Competitive posturing?
But Krimigis is no less enthusiastic about the capabilities of his technology
house. And while he agrees that JPL's sheer size makes it best-suited for certain
large, complex missions, he's clear that he's not planning to play second fiddle
on any mission he deems suitable.
A case in point is the Pluto mission, which has yet to receive a go-ahead but
has been winnowed down to two bidders. Guess which two?
"I think that both organizations have strengths and, obviously, weaknesses,
but on any one project both organizations could bring a lot of expertise to
bear," Krimigis said. "We also aspire to missions that are very, very difficult
to do."
McCurdy, the NASA historian, thinks there might be some corporate-like posturing
at play. JPL is the clear leader in Mars missions, with a long-term plan to
pave the way for human exploration. And JPL has a host of successes and failures
in trying to reach the Red Planet, which all add up to a bank of experience
that will make it difficult for APL or anyone to get in on the Mars game.
But some in the space industry expect that the first humans to go beyond the
Moon will not go to Mars, but rather to an asteroid. Such a mission would serve
as a deep-space training ground for eventual travel to the Red Planet.