Manhattan Project... But not quite

The business and politics of space, NASA, and their intersection with the $ of Wall Street.

Manhattan Project... But not quite

Postby Ortix » Thu Oct 29, 2009 7:33 pm

I hope that everyone recalls how the United States was desperately trying to build an atomic bomb to crush the germans during WWII. We were cooperating with several nations to achieve our goal.

Now, I have been thinking. Isn't time for another big invention. I mean, we learned how to fly 100 years ago. We've been TRYING to do that for thousands of years. Now I think it's time to go faster than light.

We are just so darn primitive that I'm just ashamed of our race (no offense). We just spend millions and billions in killing each other over meaningless causes.

Can't we just "unite" (at least the smart and powerful countries... again no offense) and pour immense resources in building an FTL drive. This would be such a great benefit! The world would float in money if we can harvest all the raw materials from different planets. It would be "astronomical!"

That's basically my question, why don't we spend MOARH money on science. That's the path EVERY civilization will eventually choose, but sometimes they choose it too late. I don't want to see our race perish without even making it to a type 1. (Go Michio Kaku!)

Thoughts?
Ortix
atom
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:25 pm

Re: Manhattan Project... But not quite

Postby MeteorWayne » Thu Oct 29, 2009 7:49 pm

What is MOARH money?
"Gee Brain, what do you want to do tonight?"
"The same thing we do every night, Pinky... try to take over the world!"
User avatar
MeteorWayne
local group
 
Posts: 15951
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 1999 12:00 am

Re: Manhattan Project... But not quite

Postby Ortix » Thu Oct 29, 2009 7:59 pm

MOARH money = more money = 700 billion science stimulus plan
Ortix
atom
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:25 pm

Re: Manhattan Project... But not quite

Postby MeteorWayne » Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:52 pm

Oh, and BTW, if you are suggesting the goal is FTL travel, you can look for this thread in The Unexplained shortly.

That's not a subject for this forum.
"Gee Brain, what do you want to do tonight?"
"The same thing we do every night, Pinky... try to take over the world!"
User avatar
MeteorWayne
local group
 
Posts: 15951
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 1999 12:00 am

Re: Manhattan Project... But not quite

Postby tanstaafl76 » Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:42 pm

The problem with your idea is we had the science and engineering capability to test the hypotheses involved in the Manhattan project, we do not have the science and engineering capability to test the hypotheses involved with FTL travel, not even close, and it wouldn't matter if we spent $700 billion on it or not.
User avatar
tanstaafl76
asteroid
 
Posts: 482
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 1999 12:00 am

Re: Manhattan Project... But not quite

Postby doom_shepherd » Tue Nov 03, 2009 5:26 pm

We'd be better off engaging in a "Manhattan Project" to create a practical fusion power generator. Or just to harness the power of the sunlight that reaches Earth orbit.

Or, how about capturing "lightning in a bottle?" (That is, developing a way to capture and store the energy released in a single lightning strike?)

You probably need to be able to harness those levels of energies to even begin to think about FTL.
"It's hard being an evil genius when everybody else is so stupid..." -- Quantum Crook, "Casey & Andy."
User avatar
doom_shepherd
comet
 
Posts: 134
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:06 pm

Re: Manhattan Project... But not quite

Postby SpaceXFanMobius57 » Tue Nov 03, 2009 6:45 pm

Its foolish to be ashamed of our race, we are a developing civilization and developing civilizations do what they do. We will develop naturally and will go intersteller eventually. (Plus we are not even close to the tech level for a FTL system)
User avatar
SpaceXFanMobius57
rock
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 9:37 pm

Return to Space Business and Technology