taking free rides off the backs of the space
heroes of the Kennedy administration, and rebuild our space program into
what it was over three decades ago!
Daniel M. Ikeda
And getting back to the subject
of alien intelligence, a reader in New Zealand provides this perspective:
To the Editor:
It is interesting that the debate about
extraterrestrial intelligent life and aliens now seems to have gone the
way of worn out Hollywood icons, or excommunicated members of the British
royal family. It is a pity you now need someone of importance to create
a newspaper headline that could attract attention to bring out the true
facts.
Other alien life-forms and extraterrestrial
intelligence do participate in the inhabitancy of this planet we call Earth
as they have done for many generations. Many years ago as a child I had
several encounters with these other life forms. These experiences taught
me much. Not only of a multitude of extraordinary insights into the future
of the human race, but also how many people in the present were prepared
to profit from my experiences. U.S. Military defense learnt much in technology
from them, some of which is still hidden in classified secrets. Others
would trivialize or joke, write books or make movies about my experiences
and publish personal photos without formally recognizing or compensating
for their use. I despair when I see so many prepared to play games of self-interest
while failing to see the real picture of what life is all about. Perhaps
I should ask, is it because they are afraid of the truth that we are not
an unique life form on this planet or in this universe?
We look further into space, and also
find similar things when we look inside ourselves. Another mystery that
we all need to cling to. As we solve one, we look for another. This is
scientific exploration. I enjoy it, just as much as part of my religion
and philosophy, which is just to sit back and enjoy the mystery without
always worrying about finding the solutions to the puzzles placed before
us.
What many of the world's population
(as it expands) have yet to learn that does not come from these outside
(alien) influences, is how we can live together and survive, as Earth's
resources slowly dwindle under humankind's mismanagement of the planet's
ecological resources.
Unless our space exploration can also
be directed at the complete understanding of our own planet, we and our
fellow beings will end up ultimately like the dinosaurs. Past inhabitants,
and littering the land as piles of bones and dust amongst all the other
rubbish we accumulate in our consecutive lifetimes.
Scientific knowledge is a major part
of our future -- let us make sure everything is done right, and in a proper
perspective if we are to have a future.
Frank R May, New Zealand
SPACE.com welcomes Letters
to the Editor. Letters intended for publication should be under 250 words,
and may be edited for style and clarity.