harper05's Page

More from harper05

Forum Posts

Comments

Posted on: Miniature Black Holes
at 11/06/2009 5:47pm

Ill offer some "speculation", based on the work of Dr.Lisa Randall's (Harvard physics prof.)theory of ... more(+)

Ill offer some "speculation", based on the work of Dr.Lisa Randall's (Harvard physics prof.)theory of gravitation. In it she surmises that gravity is leaking in to our universe via the gravity dimension. And if you could get 2 protons super close maybe 10-20th m(guessing, can't remember the distance) maybe closer, they will get a boost from the g dim. (Because g becomes way more intense at these close proximity's). Alowing them to orbit and try to merge, shrinking down to a mini black hole and evaporating almost instantaneously. The lhc does have the energy requirements for this. And if she and Dr. Hawking are correct, the probability this will occur at lhc is likely. In wich case they would both be in the running for a nobel prize.

Basically the protons would get so close they would be a proton distance apart and rotate each other at c. then evaporate.

Its like this,

Gravitational attraction between two contiguous Schwarzschild protons can easily accommodate both nucleon and quark confinement. In this picture, we can treat “strong” gravity as the strong force. We calculate that two contiguous
Schwarzschild protons would rotate at c and have a period of 10-23s and a frequency of 10 to the 22Hz which is characteristic of the strong force interaction time and a close approximation of the gamma emission typically associated with nuclear decay. Using a semi-classical model, we find that a proton charge orbiting at a proton radius at c generates a good approximation to the measured anomalous magnetic moment.

Quantum vacuum density, Vp= 9.66*10 to the -39cm3
quantity of the density of the vacuum available in the volume of a proton is Rp=PvRp
then Rp=4.98*10^ 55th gm/proton volume

One can obtaian a similar result by utilizing the proton volume Vp, and dividing the planck volume given by Vpl=l^3
Therefore Vpl=4.22*10^-99 cm^3 whare l is the planck length given by l=1.62*10^-33cm.
Then N=Vp/Vpl yields the quantity 2.29*10^60, where N is the ratio of the proton volume to the planck volume.
Since the planck mass Mp is given as Mp=2.18 *10^-5gm, the the mass density within a proton is Rp=MpN
Then Rp=4.98*10^55gm/Pv.

Interesting note:
This is typically the value given to the mass of matter in the universe. We calculate then what portion of the total vacuum density available in a proton volume is necessary for the nucleon to obey the schwarzchild condition. May be evidence of all protons entangled on a universal level.

Rs=2gm/c^2. The mass needed to obey the sch. cond. for a radius of Rp=1.32fm is
m=c^2Rs/2g where we choose the condition that Rs=Rp=1.32fm, and the g constant is given as
g=6.67*10^-8cm^3/Gms^2
The value of speed of light is c=2.99*10^10cm/s
then m=the s mass of m=8.85*10^14gm which is derived from the density of the vacuum available in a proton volume Vp.

note that only a very small proportion of the available mass-energy density from the vacuum within Vp
is required for a nucleon to obey the Schwarzschild condition. In fact, the ratio of the quantity of density of the vacuum in the volume of a proton, Rp=4.88*10^55 to the quantity sufficient for the proton to meet the Schwarzschild condition,
M=8.85*10^14gm is
M/Rp=1.78*10^-41

Therefore, only 1.78*10^-39% ?of the mass-energy density of the vacuum is required to form a
“Schwarzschild proton.This contribution from the vacuum may be the result of a small amount of the vacuum energy becoming coherent and polarized near and at the boundary of the horizon of the proton due to spacetime torque and Coreolis effects as described by the Haramein-Rauscher solution.

Now let us consider the gravitational force between two contiguous Schwarzschild protons. In a semi-classical approach the force between these protons is given as
f=gm^2/(2Rp)^2
where the distance between the protons’ centers is 2Rp=2.64fm, yielding force of 7.49*10^47 dynes

We now calculate the velocity of two Schwarzschild protons orbiting each other with their centers separated by a proton diameter. We utilize the force to calculate the associated acceleration a=f/m
yields A=8.46*10^32cm/s^2
We utilized this acceleration to derive the relativistic velocity as
2*square root of 2ARp
the period of rotation of such a system is given by t=2(pi)Rp/v wich yields t=5.55*10^-23
Interestingly, this is the characteristic interaction time of the strong force.

This is from my notes on schwarzchild protons and
Ive tried to shorten the math hopefully not leaving anything out, there is more if anyone is interested.  close(-)

Posted on: Earthlike Double Planet Possible?
at 11/06/2009 2:48pm

Keep in mind there would be an area of immense opposing gravitational forces in between the close part of the 2 super ... more(+)

Keep in mind there would be an area of immense opposing gravitational forces in between the close part of the 2 super close planets. Creating kind of a neutral g zone if you will. This may allow the atmosphere to stretch further than a few hundred kilometers. So if they were say 1500-2000 km apart, it might be more feasible, they would have to orbit each other really fast though. And this motion of the g zone probably would tear apart the planets, talk about tidal forces... wow

Either way this would definitely make them unearth-like

I bet I would have like a 20ft vertical leap in this more nuetral g zone, anyone wanna play 1on1!!  close(-)

Posted on: LHC Status
at 11/06/2009 2:32pm

I agree ittiz, good point, however the money is lacking in astronomy and physics, at least for my taste.
My sister is ... more(+)

I agree ittiz, good point, however the money is lacking in astronomy and physics, at least for my taste.
My sister is working on her phd at usf in biophysics. She and her team have isolated the proteins capable of growing artificial retinas from scratch!! Very cool stuff close(-)

Posted on: Gravity speed
at 11/06/2009 2:10pm

To hell with finding a needle in a haystack... find a subatomic entangled particle in a universe....

Apology in ... more(+)

To hell with finding a needle in a haystack... find a subatomic entangled particle in a universe....

Apology in advance; I'm sorry... Please don't ridicule me.. I do that enough to myself..
I think in the future we might find some particles are all universally entangled to each other, maybe even protons.. (I know this is completely out there, just one of my wilder thoughts)..

It was a paper by Nassim Haramein, on the schwarzchild proton, that actually won an award and paper of the year in 09, that yielded this thought. I would love to hear my fellow s.d.c.ers thoughts on it. I cant find the link, but google it, close(-)

Posted on: Gravity speed
at 11/06/2009 1:47pm

Note; undidley, you misquoted me, I never said the, you don't know physics bit, that was Ramparts.

But by all means, ... more(+)

Note; undidley, you misquoted me, I never said the, you don't know physics bit, that was Ramparts.

But by all means, believe in gluons...

The first direct experimental evidence of gluons was found in 1979(30 years ago). when three-jet events were observed at the EPC at PETRA. However, just before PETRA appeared on the scene, the PLUTO experiment at DORIS showed event topologies suggestive of a three-gluon decay.

Experimentally, confinement is verified by the failure of free quark searches. Hence free gluons have not been directly observed or confined. This may be old information though as I am writing from memory, Ill check it out for sure.

Also, quark-gluon plasma has been found recently at the RHIC at BNL. (Relativistic heavy ion collider)

You could choose not to believe in glueballs if you like, but not for long...

http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/pro ... id=6804222 close(-)

This user has not commented on any articles or features...