Robotic Planes Complete Fly-by Testing By Andrew Bridges Associated Press posted: 09:20 pm ET 07 April 2003
Untitled
MOJAVE, California (AP) -- Pilots spent four days
last week flying a trio of airplanes at each other over the Mojave Desert,
missing on each pass by as little as 300 meters (1,000 feet.)
Remarkable was where one of the pilots was not. Some
3,450 meters (11,500 feet) below the cockpit, one pilot sat safely on the ground
as he coolly scrambled to avoid hitting his colleagues with the skeletal
experimental aircraft he flew by remote control.
The flights are part of a NASA project to develop a
collision-avoidance system that would allow fully autonomous, and not just
remotely piloted, aircraft to operate in civil airspace.
The robotic drones, commonly called unmanned aerial
vehicles, have garnered lots of publicity thanks to their high-profile, military
roles in Kosovo, Afghanistan, Yemen and, now, Iraq. Yet beyond the hype, the
planes still aren't approved for routine use over the United States.
Images
The Proteus unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in flight. The collision-avoidance radar can be seen under the aircraft's nose. Click to enlarge.
A diagram of how the collision-avoidance radar system on Proteus, flying as an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), will work. Click to enlarge.
Doug Shane of Scaled Composites LLC looks over the screen of his Proteus ground control station during a flight test in New Mexico. Click to enlarge.
The control screen used by ground controllers to fly Proteus. Air speed, horizon and altitude are displayed on the screen's upper left, while the collision-avoidance radar is displayed as a green field (center bottom). Click to enlarge.
The Federal Aviation Administration remains concerned
the drones could pose a collision hazard to other, piloted aircraft. For now,
the FAA must certify each drone flight, or series of flights, individually.
The FAA, Pentagon and NASA are studying the safety
and reliability standards that drones must meet, FAA spokesman William Shumann
said.
The FAA wants to make sure that drones can respond as
quickly as piloted aircraft to instructions from air traffic controllers,
Shumann said. It's also uncertain whether remote operators of drones would need
to be licensed pilots, he added.
During 20 collision scenarios flown in restricted
airspace over four days and completed last Friday, the ground-based pilots of
the experimental Proteus saw nothing of the other two planes, save the stream of
radar and other data that alerted them to their presence.
Each time the Proteus maneuvered in time to avoid
colliding with the other aircraft -- an F/A-18 jet and a propeller-driven
Beechcraft.
"We were seeing the targets earlier than the pilots
in some cases," said Peter Siebold, a test pilot for Proteus builder Scaled
Composites LLC. (A pilot and co-pilot were aboard the Proteus, but only as
backups.)
Engineers equipped the Proteus with a radar system
originally developed to help low-flying helicopter pilots avoid power lines. The
plane also carried an instrument able to detect the transponders found in larger
aircraft, though not gliders, hot air balloons and antique planes.
Eventually, engineers envision a system that combines
radar, transponders, cameras and other instruments so drones can operate as
safely as any other plane. Such a system is anywhere from 10 years to 15 years
away.
"The demonstrations we're doing are not the
definitive answer. They're a step on the way," said Glenn Hamilton, of the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Dryden Flight Research Center.
Teal Group Corp. aviation analyst Richard Aboulafia
said the FAA will come to accept drones with time. Continued military use helps,
despite the many crashes that have brought down drones, including Predators and
Global Hawks.
"It's a question of flight time," Aboulafia said.
"What you will see is the FAA get a warm and fuzzy from the number of flight
hours that have been trouble free."
NASA is fostering the development of drones for
mapping, communications and reconnaissance of fires and other natural
disasters.